Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 47. (Read 2347588 times)
i see that there is a varian ot the cyrptonight v7 algo, it's called heavy there is any mod for this? what are the speed? it's worth to mine with this over the v7?
Could you, please provide link to download stable version of SPMOD 2?
the lux sp-mod #2 doesn't have a link. Private distribution only.
@SP_
May You to compile Raven x16r/x16s mod with CUDA 9.2 support?
It may be intresting solution.
May You to compile Raven x16r/x16s mod with CUDA 9.2 support?
It may be intresting solution.
A few percent Faster than cuda 9.1 with some small adjustments. Mostly register tuning. Cuda 9.2 is spilling more registers, and this is hurting the performance in some algos.
I have now reached 41.5MHASH in the pi algos on the 1080ti. A nice 0-5-1MHASH bost from phi sp-mod #2. (lux coin)
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
https://image.ibb.co/hsNLGx/lux_sp_mod2.png
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
https://image.ibb.co/hsNLGx/lux_sp_mod2.png
Could you, please provide link to download stable version of SPMOD 2?
Have fun while it lasts. Completely new algo coming to LUX at block 300K
What algorithm is LUX forking to?
Is there any information released about how the algorithm works?
Have fun while it lasts. Completely new algo coming to LUX at block 300K
What algorithm is LUX forking to?
Have fun while it lasts. Completely new algo coming to LUX at block 300K
What algorithm is LUX forking to?
Have fun while it lasts. Completely new algo coming to LUX at block 300K
I have now reached 41.5MHASH in the pi algos on the 1080ti. A nice 0-5-1MHASH bost from phi sp-mod #2. (lux coin)
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
When will you release the new sp-mod #3?here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
Dude that is the best bitcoin address ever!
I have now reached 41.5MHASH in the pi algos on the 1080ti. A nice 0-5-1MHASH bost from phi sp-mod #2. (lux coin)
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
When will you release the new sp-mod #3? here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
@SP_
May You to compile Raven x16r/x16s mod with CUDA 9.2 support?
It may be intresting solution.
May You to compile Raven x16r/x16s mod with CUDA 9.2 support?
It may be intresting solution.
I have now reached 41.5MHASH in the pi algos on the 1080ti. A nice 0-5-1MHASH bost from phi sp-mod #2. (lux coin)
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
here is a snapshot from lux sp-mod #2 :
You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
You saying that it is, doesn't make it true
...period
I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about.
Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it.
you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36628995
and the first post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35471685
I'd suggest you stop acting like a hypocrite, it goes a long way for credibility.
Also where does that come into play in this thread when you just talk about 'rounds'? A round on a pool is the work on a certain block. I'm sorry for not reading your mind and your ambiguous terminology that you make up on the spot that's already used for other technical definitions. Or do you talk about hours in such a way to convey a certain amount of self-import regarding you turning a miner on?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool#Proportional
Maybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you actually talk about it?
Jesus I'm not even going to start tearing down your test results, right off the bat you think setting intensity on three different miners is the same thing? Different miners can run at different intensities and contribute the same amount of work or some with less intensity then another running with more depending on how they're coded. That's why the intensity tuning game is still very much a part of being an experienced miner... or for the sake of testing you run them at default, whatever that is, however doesn't represent a tuned rig. A good tester would find the optimal intensity for all miners they're testing.
You're obviously an idiot or troll, or both; I choose not to engage in a discussion with either.
Person provides points, just act like they don't have any merit because they're a 'troll' then move on. Yup. Also 'woops' with the intensity bit, guess you'll have to do a bit more research.
I'm sharing code on github opensource for all of you to enjoy. I am adding some juice and releasing a faster x16r exe soon.
Free no devfee. spmod-git #4A
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases
Free no devfee. spmod-git #4A
https://github.com/sp-hash/suprminer/releases
I receive cpu validation error on bitcore, x16s and timetravel (keccak) using spmod-git #4a on 1080ti and ryzen 1700. Other than it's faster than 2.2.5 miner.
Someone used gtx 980ti with spmod or 2.2.5 version and can share best overclock settings?
On what algo? 
Someone used gtx 980ti with spmod or 2.2.5 version and can share best overclock settings?
On what algo? You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
You saying that it is, doesn't make it true
...period
I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about.
Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it.
you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36628995
and the first post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35471685
I'd suggest you stop acting like a hypocrite, it goes a long way for credibility.
Also where does that come into play in this thread when you just talk about 'rounds'? A round on a pool is the work on a certain block. I'm sorry for not reading your mind and your ambiguous terminology that you make up on the spot that's already used for other technical definitions. Or do you talk about hours in such a way to convey a certain amount of self-import regarding you turning a miner on?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool#Proportional
Maybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you actually talk about it?
Jesus I'm not even going to start tearing down your test results, right off the bat you think setting intensity on three different miners is the same thing? Different miners can run at different intensities and contribute the same amount of work or some with less intensity then another running with more depending on how they're coded. That's why the intensity tuning game is still very much a part of being an experienced miner... or for the sake of testing you run them at default, whatever that is, however doesn't represent a tuned rig. A good tester would find the optimal intensity for all miners they're testing.
You're obviously an idiot or troll, or both; I choose not to engage in a discussion with either.
You can't fucking run x16r for a hour and figure out what's the fastest. You better be doing roughly 24 hours of testing before doing that. I mention that because I've seen pretty big swings over the course of 24 hours, we're talking pool side, not client side. Client side testing is pointless.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
Don't be a dumbass and make three pages out of a half of one. No one wants to read your loud screams.
Also take a dose of your own humility.
You saying that it is, doesn't make it true
...period
I'd suggest you stay out of a discussion you know very little about.
Reading comprehension, goes a long way. look into it.
you can start by reading this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.36628995
and the first post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.35471685
I'd suggest you stop acting like a hypocrite, it goes a long way for credibility.
Also where does that come into play in this thread when you just talk about 'rounds'? A round on a pool is the work on a certain block. I'm sorry for not reading your mind and your ambiguous terminology that you make up on the spot that's already used for other technical definitions. Or do you talk about hours in such a way to convey a certain amount of self-import regarding you turning a miner on?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mining_pool#Proportional
Maybe you should figure out what you're talking about before you actually talk about it?
Jesus I'm not even going to start tearing down your test results, right off the bat you think setting intensity on three different miners is the same thing? Different miners can run at different intensities and contribute the same amount of work or some with less intensity then another running with more depending on how they're coded. That's why the intensity tuning game is still very much a part of being an experienced miner... or for the sake of testing you run them at default, whatever that is, however doesn't represent a tuned rig. A good tester would find the optimal intensity for all miners they're testing.
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
all your claims about your "fastest" private miners were beaten by Enemy. And Enemy is not the best Cuda coder )) Just imagine what speed private alexis miner has )) Unfortunately enemy does not work on c11.
The sp-mod private is the fastest, why do you ask?
all your claims about your "fastest" private miners were beaten by Enemy. And Enemy is not the best Cuda coder )) Just imagine what speed private alexis miner has )) Jump to: