Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 620. (Read 2347641 times)

legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Hi everyone, is there a lbry nvidia miner app yet? thx

Latest tpruvot's, version 1.8.
I compiled it from git and it works. Not sure there are binaries out there, though.
Thx pallas  Smiley what would the bat file look like for a 750ti? thx

ADDED TO MY MINERCONTROL.CONF--

I compiled it under Lunux/CUDA 7.5 and get about 50MH/s per 750ti.  The launch line is "ccminer -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://pooladdress:port -u user -p password".  I find that you can use high intensity settings "-i 23.7", but if you go too high, performance declines.  A setting of "-i 23.9" worked without crashing, but gave lower hash rates.

I had to start it manually with MinerControl, because Zpool has not found a block yet.  Zpool might not find a block, only 19 miners last time I looked, about 3.5GH/s pool total hash rate.       --scryptr
Thx scryptr  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
Hi everyone, is there a lbry nvidia miner app yet? thx

Latest tpruvot's, version 1.8.
I compiled it from git and it works. Not sure there are binaries out there, though.
Thx pallas  Smiley what would the bat file look like for a 750ti? thx

ADDED TO MY MINERCONTROL.CONF--

I compiled it under Lunux/CUDA 7.5 and get about 50MH/s per 750ti.  The launch line is "ccminer -a lbry -o stratum+tcp://pooladdress:port -u user -p password".  I find that you can use high intensity settings "-i 23.7", but if you go too high, performance declines.  A setting of "-i 23.9" worked without crashing, but gave lower hash rates.

I had to start it manually with MinerControl, because Zpool has not found a block yet.  That means it is very low in the price rating, and won't be auto-selected.  Zpool might not find a block, only 19 miners last time I looked, about 3.5GH/s pool total hash rate.       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Hi everyone, is there a lbry nvidia miner app yet? thx

Latest tpruvot's, version 1.8.
I compiled it from git and it works. Not sure there are binaries out there, though.
Thx pallas  Smiley what would the bat file look like for a 750ti? thx
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))

is that with windows?

Yes, win7. Palit SuperJetstream, powerlimit 114%, core +85, mem -500.
Need more power in bios ((

Interested on how you're getting these numbers as well. Unless it's because of W7. I'm getting 250 with very similar clocks on W8 x64.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
i guess you are not lucky, i made no changes there Wink

GPU #1: SM 3.5 MSI GT 720 @ 797 MHz (MEM 2505)


and works Wink
hero member
Activity: 979
Merit: 510
When compiling for a Ti 780(compute 3.5) on Ubuntu 14 using Cuda 7.5, I get:
ptxas /tmp/tmpxft_00001257_00000000-6_cuda_x11_echo.compute_35.ptx, line 9007; error   : Instruction 'lop3' requires .target sm_50 or higher
during the make phase.
Cloned from git, edited Makefile.am, ran ./build
 
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
i switched to your pool, i want to try how it go there, 24 hours test
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
higher the pool diff is, higher the variance will be... its normal Wink less shares = more "holes" in estimations

but a higher pool diff is better to find blocks also
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
It seems that original sgminer (free) version by Wolf is more pool friendly in terms of hashrate equality between miner and pool. New tpruvot miner shows big numbers but poolside all is not so good.

My poolside numbers look fine... There is variance, but often times there is. It goes up and down from what it shows. If it was all just down there would be a problem.
sr. member
Activity: 330
Merit: 252
It seems that original sgminer (free) version by Wolf is more pool friendly in terms of hashrate equality between miner and pool. New tpruvot miner shows big numbers but poolside all is not so good.

...just use yiimp.ccminer.org and all should be fine.
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
It seems that original sgminer (free) version by Wolf is more pool friendly in terms of hashrate equality between miner and pool. New tpruvot miner shows big numbers but poolside all is not so good.

tha may be the reason why you get less than the estimate shown on the pool, up to 15% less
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
It seems that original sgminer (free) version by Wolf is more pool friendly in terms of hashrate equality between miner and pool. New tpruvot miner shows big numbers but poolside all is not so good.
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
2 Cooldemos

I'm going to put a keylogger in it and post it later ))))))))))
Wink Wink  Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
2 Cooldemos

I'm going to put a keylogger in it and post it later ))))))))))

upd. crypto mining blog is already do it for me ))
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
This Palit is doing 2080-2100 clock ))
My zotac's can do the same,Default tdp 220w(dual 8 pin  Grin)  2000core clok (according to gpuz) 225mh/s i think it's about kernel.100mhz can'tbe enough for affect 50+mh/s.Waiting for offiacial or sp's optimised miner Smiley))

I'm telling the numbers that miner shows. The pool.mn shows high variance in hashrate so I don't no if the miner shown hashrate is ok. I just downloaded sources from tpruvot git and compiled in release 32 bit mode with vs2013 and cuda 7.5

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-8VA_FurGHNY/V4-QsMZTLaI/AAAAAAAABH8/9U8hJq8ilZM2StAu7sYUsvmemvozX40YQCCo/s800/%25D0%2591%25D0%25B5%25D0%25B7%25D1%258B%25D0%25BC%25D1%258F%25D0%25BD%25D0%25BD%25D1%258B%25D0%25B9.png
Mate why don't you post the Miner over here ?! Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
This Palit is doing 2080-2100 clock ))
My zotac's can do the same,Default tdp 220w(dual 8 pin  Grin)  2000core clok (according to gpuz) 225mh/s i think it's about kernel.100mhz can'tbe enough for affect 50+mh/s.Waiting for offiacial or sp's optimised miner Smiley))

yes you have the old release the new one is 20-25% faster, OC only give you 10% at most, never that much
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
This Palit is doing 2080-2100 clock ))
My zotac's can do the same,Default tdp 220w(dual 8 pin  Grin)  2000core clok (according to gpuz) 225mh/s i think it's about kernel.100mhz can'tbe enough for affect 50+mh/s.Waiting for offiacial or sp's optimised miner Smiley))

I'm telling the numbers that miner shows. The pool.mn shows high variance in hashrate so I don't no if the miner shown hashrate is ok. I just downloaded sources from tpruvot git and compiled in release 32 bit mode with vs2013 and cuda 7.5

sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
This Palit is doing 2080-2100 clock ))
My zotac's can do the same,Default tdp 220w(dual 8 pin  Grin)  2000core clok (according to gpuz) 225mh/s i think it's about kernel.100mhz can'tbe enough for affect 50+mh/s.Waiting for offiacial or sp's optimised miner Smiley))
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
This Palit is doing 2080-2100 clock ))
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Well, it works 272mh/s on poor palit gtx1070 )) Will see the hashrate on the pool side ))
Strange 225 with +75 from my side.
Jump to: