CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 602.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: mirny on August 18, 2016, 10:22:41 PM

Quote from: antantti on August 18, 2016, 06:54:02 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:51:52 PM

based on this and the hash of the 980ti, it should do nearly 20MH or around that, but i would not be surprised if it can do more, like in lbry where the 980ti is a joke in comparison

How much is 980ti doing on lbry?

for about 200/220Mhs, depends on your settings

980ti should always be doing about 10% less then a 1070. If it isn't, that means something isn't working properly. 1070 will usually be double of a 970, otherwise, once again, something isn't working properly.

Lyra for instance, a 1070 doubles a 970s performance (give or take).

mirny

legendary

Activity: 1108

Merit: 1005

Quote from: antantti on August 18, 2016, 06:54:02 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:51:52 PM

based on this and the hash of the 980ti, it should do nearly 20MH or around that, but i would not be surprised if it can do more, like in lbry where the 980ti is a joke in comparison

How much is 980ti doing on lbry?

for about 200/220Mhs, depends on your settings

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:51:52 PM

based on this and the hash of the 980ti, it should do nearly 20MH or around that, but i would not be surprised if it can do more, like in lbry where the 980ti is a joke in comparison

How much is 980ti doing on lbry?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: pallas on August 18, 2016, 02:37:22 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:12:21 PM

Quote from: pallas on August 18, 2016, 02:02:36 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:00:51 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 01:49:11 PM

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

5MH on the 750ti and 15MH only on a 1070 does not sound right

15.5 @125W on 1070
17 @180W on 980Ti

what is the usage on a 1070?

99-100
But I think the power usage fluctuates too much, probably the power used is less than 125w.

based on this and the hash of the 980ti, it should do nearly 20MH or around that, but i would not be surprised if it can do more, like in lbry where the 980ti is a joke in comparison

Namsbreh

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 250

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 04:17:00 AM

Quote from: Namsbreh on August 17, 2016, 08:21:46 AM

Do you have any Pascal cards to test with?

I have the 1070.

Me too!

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:12:21 PM

Quote from: pallas on August 18, 2016, 02:02:36 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:00:51 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 01:49:11 PM

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

5MH on the 750ti and 15MH only on a 1070 does not sound right

15.5 @125W on 1070
17 @180W on 980Ti

what is the usage on a 1070?

99-100
But I think the power usage fluctuates too much, probably the power used is less than 125w.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: pallas on August 18, 2016, 02:02:36 PM

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:00:51 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 01:49:11 PM

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

5MH on the 750ti and 15MH only on a 1070 does not sound right

15.5 @125W on 1070
17 @180W on 980Ti

what is the usage on a 1070?

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: Amph on August 18, 2016, 02:00:51 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 01:49:11 PM

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

5MH on the 750ti and 15MH only on a 1070 does not sound right

15.5 @125W on 1070
17 @180W on 980Ti

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: sp_ on August 18, 2016, 01:49:11 PM

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

5MH on the 750ti and 15MH only on a 1070 does not sound right

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

If anybody is interested i have buildt a version of Pallas m7 miner for windows. (https://github.com/pallas1/ccminer-m7-branch/)

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/tag/1.2

Compiled with cuda 6.5. Unmodified sourcecode from Pallas github exept lower the intensity to 256*256*32 to fit 2GB cards. (-X 32)

It does around 5MHASH on the 750ti

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Namsbreh on August 17, 2016, 08:21:46 AM

Do you have any Pascal cards to test with?

I have the 1070.

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

SP you should consider selling your DCR miner to Claymore. Dual mining effectively killed off exclusively mining DCR.

Not sure how much he's would be willing to give you, but depending on how much better it is compared to his current miner it could be lucrative.

If Epsylon is still improving SIA he should consider selling his improvements to Claymore instead of just releasing them as well. He essentially makes money off of how fast his miner is, so it's something he might be interested in (which is why a miner fee is great).

Namsbreh

sr. member

Activity: 318

Merit: 250

Quote from: sp_ on August 17, 2016, 03:34:11 AM

Quote from: Namsbreh on August 15, 2016, 03:28:56 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 15, 2016, 01:13:25 PM

I am working on an update on the spreadcoin private miner #10. It's been 1.5 years since the last update. testing with cuda 8.0 now.

Great news, thank you.

The first tests shows that when my spreadcoin #9 is compiled with cuda 7.5 and cuda 8.0 I loose 4.5-7.25% (tested on maxwell 960M)

cuda 7.5: -7,25%
cuda 8.0: -4,47%

Do you have any Pascal cards to test with?

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: bathrobehero on August 17, 2016, 03:45:32 AM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bathrobehero on August 16, 2016, 03:48:56 PM

Quote from: ocminer on August 16, 2016, 03:15:33 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on August 16, 2016, 03:07:03 AM

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

It's not going to work that way. The reasources of the cards can't be shared equally simply by having two different instances. Instead, you get one algo completely dominating the other - if it even decides to work and not crash.

Quote from: klondike_bar_recovery on August 16, 2016, 10:12:57 AM

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

Exactly.

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

Weird only because we're used to P & D shitcoins. In general, you want more coins emitted as you get wider adoption, not a large concentration of coins in few entities.

True, but I think the increased emission rate should also come with increased demand for the coin (like utility) at roughly the same rate to try at least keeping the value of a single coin the same (which is not met). Otherwise people will not invest in it and you'll get a large concentration of coins in few entities just the same.

And there will be massive amounts of coins eventually getting into circulation without mining (https://explorer.lbry.io/richlist) further discouraging people from investing.

Aye... there are a lot of coins that literally could just have a flat distribution model... Meaning block reward is always the same and never changes. I guess it doesn't make it as 'exciting', but often times there is no point for putting out a fuck ton of coins at the beginning or end.

alrami

member

Activity: 92

Merit: 10

Quote from: antantti on August 16, 2016, 05:22:41 PM

If a [email protected] everyday makes you happy then this kindergarten is for you.

If you start to feel like that some candymans visits too often and you always end up with lollipop and strange feeling you maybe need to overclock.

yes, lollipops were tasty, but i'm trying to look at a steakes now
have no instruments and knowledge
will look for..

thank you for a kick. ;-)

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: bathrobehero on August 16, 2016, 03:48:56 PM

Quote from: ocminer on August 16, 2016, 03:15:33 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on August 16, 2016, 03:07:03 AM

New Claymore dual miner is out, not nearly as exciting as hoped. Not sure if Claymore is toning it down, but you essentially get very similar hashrates to AMD hardware that's quite a bit cheaper. Could be his DCR and SIA miners aren't very good. Too bad you can't combine SPs DCR miner with Claymores Ethereum miner... Partnership?

STEEM still needs a GPU miner as there isn't one available. A lot of volume though, definitely worth looking into.

You can just start the ETH miner - open a new windows and start SPR miner without a problem ?!

It's not going to work that way. The reasources of the cards can't be shared equally simply by having two different instances. Instead, you get one algo completely dominating the other - if it even decides to work and not crash.

Quote from: klondike_bar_recovery on August 16, 2016, 10:12:57 AM

LBC follows a weird distribution that increases linearly from 1->500 over 3 month period, then exponentially (logarithmically?) decreases over 20 years to nothing.

its about halfway through the growth phase (about 250coins/block right now, meaning about 3x more are produced daily today than they were a month ago), so expect the price to continue falling because miners *should* logically be dumping coins ASAP until the generation rate reaches 500 and stabilizes.

In theory, price should go down another 30-50% from where it is now, and will probably bottom out in about 2 months (when the reward has begun to slip to ~490/block). IMO owning the coin doesnt make much sense right now.

HOWEVER, mining it is still quite good. overall BTC/day/hashrate (if converting as you mine) has only fallen about 40% in the last 3 weeks despite the LBC/BTC falling 60% and difficulty roughly tripling.

Exactly.

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

Weird only because we're used to P & D shitcoins. In general, you want more coins emitted as you get wider adoption, not a large concentration of coins in few entities.

True, but I think the increased emission rate should also come with increased demand for the coin (like utility) at roughly the same rate to try at least keeping the value of a single coin the same (which is not met). Otherwise people will not invest in it and you'll get a large concentration of coins in few entities just the same.

And there will be massive amounts of coins eventually getting into circulation without mining (https://explorer.lbry.io/richlist) further discouraging people from investing.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: sp_ on August 17, 2016, 03:34:11 AM

Quote from: Namsbreh on August 15, 2016, 03:28:56 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 15, 2016, 01:13:25 PM

I am working on an update on the spreadcoin private miner #10. It's been 1.5 years since the last update. testing with cuda 8.0 now.

Great news, thank you.

The first tests shows that when my spreadcoin #9 is compiled with cuda 7.5 and cuda 8.0 I loose 4.5-7.25% (tested on maxwell 960M)

cuda 7.5: -7,25%
cuda 8.0: -4,47%

can you fix the unstable fb usage? if this is fixable... i find it strange because it happen only on spreadcoin, the wattage fluctuates from 120w to 200 some times, pretty annoying...

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Namsbreh on August 15, 2016, 03:28:56 PM

Quote from: sp_ on August 15, 2016, 01:13:25 PM

I am working on an update on the spreadcoin private miner #10. It's been 1.5 years since the last update. testing with cuda 8.0 now.

Great news, thank you.

The first tests shows that when my spreadcoin #9 is compiled with cuda 7.5 and cuda 8.0 I loose 4.5-7.25% (tested on maxwell 960M)

cuda 7.5: -7,25%
cuda 8.0: -4,47%

klondike_bar_recovery

member

Activity: 70

Merit: 10

Quote from: bathrobehero on August 16, 2016, 03:48:56 PM

Its distribution model is weird to say the least because it doesn't reward early investors.

should be called BAGHODLcoin - but its great for mining!

antantti

legendary

Activity: 1176

Merit: 1015

Quote from: alrami on August 16, 2016, 03:21:52 PM

Quote from: antantti on August 16, 2016, 12:56:25 PM

Order sell 941.41140000 ETHEUR @ limit 1.24889

Looks like as a profit fixing, but not large summ
What will be a lesson for us?

i'm will be thankfull for learning

If a [email protected] everyday makes you happy then this kindergarten is for you.

If you start to feel like that some candymans visits too often and you always end up with lollipop and strange feeling you maybe need to overclock.

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 602. (Read 2347641 times)