CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 437.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 28, 2017, 08:04:12 AM

Not sure why you guys keep quoting payment estimations. You can just type that into cryptocompare and gives you the same results, once again depending on nethash which is all over the fucking place and doesn't seem to be a accurate place for it yet (which is also why whattomines calculator isn't up yet).

Because more ways of estimating earnings gives us a better overall picture. And because the difficulty is the most reliable factor, not nethashrate.

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

When pool hashrate is much higher than network, it may be due to a high number of orphans, so be careful when you do your own math.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Not sure why you guys keep quoting payment estimations. You can just type that into cryptocompare and gives you the same results, once again depending on nethash which is all over the fucking place and doesn't seem to be a accurate place for it yet (which is also why whattomines calculator isn't up yet).

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Currently 10 Gh/s a day will get you:
- based on the in-wallet block explorer's network hashrate (7 Th/s): 41 coins
- based on the difficulty calculation (current target): 39 coins
- based on nanopool's hashrate (11 Th/s) combined with the fact that they find roughly 90% of all blocks: 24 coins.

So with a single 1070 at 800 Mh/s you earn somewhere between $1.19-$2.04.

So it was both fun and frustrating while it lasted for nvidia.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

The best moment to hop in ZEC again its going up and since the hash is down the rewards getting more.^^that said I made 0,2zec more since last day.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: sp_ on January 28, 2017, 06:40:59 AM

Not yet. Nanopool is finding 85% of the Blocks now. The total hashrate reported in the Client is 6.9THASH. But nanopool report 11,772THASH alone. I think the real net hash is around 14THASH.

so 10 days to find a block with 5 giga which is around the speed of one rig(1070), this mean 0.008 per day, not worth it....

7enuke

member

Activity: 107

Merit: 10

REDDCoin - Great return

Quote from: ioglnx on January 28, 2017, 04:29:46 AM

KlausT was active and implemented already pascalcoin into his CCminer branch tonight with primitive stratum support.
But I already tried the build and it's doesn't seem to work against nanopools pascalcoin pool

you have this wndows release ?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Not yet. Nanopool is finding 85% of the Blocks now. The total hashrate reported in the Client is 6.9THASH. But nanopool report 11,772THASH alone. I think the real net hash is around 14THASH.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1072

Quote from: sp_ on January 28, 2017, 04:30:28 AM

The hashrate bug was fixed in the Klaus-t fork.

Difficulty has risen 400% in 12 hours because of nanopool. Not profitable any more..

link tot he fixed version? can it mine on pool also?

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

CPU utilization needs to be improved immensely in the miners. Pretty sure that's what's messing with the hashrate the most.

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

Only for big farm owners like you :-D

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

The hashrate bug was fixed in the Klaus-t fork.

Difficulty has risen 400% in 12 hours because of nanopool. Not profitable any more..

ioglnx

sr. member

Activity: 574

Merit: 250

Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum

KlausT was active and implemented already pascalcoin into his CCminer branch tonight with primitive stratum support.
But I already tried the build and it's doesn't seem to work against nanopools pascalcoin pool

redmonski

full member

Activity: 201

Merit: 100

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 27, 2017, 11:53:23 PM

If the miner goes negative does that mean it's not hashing properly anymore? It still seems to be submitting nonces and the wallet keeps accepting them... It happens often enough where I don't feel like constantly rebooting machines.

https://github.com/Vorksholk/PascalCoin-CUDA/blob/master/kernel.cu

268 // Only used for determining hashrate, and it's this method's fault that the hashrate sometimes shows as negative (this "rolls over" since nothing over the hour is used in creating the relative time
269 long getTimeMillis()

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

If the miner goes negative does that mean it's not hashing properly anymore? It still seems to be submitting nonces and the wallet keeps accepting them... It happens often enough where I don't feel like constantly rebooting machines.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Nano is showing 9.7TH for me. Block explorer is 4.7TH.

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

My wallet shows 5.6GH right now (positive), block explorer 4.7GH (again positive) and nanopool 3.9GH (Yup, positive). Scotchtape just like bensam said...

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Hey look the block explorer hashrate is negative too as Nanopool has more hashrate on the pool! Hue hue hue... In soviet russia, block explorer mines you!

Seriously fucked up coin. There is a lot of problems with this. I'm definitely confident the net hashrate has never once been correct on any sources.

BTW apparently some of my 970s are producing 1500Mhs... Totally legit. ~_~

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Apparently with the new miner your hashrate can go negative now too...

Code:

    The hash is:
00000000 0876e67b 40553183 13afbbe1 68f8aa5c d0907242 9e679a7a 8d151b83
Found nonce: d1bb752c    T: 588bde42    Hashrate: 417.430 MH/s   Total: 18
 Real: 58DF0000CA02200011B252E7F87A379B07C4BE09828B3908398DFE2142EF9B243F42
2CB5F26200099D14487407CC264B57D27A2CC21A7634EDFDDE8D2DEF3A311BBEE9D5B54929D
F00000000000100010094B1B0316C6174696E7530383030B89DF9E4AC7539040A6CA738C63C
973265BA020691EAAE9DACB9D3471DFE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B
495991B7852B85500000000000000000000000
 Real: 59DF0000CA02200011B252E7F87A379B07C4BE09828B3908398DFE2142EF9B243F42
2CB5F26200099D14487407CC264B57D27A2CC21A7634EDFDDE8D2DEF3A311BBEE9D5B54929D
F000000000001000100F70BB4316C6174696E7530383030D72FD6B135314BB9608DF73DF597
965BFD50133959CB93C8E898824D00CE3B0C44298FC1C149AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B
495991B7852B85500000000000000000000000
    The hash is:
00000000 08d26acd e8cc82d1 e33b3a9d 68dcb540 8ed2caa6 818007dd 4b927497
Found nonce: 05fbd016    T: 588bdf31    Hashrate: -14.942 MH/s   Total: 19
    The hash is:
00000000 0fa482db 2d7410d9 f52ed544 09ddde82 6b648851 063735f2 62dc75b2
Found nonce: 7690bc22    T: 588bdf53    Hashrate: -15.735 MH/s   Total: 20
    The hash is:
00000000 0a9b3600 a8e4edb7 268853c0 5933344e 15d6f2aa 60ca8247 43c9e5cf
Found nonce: 1b08e00d    T: 588bdf7f    Hashrate: -16.530 MH/s   Total: 21
    The hash is:
00000000 08b47ad6 a945981b 9839d04b cc36e498 fe7135c2 fa1a4778 ce7194f6
Found nonce: 7cdc282d    T: 588be08a    Hashrate: -17.373 MH/s   Total: 22

Happens on multiple machines. Shortly there after one of the miners on a multi GPU system will crash. Others still seem to be mining fine, submitting their negative hashrate.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: bathrobehero on January 27, 2017, 06:22:53 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 27, 2017, 06:02:28 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 27, 2017, 05:42:30 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 27, 2017, 05:29:47 PM

Yeah, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this fucked up miner. Do you need one wallet per computer? Importing the miner key mines all to the same account, correct?

I've tried just using one wallet, but it looks like it duplicates work for miners named the same thing prefix01. Using multiple wallets with the same miner key and miner name still yields to the same nonces being submitted by the same worker name.

Does each rig need one wallet with each a different miner name?

I get the same problem...i ru n one proxy on each rig and they get the same workername as the other rigs and work on duplicate data. So i think i need to create 1 key for each of my rigs.. 1 wallet, but one key/name for each of the rigs

So wallets/minername doesn't matter, but the keys do? I thought each key is a wallet?

Quote from: bathrobehero on January 27, 2017, 05:52:28 PM

Yeah, each my rigs have different keys.

How can you have one wallet and multiple rigs with different keys?

If you have one wallet with one miner name, look at the payload name (which is the miner name and 01-05 for each device) and nonces, they're duplicated about 50% of the time across multiple machines.

I don't get what you're saying.

I have different miner names.
Rig1 - bathr001
Rig2 - bathr002
with 6 GPU each so the payload for the 3rd card in the second rig is bathr00203.

I wonder if running two miner instances per GPU (which is much faster) would work.

That's what I was originally asking. You have a different miner name for each rig. Only way to do this is with a different wallet on each rig, otherwise the wallet wont accept the work. You can't mine from one PC to another using the same miner name or it starts duplicating the work. Pretty sure this is why I didn't find any blocks.

There is reference to this back in Oct in the Pasc thread as well, I didn't think it was still a issue. I don't think AMD miners suffer from this. The bandaid 'fix' they made was making each miner through the proxy add +1 to the miner name so the '03', but if you have multiple rigs, it still duplicates work.

This coin is such a piece of shit.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 437. (Read 2347659 times)