1) Everything is seen on picture: miner, hashrate. So I don't know whether you have right alexis78 miner or not.
2) Use "-d 0,2"
where did you get the binary? the Git has only source code. 2) Use "-d 0,2"
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 196. (Read 2347601 times)
wrong on all accounts, other than he source code (which sp isn't providing n violation of the gp)
https://leland.me/gpl-myths/
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#CanIDemandACopy
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLAllowRequireFee
and many more.. I suggest you read through it
https://leland.me/gpl-myths/
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#CanIDemandACopy
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLAllowRequireFee
and many more.. I suggest you read through it
And where does it say you get to redistribute someone elses code? I have read through it, I'm the one who quoted such sources a year ago when this popped up.
You're paraphrasing, IF XYZ commits a crime, I too get to commit that crime and it's no longer a crime. That's not the way it works. He's required to give out the source code, that DOES NOT allow you to resell his code or give it out for free.
You literally quoted articles supporting that you have to give out the source, not that you can resell it or give away HIS source for free. Once again I never said he doesn't need to give out his source (I've literally said opposite of that multiple times), what we're discussing is the legality of someone giving out his code and reselling HIS work. GPL code is just GPL code, it doesn't include his changes as far as being able to redistribute it.
Pretty big difference here. I suggest you actually read the post you're responding to before copy/pasting answers.
Since you can't be bothered to read the links...
Quote
The GPL is a free software license, and therefore it permits people to use and even redistribute the software without being required to pay anyone a fee for doing so.
You can charge people a fee to get a copy from you. You can't require people to pay you when they get a copy from someone else.
You can charge people a fee to get a copy from you. You can't require people to pay you when they get a copy from someone else.
Also:
Quote
If I distribute GPL'd software for a fee, am I required to also make it available to the public without a charge? (#DoesTheGPLRequireAvailabilityToPublic)
No. However, if someone pays your fee and gets a copy, the GPL gives them the freedom to release it to the public, with or without a fee. For example, someone could pay your fee, and then put her copy on a web site for the general public.
No. However, if someone pays your fee and gets a copy, the GPL gives them the freedom to release it to the public, with or without a fee. For example, someone could pay your fee, and then put her copy on a web site for the general public.
Also:
Quote
Does the GPL allow me to distribute copies under a nondisclosure agreement? (#DoesTheGPLAllowNDA)
No. The GPL says that anyone who receives a copy from you has the right to redistribute copies, modified or not. You are not allowed to distribute the work on any more restrictive basis.
No. The GPL says that anyone who receives a copy from you has the right to redistribute copies, modified or not. You are not allowed to distribute the work on any more restrictive basis.
And:
Quote
Does the GPL allow me to distribute a modified or beta version under a nondisclosure agreement? (#DoesTheGPLAllowModNDA)
No. The GPL says that your modified versions must carry all the freedoms stated in the GPL. Thus, anyone who receives a copy of your version from you has the right to redistribute copies (modified or not) of that version. You may not distribute any version of the work on a more restrictive basis.
No. The GPL says that your modified versions must carry all the freedoms stated in the GPL. Thus, anyone who receives a copy of your version from you has the right to redistribute copies (modified or not) of that version. You may not distribute any version of the work on a more restrictive basis.
Seriously. If you still persist saying you have read this, you clearly have not. It's plain as fucking day, spelled out in very simple English. And it says it over, and over, and over. You'd have to be blind as a bat to miss this if you had actually read it. I didn't even include all the references, there are a bunch more.
Hey sp any chance you can make a nv gpu miner for xevan algo?I think they even have a bounty for it
Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
Thank you
So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?
Thanks.
Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.
These are new coins here are the announcement threads. New coins are a bit risky, but with abit of luck you can make $30 per card per day.
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
virta-unique-coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/virta-unique-coin-launch-1966621
coimatic-2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-1961830
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
virta-unique-coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/virta-unique-coin-launch-1966621
coimatic-2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-1961830
Yes they were risky...atleast coimatic 2.0. See thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1835672.840 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.380
Atleast some serious scam clouds above those coins...
and virta unique coin is trash not profitable just look at the emission and volume...
These are new coins here are the announcement threads. New coins are a bit risky, but with abit of luck you can make $30 per card per day.
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
virta-unique-coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/virta-unique-coin-launch-1966621
coimatic-2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-1961830
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
virta-unique-coin:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/virta-unique-coin-launch-1966621
coimatic-2:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/closed-1961830
Yes they were risky...atleast coimatic 2.0. See thread -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1835672.840 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.380
Atleast some serious scam clouds above those coins...
This is exactly what I'm seeing on my overnight tests. The hashrate displayed by ccminer in this new skein mod doesn't translate to the hashrate on the pool. Curious now if there is an optimisation or just assumed there is one due to a higher reported number by ccminer when using multiple gpu threads. I can deal with the mismatch of numbers as long as there is ultimately an optimisation.
Clarification would be good!
Clarification would be good!
THE MULTI-THREAD PER GPU HASH RATE IS LIKELY WRONG MINER-SIDE--
This multi-thread per GPU strategy was experimented with in the X11/Quark GPU mining era. It was an attempt at emulating the feature which works in SGminer. The experiment caused a lot of excitement, I was an enthusiastic beta-tester, but results pool-side were not so exciting. Miners get paid by pool-side results.
--scryptr
Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
https://image.ibb.co/e0j2wv/123.png
Thank you
So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?
Thanks.
Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.
Is bigger hashrate applied solo mining?
This is exactly what I'm seeing on my overnight tests. The hashrate displayed by ccminer in this new skein mod doesn't translate to the hashrate on the pool. Curious now if there is an optimisation or just assumed there is one due to a higher reported number by ccminer when using multiple gpu threads. I can deal with the mismatch of numbers as long as there is ultimately an optimisation.
Clarification would be good!
Clarification would be good!
Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
Thank you
So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?
Thanks.
Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.
hey alexis can you give me a Tip? I did not manage to go with alexis78.exe on Neoscrypt with a 1060 3gb Samsung mem to even 800 Hashes (or 900 like Abdu posted)
Ive downloaded 1-2 versions of your miners including the one in Nemos miner still same hashes
my best was with Crazy OC settings 756
And i 16 does not work, only i 15 and below
Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
Thank you
So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?
Thanks.
Beware of pool side hashrate if you try it... It has failed on my end.
Mr. Tanguy also reported a failure on utilizing multiple host threads per single device on a chat we had, long time ago.
The failure we encountered is the same as above. Bigger hashrate miner side. Lower hashrate on pool.
I'll try alexis miner on my 1080ti
Night tests results:
As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Aha-ha all sp "optimisations" of skein are just options setting.As sp said, i used default intensity (28) and --gputhreads 2:
spmod skein: miner hashrate 5900-6200, pool hashrate - 4300-5300
Also i tried to launch Alexis miner with 2 threads per gpu -d 0,0,1,1 etc... and 3% less hashrate and without fees
sp, i know what your kernels speed always close to pool speed, but skein - need to fix it.
Now I get 440 from 1060 (2200 from 5*1060) with Alexis78
https://image.ibb.co/e0j2wv/123.png
Thank you
So, the real switch in Alexis miner to get these results is "-t 10" (for 5 cards) or "-d 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4"?
Thanks.
Major bug in skein #1 is found. I will send out an update later today.
26.6% devfee was lowered, I hope?
Major bug in skein #1 is found. I will send out an update later today.
wrong on all accounts, other than he source code (which sp isn't providing n violation of the gp)
https://leland.me/gpl-myths/
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#CanIDemandACopy
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLAllowRequireFee
and many more.. I suggest you read through it
https://leland.me/gpl-myths/
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#CanIDemandACopy
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#DoesTheGPLAllowRequireFee
and many more.. I suggest you read through it
And where does it say you get to redistribute someone elses code? I have read through it, I'm the one who quoted such sources a year ago when this popped up.
You're paraphrasing, IF XYZ commits a crime, I too get to commit that crime and it's no longer a crime. That's not the way it works. He's required to give out the source code, that DOES NOT allow you to resell his code or give it out for free.
You literally quoted articles supporting that you have to give out the source, not that you can resell it or give away HIS source for free. Once again I never said he doesn't need to give out his source (I've literally said opposite of that multiple times), what we're discussing is the legality of someone giving out his code and reselling HIS work. GPL code is just GPL code, it doesn't include his changes as far as being able to redistribute it.
Pretty big difference here. I suggest you actually read the post you're responding to before copy/pasting answers.
What is the Best Neoscrypt Miner??
Best ive got was 756 with Crazy OC alexisminer
1060 3gb Samsung
116 Pl
+235 Core clock
+910 Mem Clock
756 Hashes
Some guys claiming they got 880-900 with Alexis miner 1.0 I dont believe them
Believe it or notBest ive got was 756 with Crazy OC alexisminer
1060 3gb Samsung
116 Pl
+235 Core clock
+910 Mem Clock
756 Hashes
Some guys claiming they got 880-900 with Alexis miner 1.0 I dont believe them
Have I the Wrong alexis miner? the only difference i see is the intensity that is 16 and i used 15
btw how do I set different Instances on Neoscrypt
--cuda-devices 0 2
does not work
2) Use "-d 0,2"
thnx for the -d parameter
my alexis78.exe is from the Nemos multiminer is is the same?
And the miner does not let me Run -i 16 only 15
With i16 or if i set it on Auto it picks i I 16 it says something about cuda error cpu int at line 948 out of memory
Does it matter if its 1060 3gb or 6bg *I know 6gb has somewhat more cores but 150 Hashes difference?
and Last what settings are you using?
What is the Best Neoscrypt Miner??
Best ive got was 756 with Crazy OC alexisminer
1060 3gb Samsung
116 Pl
+235 Core clock
+910 Mem Clock
756 Hashes
Some guys claiming they got 880-900 with Alexis miner 1.0 I dont believe them
Believe it or notBest ive got was 756 with Crazy OC alexisminer
1060 3gb Samsung
116 Pl
+235 Core clock
+910 Mem Clock
756 Hashes
Some guys claiming they got 880-900 with Alexis miner 1.0 I dont believe them
Have I the Wrong alexis miner? the only difference i see is the intensity that is 16 and i used 15
btw how do I set different Instances on Neoscrypt
--cuda-devices 0 2
does not work
2) Use "-d 0,2"
But who cares now about it? Now sp8 is slower than others - point.
So everytime the other coders release faster miners, you want me release a new faster version for free right? Then stop to copy and spread my shit and donate to support my work. Signatum #8 is faster on all the cards I have.
In real life Alexis78 = 445 on 1060. In real life spmod8 is slower.
P.S. No miner in my pm. Still afraid of real comparison in skein?
how much is the skunk 8 faster than the 6?
Depends on the card, but I think around +4% or more,
how much fast is your Sp neoscrypt miner?
Jump to: