Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 499. (Read 2347659 times)
That's because the zcash dropped another 13% today on a 1MUSD volume
hm... 
according to whattomine zec has less profit than eth mining at least for my GTX 970
according to whattomine zec has less profit than eth mining at least for my GTX 970
There is a bug if you use the -cd parameter with more than 8 numbers. Number 9, 10... and upwards will be ignored.
No have a bug in my release, use -cd 0 1 for 2 gtx 1070 , and have 110 sol for gtx 1070 with 220 sol total .
i dont find the -i parameter in help.
what´s -i 0 0 ??
what´s -i 0 0 ??
Sorry the parameter for 2 threads on one gpu is -cd 0 0
2 threads per gpu
There is a bug that only allow 8 threads. Will fix it later.
-cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 will run with 2 threads pr gpu in a 4 card rig.
i dont find the -i parameter in help.
what´s -i 0 0 ??
what´s -i 0 0 ??
4x970 went from ~300 (zawawawa-r6) to ~340, oc + p0, tdp 85-95%, W7 + i5. Cpu usage max 3%.
the only problem i still see is that the hashrate fluctuate too much from 630 sol to 680+, but this was true in any build, so something isn't done properly in the code
The statistics is the average of the shares found in 30 seconds. I should increase this to 2000seconds in the next builds. I use 30 secs when developing to check if the cards trottle and get instant feedback on the speed.
Anybody tested it on the 970 yet? 960 is untested. What do you get?
Nice one, thanks!
A 5 x 970 rig fluctuates between 357-388 (so 71.4-77.6) after the initial climb (2-3 minutes). Every silentarmy build I tried fluctuates quite a bit. 130W per card.
Some notes:
- it looks like the -cv parameter doesn't work; it always uses silentarmy (not an issue);
- the maximum card/thread number is 8 (for example nothing matters after -cd 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3);
- forcing AVX2 (-e 2) even if the CPU doesn't support it (and obviously not CPU mining, -t 0) seems to give a small boost.
the only problem i still see is that the hashrate fluctuate too much from 630 sol to 680+, but this was true in any build, so something isn't done properly in the code
I have uploaded a new version with the cuda dll included.
nheqminer -t 8 -e 2 -cs -cd 0 0 -ct 126 -cb 140i5-6600k and 1060 6gb giving speed fron ~110 to ~120
What do you get with -t 0 on the 1060 6gb?
I have uploaded a new version with the cuda dll included.
nheqminer -t 8 -e 2 -cs -cd 0 0 -ct 126 -cb 140i5-6600k and 1060 6gb giving speed fron ~110 to ~120
What do you get with -t 0 on the 1060 6gb?
4x1070 G1, 100%, 0,-502... 420sols .. well done, sp
it´s just a bit slower than nicehash miner rlsed today
it´s just a bit slower than nicehash miner rlsed today
Did you try with -i 0 0 (2 threads pr gpu just like the claymore miner) if you have a good processor might give a boost.
Anybody tested it on the 970 yet? 960 is untested. What do you get?
4x1070 G1, 100%, 0,-502... 420sols .. well done, sp
it´s just a bit slower than nicehash miner rlsed today
it´s just a bit slower than nicehash miner rlsed today
maybe ... but with recent btc rise and zec&zcl fall I'm feeling ok mining to btc-address )) I don't like to test pools and exchanges. I like to test hardware , bioses and miners ))
How much do you get if you OC? sp-mod #1?
maybe ... but with recent btc rise and zec&zcl fall I'm feeling ok mining to btc-address )) I don't like to test pools and exchanges. I like to test hardware , bioses and miners ))
How much do you get if you OC? sp-mod #1?
nicehash private miner is 1-2 sols faster on my poor gtx750 1gb ))
But you loose 30% of the profit if you mine at nicehash. My version works on all pools
nicehash private miner is 1-2 sols faster on my poor gtx750 1gb ))
But you loose 30% of the profit if you mine at nicehash. My version works on all pools
I have uploaded a new version with the cuda dll included.
gives me error 0x000007bor something like that
does it require avx cpu?
nicehash private miner is 1-2 sols faster on my poor gtx750 1gb ))
Jump to: