Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 316. (Read 2347601 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
According to the nicehash calculator a gtx 1070 is now down to $2.3 per day in profit.
 In january 1 gtx 1070 only earned $1.2 at nicehash. So this might the begining of a new crypto iceage  Smiley

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc

Winter is coming (;
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
According to the nicehash calculator a gtx 1070 is now down to $2.3 per day in profit.
 In january 1 gtx 1070 only earned $1.2 at nicehash. So this might the begining of a new crypto iceage  Smiley

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Working on nexus #7 now.


Then cryptonite #4 and bitcore #2
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
sp_ any chance you fix 8. 0.05BTC Cryptonite sp-mod (+20%) (3 releases) (18-19MHASH on gtx 1070) (30Mhash 1080ti)

it`s does not work on 1080ti at all, crash at startup, I tried all I could.... pls respond to pm
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Please stop using percentuals of the pl... each gpu can have a different default pl and xx% of it doesn't mean anything without the info of the default tdp wattage.
You can see the actual limit in watts with the nvidiasmi command.
Spikes won't go too far above pl and you have a decent psu. I would probably set the limit to 250W.
Limit is 120 (so its 300w) , as you can see its jumping above of limit.
https://i.imgur.com/6NCrhXr.jpg
Yeah that makes me nervous with my risers. Also difficulty is around 210 right now. So I don't think I'm going to be dabbling in the spreadminer. Perhaps something else like Nexus.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Please stop using percentuals of the pl... each gpu can have a different default pl and xx% of it doesn't mean anything without the info of the default tdp wattage.
You can see the actual limit in watts with the nvidiasmi command.
Spikes won't go too far above pl and you have a decent psu. I would probably set the limit to 250W.
Limit is 120 (so its 300w) , as you can see its jumping above of limit.
https://i.imgur.com/6NCrhXr.jpg
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.


Check the power draw with:
C:\"Program Files"\"NVIDIA Corporation"\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe -l

and set the desired tdp with msi afterburner.
You didn't see any spikes? I would like it to never go above 85% pl.

Edit: I use precision x right now and set all my cards to 60% power target.

Please stop using percentuals of the pl... each gpu can have a different default pl and xx% of it doesn't mean anything without the info of the default tdp wattage.
You can see the actual limit in watts with the nvidiasmi command.
Spikes won't go too far above pl and you have a decent psu. I would probably set the limit to 250W.

Oh yeah forgot about that.

All my cards 60% = 150w 80% = 200w.
sr. member
Activity: 544
Merit: 250
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.


Check the power draw with:
C:\"Program Files"\"NVIDIA Corporation"\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe -l

and set the desired tdp with msi afterburner.
You didn't see any spikes? I would like it to never go above 85% pl.

Edit: I use precision x right now and set all my cards to 60% power target.

Please stop using percentuals of the pl... each gpu can have a different default pl and xx% of it doesn't mean anything without the info of the default tdp wattage.
You can see the actual limit in watts with the nvidiasmi command.
Spikes won't go too far above pl and you have a decent psu. I would probably set the limit to 250W.


Don't forget different BIOS have different % factor also.

For example, on the AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, bios firmware F3 has Default/max:300W/375W, but on F4, it has Default/max:250W/375W. So even if both are the same cards, 75% will not 75% if they are on different bios.

Source: http://www.gigabyte.us/Graphics-Card/GV-N108TAORUS-11GD#support-dl
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Spreadminer #11 is complete and in testing.
- Fixed exit up on crash. (No more craszy hashrates)
Doesn't work.
https://i.imgur.com/YW1h6Vn_d.jpg

Right. Forgot to merge this fix in. Sad

I have to send out another version.
newbie
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
Spreadminer #11 is complete and in testing.

- Fixed exit up on crash. (No more craszy hashrates)

Doesn't work.
https://i.imgur.com/YW1h6Vn_d.jpg
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.


Check the power draw with:
C:\"Program Files"\"NVIDIA Corporation"\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe -l

and set the desired tdp with msi afterburner.
You didn't see any spikes? I would like it to never go above 85% pl.

Edit: I use precision x right now and set all my cards to 60% power target.

Please stop using percentuals of the pl... each gpu can have a different default pl and xx% of it doesn't mean anything without the info of the default tdp wattage.
You can see the actual limit in watts with the nvidiasmi command.
Spikes won't go too far above pl and you have a decent psu. I would probably set the limit to 250W.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.


Check the power draw with:
C:\"Program Files"\"NVIDIA Corporation"\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe -l

and set the desired tdp with msi afterburner.
You didn't see any spikes? I would like it to never go above 85% pl.

Edit: I use precision x right now and set all my cards to 60% power target.
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.


Check the power draw with:
C:\"Program Files"\"NVIDIA Corporation"\NVSMI\nvidia-smi.exe -l

and set the desired tdp with msi afterburner.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Can we use mod 10 if we are worried about too much power draw?

4x 1080 Ti on an EVGA 1300 G2.
member
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
I also found it suspicious that I haven't found any blocks after updating, and it was the last thing I've done before sleeping. Updating to newest one, waiting for a block.

edit: found a block within minutes now
full member
Activity: 138
Merit: 100
I also have found a block with the new miner.
full member
Activity: 158
Merit: 100
mine safe o/
My testrig is mining but haven't found a block yet. (32MHASH) 30 minutes of mining

I've just found a block with your new version.

GPU #1: found a solution, nonce $269F800E
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070, 9189 khash/s
accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 64761 khash/s (yay!!!)

Unfortunately, it was an orphan.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
what the problem that you found in previous version ?

If you run with --benchmark -D you will see the problem. I have many copies of my sourcecode, and since it was a long time since the spreadcoin update I changed the wrong source three wich contained a bug in the hash somwehere. I managed to locate the correct spreadminer 10 fixed 3 source, and apply the latest improvements there.

--benchmark -D now give you a correct hash output, so the new version should work. My testrig is mining but haven't found a block yet. (32MHASH) 30 minutes of mining
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
I have sendt a fixed version wich should find more blocks. Spreadminer 11 fixed final

Check your spam inboxes.


what the problem that you found in previous version ?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I have sendt a fixed version wich should find more blocks. Spreadminer 11 fixed final

Check your spam inboxes.
Jump to: