Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 507. (Read 2347659 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
zclassic is not too far from etheruem now, there is still profit and it consume less, i still prefer to mine it over thereum due to not need to overclock my memory too much

You mean far behind? You have to have really expensive power for it to be close. I'm making $2.3 per 1070 at 32hash before power.

$2.3 mean that you pay basically zero electricity, sure i have not zero electricity, at leats by looking at whattomine, it say around $2 with a single 1070

As I've mentioned multiple times, $.1 KWH. That's AVERAGE for the US. That's not low and it's not high. Equihash is now making $1.47 pure revenue. That's why no one includes electricity costs, because it's different for everyone. You ALWAYS include electricity, regardless of your ridiculously high costs that most people don't have because they're operating close to the AVERAGE.


Weird how many times I have to respond in this thread to people saying the same stuff and asking the same questions. Ethereum is with a 700mhz OC. You can earn a extra $.3 per 1070 by dual mining. Equihash was more profitable for a bit, but it's back to Ethereum.

yes, but after I push it to 100 Smiley

Getting 80 right now on SA5. Claymore v6 is promising 200sol on a nano.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
yes, but after I push it to 100 Smiley
member
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

I have fixed it now. I have started modding, and get 50 sol/s on the gtx 970 and 75sol/s on the 1070 standard clocks.
The power usage is only 60Watt in the wall for the 970 and 95W on the 1070.
Any chance for you to publish your fixed miner? Smiley
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

I have fixed it now. I have started modding, and get 50 sol/s on the gtx 970 and 75sol/s on the 1070 standard clocks.
The power usage is only 60Watt in the wall for the 970 and 95W on the 1070.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.

@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?

what you mean best way, you just need to overclock the mem to 600+ with dagger, and you should be ale to reach 32MH

last tiem i tried it was something like 55% tdp +100 core +600mem or 800+
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
Interesting don't have any issue..but I do not even include tromp in the build just XENONCAT and SILENTARMY :-D as i stated
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 105
doesn't work..

I am testing on gtx 970




Maybe It is because different numbers of SM on 970, but I hardcoded BLOCKS and THREADS number, due to silentarmy algo worksize=NR_ROWS, so in cuda blocks=NR_ROWS/THREAD_PER_BLOCK. I don't have 970 cards, but a have 980, will take a look tomorrow.

UPD. It seems you are running with bad options, because launching cuda_tromp_STUB
Start options are buggy, only works with

Code:
./nheqminer_cuda_sa -t 0 -cv 0 -cd 0 -cs -l SERVER:PORT -u USERNAME

UPD2.

Tpruvot added my port to his repo. I think, he fixed launch bugs.

https://github.com/tpruvot/nheqminer/tree/cuda-silentarmy
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?

Same as with every other gpu. Find a pool that works for you. Find a miner that works for you.

If you have enough hashing power and a low latency network connection you should go solo. Solo doesn't mean eth only in claymore's miner.

legendary
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1051
ICO? Not even once.
sp_: didn't i mentioned only GTX10xx ;-D
Where is your colored output.

I compiled only SM61,CM61 you need a SM52 right?

This is great, a 6 x 1070 rig climbs up to ~490 sol/s (so 81.6 per card) in a minute or so then it's slowly decreasing and slowly fluctuating between 462-475.

Could you please compile a version with SM50? For 750 Ti support.
legendary
Activity: 1504
Merit: 1002
Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.

@antantti what is the best way to mine Eth (dagger I assume?) for 1070's?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Right now 32MH on dagger earns more than 140s/s equihash.

Fast cuda equihashminer has fallen from 'urgently needed' to 'nice to have' category.
member
Activity: 142
Merit: 10
tested on 1080 with -t 0 , single card 66-70 sols , basically same as Zawawas r6 cygwin version. not able to test on 1070 box , no AVX2 in maining rigs
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
The diff on many pools increased lately..and some pools have strange bumps of hashing power one e.g sometimes 4197276.29 Sol/s and you get nothing from the cake and next moment its 50% less.
Big farms are playing bad with us private miners :-(
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
pool didnot reported above 470 , switched back to eth!
Ok I will try second instance!
Yes second instance gave the silentarmy results , arround 510-520 (250+258)
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
yes it is with samsung ram , which if i want for test can reach +1000 , which is amazing!
This miner iof yours reached 480 and than started to go down 450? I don`t know why!

Pool diff increases ..just keep a look at pool if the hash decreases there too..sometimes I have constant numbers sometimes it drops a bit but at pool side it stays above 500 ...

I have on my GTX1080 @2100@5400 TDP of 41-43% and on my GTX1070 TDP of about 71% (one connector)
You can also try to open a 2nd instance and see if it increases in total

newbie
Activity: 48
Merit: 0
I have done the tests .

My results are :

for my gtx 1080 FE  : around 72 sols/s with gpu +150 and mem +500
for my gtx 1060 3 gb : around 58 sols/s with gpu +150 and mem +500

The pourcentage of use for each gpu is around 58 % . There is some headroom !

It seems that this not better ( but not worse ) that the miner that i currently use .

Moreover , the power consumption is slightly higher too .
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
yes it is with samsung ram , which if i want for test can reach +1000 , which is amazing!
This miner iof yours reached 480 and than started to go down 450? I don`t know why!
sr. member
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
Fighting mob law and inquisition in this forum
Looks like you have samsung ram and not micron on your GTX1070 and or have the patched bios already..i wait zotac is way behind schedule.
hero member
Activity: 676
Merit: 500
mem+650(4450) , core 2000
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1072
Use silentarmy it gives me 90 per card there i get 520 for all

same but not 520 only 510, what are your setting on msiafterburner?
Jump to: