Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 171. (Read 2347601 times)
I don't know why but both gtx 1080ti and gtx 1060*3 with 70-75% TDP make less on sp-mod 3 than mod-2
it was profitable from start, but at the moment with 7$ price and huge net hashrate it's waste of power.
Hey SP u were asking about what speeds we were getting in the community. I am getting around 3850 mh/s with gtx 1070 on Palgin miner.
Regards,
Dan
Regards,
Dan
If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
I'm sorry, but you're really pathetic. Palgin has already released a faster version, and your overclocking will be able to give a maximum of $ 0.05 so the meaning pays you for the mod, when there is based on free software? Or you have lifted your nose to feel like a super developer, so I'll take care of you - there are much better developers who do not bug btc for their work, but accept free donat. Now if you wrote from scratch your own miner on any other code, then there would not be any questions, and so you just use someone else's labor to profit. Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Bitsend(XEVAN) can be sold, and profit is declining from day to day.
In the thread klrx started he said that the miner does 3.3MHASH on the 1070. I just ask you for some numbers, and I have got some answers. I am making a miner that does more than 4MHASH on the gtx 1070. This is the number you need to mine with a profit right now..
current profit 24hours of mining:
3.3Mhash =(0.08774*0.0033)=0,00026322btc= $1.2
4Mhash =(0.08774*0.004)=0,00035096btc= $1.6175
Here is the nicehashminer profit calculator 24 hours: $1.62
In the thread klrx started he said that the miner does 3.3MHASH on the 1070. I just ask you for some numbers, and I have got some answers. I am making a miner that does more than 4MHASH on the gtx 1070. This is the number you need to mine with a profit right now..
current profit 24hours of mining:
3.3Mhash =(0.08774*0.0033)=0,00026322btc= $1.2
4Mhash =(0.08774*0.004)=0,00035096btc= $1.6175
Here is the nicehashminer profit calculator 24 hours: $1.62
but what about the 1070. 1060 6g and 1060 6gb?
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
Here are my result for an open source
[2017-10-08 23:05:06] GPU#2:MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 2572.14kH/s
[2017-10-08 23:05:06] [S/A/T]: 0/32/32, diff: 0.010, 15.59MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:29] [S/A/T]: 0/41/41, diff: 0.016, 15.90MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:29] GPU#1:MSI GTX 1070, 3524.05kH/s
[2017-10-08 23:05:29] [S/A/T]: 0/42/42, diff: 0.010, 15.93MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:36] [S/A/T]: 0/46/46, diff: 0.023, 16.06MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:42] GPU#5:MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 2510.43kH/s
You are pathetic, constantly lying about how bad is open source miner is.
If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
How do you compute profit? Coin can not be sold yet
The Xevan miner was just released. Another alexei rippoff with some added new padding bytes.
if this was so easy, why you wasn't able add some padding? Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64 3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64 3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs
On what clocks and config?
Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64 3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64 3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs
On what clocks and config?
I use cuda 7.5.
If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
yeah, but all you're doing is relying on cuda9 to make your 'existing' *cough* code quicker.
no skill there.
If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64 3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs
So you can go and work further. You gain nothing.
If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.
public miner does 4mhs @ 109W (60%tdp) gtx1080
So you are saying that the higher model, more expenisve card is only 3.8% faster than on the gtx 1070 with the sp-mod?
public miner does 4mhs @ 109W (60%tdp) gtx1080
So you are saying that the higher model, more expensive card is only 3.8% faster than the gtx 1070 running the sp-mod?
but what about the 1070. 1060 6g and 1060 6gb?
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
public miner does 4mhs @ 109W (60%tdp) gtx1080Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
Throw you overpriced overclocked gtx1070 to the toilet ))
but what about the 1070. 1060 6g and 1060 6gb?
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)
1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)
I have made a xevan miner now. How fast is the opensource and on wich launchconfig?
6.3 mh 1080 ti oc'ed with cuda 9.0 x32
It looks as if mod#3 does not read the intensity value from the config file.
When I use the exact same config file on mod#2 then it does work.
Can you fix this?
When I use the exact same config file on mod#2 then it does work.
Can you fix this?
The Xevan miner was just released. Another alexei rippoff with some added new padding bytes. The miner was profitable for 6 hours. and when the windows binary was released, there was no profit left. So the opensorce miner is now worth nothing.
Krlx got his bounty of 0.5btc, and with your logic, he should share the bounty with the real developers of the ccminer right? 99% of the code is written by me and the other devs, he just changed a few lines of code to claim the bounty. 2-3 days of work. 0.5btc. Nice inside job..
Krlx got his bounty of 0.5btc, and with your logic, he should share the bounty with the real developers of the ccminer right? 99% of the code is written by me and the other devs, he just changed a few lines of code to claim the bounty. 2-3 days of work. 0.5btc. Nice inside job..
You clearly didn't look at the code for more than a couple seconds. Or maybe not at all.
Jump to: