Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 390. (Read 2347659 times)

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I can understand pascal fix but other than that, what is the point for bbr-ccminer?

Dual mining.. Bbr+decred, bbr+lbry, bbr+pascal, bbr+sia
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
DASH is $78. I used to own a masternode when dash was down at $5... 1000 dash. Would had been worth $78,000 today... Sad
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Not sure if I am missing something but 970 did 1500 on bbr with basic overclocking and minerd, only needed to use wild_keccak_multi.cl on multi-gpu rigs.

I can understand pascal fix but other than that, what is the point for bbr-ccminer?
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
yeah they are pumping everything? more people into crypto maybe? well fuck fiat world i hope everyone come abroad in the crypto world, if that happen you would see at least 10x current profit if not 100...

Thats why you should keep some of the coins you mine. If you always dump, you will miss profit..

i'm still holding lbry btw, and some other, but too many is dangerous, not all of them get a pump
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
yeah they are pumping everything? more people into crypto maybe? well fuck fiat world i hope everyone come abroad in the crypto world, if that happen you would see at least 10x current profit if not 100...

Thats why you should keep some of the coins you mine. If you always dump, you will miss profit..
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
yeah they are pumping everything? more people into crypto maybe? well fuck fiat world i hope everyone come abroad in the crypto world, if that happen you would see at least 10x current profit if not 100...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Prices are going skyhigh now..

ethereum $27.5(+21.5%)
Zcash $46.5 (+20%)
monero $17.55(+6%)

etc...
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
a joke there are coin that are giving me $6 per day currently

But this coin cannot take 100 rigs Wink Wich coin btw?

i can't say here, actually there are two but one is not always that profit, some times is lower

yes they can't take many rig they are small coin but for 2-3 rig they are good
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
a joke there are coin that are giving me $6 per day currently

But this coin cannot take 100 rigs Wink Wich coin btw?
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072

Decred
$5.74 (+62.89%)

($2.42 per day on the gtx 1070)

a joke there are coin that are giving me $6 per day currently
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer

Decred
$5.74 (+62.89%)

($2.42 per day on the gtx 1070)
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
That's why I thought it was weird when Pallas was talking about having to mess with random read/writes. It's basically the same talk we got when Pascal first came out, then you guys figured out what to tweak and on almost every algo we ended up with the normal speeds, which is a 1070 is about 80% faster then a 970 and a 1060 is almost the same speed.

The 970 and 1070 both have a 256bit bus. so the difference will be smaller.
It would be similar to mining Ethereum with a small dagger size.

The gtx 970 does around 23MHASH, and the 1070 does around 30MHASH.  (the gtx 1070 is only around 30% faster than the gtx 970 in the ethereum algo)



So if the gtx 970 does 1400 in boolberry, the 1070 should do around 1820. My modded kernel is doing 1860..

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
I wasn't talking about the scratchpad. If you ran the miner on a 970 it got 1400.

Gpu #3 is running @ 1025, is it a bug or is this gpu clocked lower than the others? (Asus gpu #0 seems to be doing fine)

Boolberry need a good coreclock/memclock ratio. from 1000 to 1400 is a 40% increase.

Adjusting mem/core clock, and finding the optimal launchconfig is the key here. Modding the code is not enough...

The monitor is attached to that GPU.

You're just making up a bunch of random stuff now, I have quite a few 970s across multiple rigs. They all get around 1400.

The whole reason the 1060 was so slow (as per your post) is because the codebase was never updated for Pascal. The codebase (Wolf0s miner) is from 2014-15. Pascal wasn't out then. The old miner just needed to be retuned for Pascal as with all the other miners when Pascal came out, they had to be retuned for the new GPU architecture.

That's why I thought it was weird when Pallas was talking about having to mess with random read/writes. It's basically the same talk we got when Pascal first came out, then you guys figured out what to tweak and on almost every algo we ended up with the normal speeds, which is a 1070 is about 80% faster then a 970 and a 1060 is almost the same speed.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I wasn't talking about the scratchpad. If you ran the miner on a 970 it got 1400.

Gpu #3 is running @ 1025, is it a bug or is this gpu clocked lower than the others? (Asus gpu #0 seems to be doing fine)

Boolberry need a good coreclock/memclock ratio. from 1000 to 1400 is a 40% increase.

Adjusting mem/core clock, and finding the optimal launchconfig is the key here. Modding the code is not enough...
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Original miner got 1400 on a 970, 2500 on a 1070 is about right with almost no changes to the code and updating it to Pascal.

But ccminer 2.0 only does 1500 and not 2500 on the gtx 1070.

The scratchpad is 230MB now. In the early days (2014), the scratchpad was smaller, and you got more cachehits in the random access and more speed.



I wasn't talking about the scratchpad. If you ran the miner on a 970 it got 1400. Same thing for Epsylons 2.0. The 1060 and 1070 were so bad because the original miner was never upgraded for Pascal. Wolf0s miner is pre-Pascal. Maxwell still worked perfectly fine. You basically aren't showing a speed increase, but rather a bug fix that I've been asking for for months, including in PMs to you.



That isn't on 2.0, it's on the version I got from Epsylon last September.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Original miner got 1400 on a 970, 2500 on a 1070 is about right with almost no changes to the code and updating it to Pascal.

But ccminer 2.0 only does 1500 and not 2500 on the gtx 1070.

The scratchpad is 230MB now. In the early days (2014), the scratchpad was smaller, and you got more cachehits in the random access and more speed.

The gtx 970 is doing around 1000.

ccminer v2.0 RC2 opensource - Boolberry
Palit GTX 1070
Core Clock +0   - 1500 kh/s
Core Clock +60 - 1800 kh/s (stable work)





legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
I don't think I will sell this kernel. Bether to harvest with my farm... nice speed on the 1060 3gb. the 1070 need some more work..

What does the opensource miner do?

Wow so what was the point of commissioning Epsylon to fix the stratum and then continually talk about it in this thread for the last six months? I already mentioned that the code was broken for Pascal and I'm sure that wasn't that hard of a fix. I also mentioned that it would be pretty profitable multiple times.

Original miner got 1400 on a 970, 2500 on a 1070 is about right with almost no changes to the code and updating it to Pascal.

And no, a 1060 isn't representative of original speeds. 1060 is also Pascal and was also operating at half speed.
hero member
Activity: 1022
Merit: 500
Few bucks in a day,and small place to get more.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
3000mhash ( $2.17) per day
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
Decred $5.01 (+45.37%)...

What speed GTX 1070
Jump to: