Decred $5.01 (+45.37%)...
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 391. (Read 2347659 times)
ccminer v2.0 RC2 opensource - Boolberry
Palit GTX 1070
Core Clock +0 - 1500 kh/s
Core Clock +60 - 1800 kh/s (stable work)
https://pp.userapi.com/c626129/v626129062/4bfe3/NO60T7zeQPc.jpg
Palit GTX 1070
Core Clock +0 - 1500 kh/s
Core Clock +60 - 1800 kh/s (stable work)
https://pp.userapi.com/c626129/v626129062/4bfe3/NO60T7zeQPc.jpg
What does the opensource miner do?
ccminer 2.0 opensource does 850khash on the gtx 1060 3gb.
sp-mod #1 is 60% faster..
[2017-03-10 13:46:57] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070: 34603008 hashes, 1596.13 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:46:57] accepted: 19/20 (95.00%), 4255 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:08] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070: 16777216 hashes, 1595.91 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:08] accepted: 20/21 (95.24%), 4255 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070: 57671680 hashes, 1595.77 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:12] accepted: 21/22 (95.45%), 4782 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:16] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070: 6291456 hashes, 1596.09 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:16] accepted: 22/23 (95.65%), 4783 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:31] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070: 36700160 hashes, 1595.99 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:31] accepted: 23/24 (95.83%), 4783 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070: 95420417 hashes, 1592.41 kh/s
TDP 100W.
slight code modification.
[2017-03-10 13:46:57] accepted: 19/20 (95.00%), 4255 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:08] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070: 16777216 hashes, 1595.91 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:08] accepted: 20/21 (95.24%), 4255 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:12] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070: 57671680 hashes, 1595.77 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:12] accepted: 21/22 (95.45%), 4782 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:16] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1070: 6291456 hashes, 1596.09 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:16] accepted: 22/23 (95.65%), 4783 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:31] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1070: 36700160 hashes, 1595.99 kh/s
[2017-03-10 13:47:31] accepted: 23/24 (95.83%), 4783 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2017-03-10 13:47:37] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1070: 95420417 hashes, 1592.41 kh/s
TDP 100W.
slight code modification.
Is this with overclocking?
I don't think I will sell this kernel. Bether to harvest with my farm... nice speed on the 1060 3gb. the 1070 need some more work..
What does the opensource miner do?
What does the opensource miner do?
Boolberry sp-mod #1 early results..
1070 1850Khash/s (60% tdp)
1060 3gb 1360Khash/s (60% tdp)
1070 1850Khash/s (60% tdp)
1060 3gb 1360Khash/s (60% tdp)
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
Then you can finally stop violating the license!
Only if the bins are written from scratch, otherwise they include GPL code.
And the cycle continues...
I guess it just makes it easier to believe he (and other developers) rewrote a kernel from scratch then the entire miner. Whatever floats everyones boat. XD
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
now THAT is the FIRST thing you have written that makes sense ...
AND is not an attack on those that support you ( basically the community ) by calling then disgusting names ...
as long as the bins are not gpl 'infected' ( as wolf would put it ) - then you are doing the right thing ... for once ...
btw - i dont 'move to another thread' ... you KNOW better than anyone else how involved i have been and still am in the mining industry - especially when YOU first started out and was asking for help ALL the time ... you KNOW how involved i have been with YOU and all the needs YOU had ... no longer now - admittedly - but that is YOUR doing due to your innate greed for btc and growth of your own farm ...
so no 'moving' to any thread - as i ALWAYS watch this thread and others ...
so you will stop breaking the gpl license? ... believe me we would all like to see this ... and with what you mentioned - sounds like a plan too
...#crysx
+1 Then you can finally stop violating the license! open source with no fee is good for everyone.. i would be running your sp_ lbry_mod-ccminer in my current build as it is about 4%faster in my test's but i cant force my self to add a version of ccminer to my build with a built in FEE just doesnt feel right..
Regards
#Nemo
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
now THAT is the FIRST thing you have written that makes sense ...
AND is not an attack on those that support you ( basically the community ) by calling then disgusting names ...
as long as the bins are not gpl 'infected' ( as wolf would put it ) - then you are doing the right thing ... for once ...
btw - i dont 'move to another thread' ... you KNOW better than anyone else how involved i have been and still am in the mining industry - especially when YOU first started out and was asking for help ALL the time ... you KNOW how involved i have been with YOU and all the needs YOU had ... no longer now - admittedly - but that is YOUR doing due to your innate greed for btc and growth of your own farm ...
so no 'moving' to any thread - as i ALWAYS watch this thread and others ...
so you will stop breaking the gpl license? ... believe me we would all like to see this ... and with what you mentioned - sounds like a plan too
...#crysx
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
Then you can finally stop violating the license!
Only if the bins are written from scratch, otherwise they include GPL code.
that would be a positive thing indeed 
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN--
Miners want a better miner. If you can package your personal code in a way to keep it distinct from others work, it may quiet the complaints.
The constant sour grapes and nasty grumbling is a pain. --scryptr
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
that is an idea.. better than doing fake commits which doesnt work
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
What sort of speed are you getting?
The wild keccak in ccminer 2.0 is a replica of wolf0's boolberry cudaminer.
Epsylon have integrated the code i into ccminer without giving wolf0 the credit.
I am working on a faster kernel. A faster kernel is more profit. How the optimalizations are done isn't important..
Epsylon have integrated the code i into ccminer without giving wolf0 the credit.
I am working on a faster kernel. A faster kernel is more profit. How the optimalizations are done isn't important..
How could it not be important, if there are strict regulations about intellectual property that are in place to avoid the exploitation of other works, for personal gains?
It's, instead, one of the fundamental points; there isn't even any percentage contribution to the creators of the initial, opensource, project if I've understood correctly (please confirm or deny if possible, it's important).
The protection of the intellectual property it's a fundamental requirement of a software product, you should remember too that you were angry toward others, that tried to resell your optimization of the opensource kernels.
The question is: is anyone allowed to modify an opensource project and resell it without giving anything to the original creators? As you can understand, it's not.
You know what's great about GPL code? You change a couple lines, edit a few variables, it's no longer someone else's code. It only applies when you copy paste. People do it all the time.
Coding is one of the things that ISNT strictly enforced. In order to enforce GPL coding you need a lot of money and a lot of lawyer. You also need to build a ecosystem up around it (like Java for instance, which is an entire programming language and system), otherwise it's really not that different. Someone can just look at it and go 'oh this is different'.
This is actually for the best. You wouldn't want to have to keep recreating the wheel over and over again. This is also why if you want something protected you try to encrypt it as much as possible, like Claymores work for instance. Nicehash failed at that one and EWBF just copied the fuck out of their shit and no one really cared.
Epsylon does have a system for paying him, which is voluntarily using his pool, which I do on every occasion I get as well as donate to him, so I don't feel too badly for him. Yiimp is a very solid pool as well so that's a benefit.
So many words without purpose..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
chrysophylax has moved to the other thread. I did a vector instruction rewrite of the boolberry kernel.
Nice speedup. I am modding ccminer to load cubin kernels directly. Then I can opensource ccminer, and sell bin files.
The binfiles will work on linux too. No need for exe files..
It will be nearly impossible to control those opensource manipulations. Even big companies do it often.
But you can avoid buying it ;-)
But you can avoid buying it ;-)
the difference with big companies - and sp is that the big companies supply the source with the binaries ...
sp does not ...
that my friend - is something that is the fundamental issue here ... which is THE reason we CANNOT supply binaries to the public for our faster miner ( yup - faster than yours sp ) to the general public WITHOUT supplying the sourcecode with it ... if we did - we would be doing the SAME thing as sp - and screwing EVERYONE for btc for the miner ... we DONT - we WONT - and as such - we stay within the guidelines of the opensource license ...
it will be a different thing altogether though - when we bring out OUR miner - that IS copyrighted and private with no opensource licensing ...
different indeed ...
o - and it WILL be the property of cwi ... ( you know that thread where i supposedly talk to myself - yup that one duboisi ) ... and it MAY be released to the general public on a global level in a law abiding way - selling it - if we take that route ... especially now we have caught the attention of a software company worth its weight in gold ...
#crysx
I think I will make a Boolberry (XBB) windows miner this weekend. Anybody instested?
the only question is, is it profitable?
0.012 with a rig, not bad, i could be interested if you can reach 2MH per 1070 at least or more, currently i can do 1.7MH
after sp has finished raping it with his farm? ...
THEN 'develops' ( copies code and changes a few settings ) the bbr miner? ...
not likely ...
the moment sp mentions a coin he wants to 'work' on - we mine the complete opposite ...
i used to be such an advocate for opensource - until i see what sp has been doing copying code - and 'improving' it then releasing 'his' code - ( actually modified 'their' code ) as a PRIVATE release ... which is why we took everything internally and inhouse ONLY now ... and still kick the butt off some of the algos you say you are the fastest in - sp ...
i asked you to join us for the opensource release of the miner a long time ago - and your response was simply - 'no - i am building my own farm' ... wow ... nice 'help' to the community mate ... and still no contact from you at all - after saying you will sort all this out with me regarding the promises made ... shows the type of commitment you have sp ...
and before the imbecile starts about me whining for free stuff - go fuck yourself ( or get fucked by a gimp ) with a very angry large porcupine that has breath bentard ... without vaseline - in open field - being filmed - and published on youtube ... and enjoy it more than you normally would ...
dont worry - ill convince the porcupine ( and gimp ) that you are worth it ...
there! ... that should be an appropriate response to ALL future comments - questions - and posts that you direct towards me ...
#crysx
Don't encourage him. Everything he says is just manipulation and posturing to get his way. Being a hypocrite is given. Of course it doesn't make sense if you actually look at what he says and question it. It's bait for the small fry to buy into, then he tries to bulldog down anyone that questions it with his page long run on / fragments that essentially add up to nothing meaningful.
Can you actually ban people from threads you moderate SP? I haven't even suggested this for Amph. While Amph is a idiot, Chyr is manipulatively destructive. There is literally nothing of value he's brought either to this thread or the community he's bitching about. He just tries to tear things apart by pitting people against each other to eventually get you on his 'payroll' which I'm sure amounts to peanuts.
I admittedly buy miners and suggest work to developers (in addition to even offering to pay for it depending on what it is). There is definitely a right and wrong professional way to do things and Chr just tries to fuck with you to get you to do what he wants.
and just wait and see what cwi is becoming duboisi ...
enough for even a person like you to engage in ... no matter how much you wish you wouldnt - or how much you wish to slag it ...
at least its a business now - and a growing effective one - that is running WITHIN the rules and the law - not breaking them ...
soon ... very soon ... so slag away mate ...
#crysx
It will be nearly impossible to control those opensource manipulations. Even big companies do it often.
But you can avoid buying it ;-)
But you can avoid buying it ;-)
The wild keccak in ccminer 2.0 is a replica of wolf0's boolberry cudaminer.
Epsylon have integrated the code i into ccminer without giving wolf0 the credit.
I am working on a faster kernel. A faster kernel is more profit. How the optimalizations are done isn't important..
Epsylon have integrated the code i into ccminer without giving wolf0 the credit.
I am working on a faster kernel. A faster kernel is more profit. How the optimalizations are done isn't important..
How could it not be important, if there are strict regulations about intellectual property that are in place to avoid the exploitation of other works, for personal gains?
It's, instead, one of the fundamental points; there isn't even any percentage contribution to the creators of the initial, opensource, project if I've understood correctly (please confirm or deny if possible, it's important).
The protection of the intellectual property it's a fundamental requirement of a software product, you should remember too that you were angry toward others, that tried to resell your optimization of the opensource kernels.
The question is: is anyone allowed to modify an opensource project and resell it without giving anything to the original creators? As you can understand, it's not.
Thanks for this new word: fuckwit ..that was what I was searching for long time :-D
Btw. Does anyone felt lost in all the re-quote of the quotes of the re-quotes?
Btw. Does anyone felt lost in all the re-quote of the quotes of the re-quotes?
Jump to: