Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 624. (Read 2347641 times)

Sure, but often times you have to completely reprogram the thing from the ground up. They're both in a different class of products from GPUs.

FPGAs are in a completely different class... You could lump ASICs into that comparison too. They also can mine multiple algos... They just have to be built from the ground up each and every time. To that extent, so do miners for GPUs (depending on how different the algo is from other ones already made), but the time requirement is quite a bit different.

well not fair to compare a gpu with fpga, fpga can do well one thing at time, then you need to reprogram it, gpu can do multiple things

it will consume more energy because of that, if gpu were specialized only on mining, they would be just asic, so yes it's not all about nm productive process

As good as it's been doing for the last six months? Kinda why I've been pushing for Dual mining, because there is a diminishing return for the amount of work people are putting into things and getting relatively nothing out of it (compared to a dual miner). Not currently mining Eth though.

Which got you all of 1-2% more then Genoil's miner? ~_~

I remember when Carmack chased the dream of getting every last ounce of performance out of Xbox 360s and PS3s with Rage. Pretty much was a waste of time when there is something better available.

again it's easy to do 240MH on fury when they consume 270w, not impressed

currently you can do 220 with a 1070 at half the wattage, if someone can check the utilizzation on lbry, if it is not 99% then there are probably some optimizations to do, otherwise not so much

i would like to see wolfo working on nivida some times, to see what he can really pull off, or if this is because you can do more with amd than nvidia...something is telling me that it is the latter...

Aye, and your hashrate fluctuates, so unless you know your absolute average on the pool, it's going to change a lot on top of hourly earnings fluctuating for the last 24 hours (bad hours and good hours).

Algo switching doesn't work nearly as well as you think it will due to it not being able to calculate your influence on a coins difficulty. That would have to be something really advanced and not something like minercontrol. Which is why you see some people dumping their hashrate and immediately crashing a coin (and of course getting almost no rewards for doing so). Depending on how fast the coin adjusts to hashrate. Some coins have really good difficulty adjustments, while others don't. Also something stupid like minercontrol doesn't take into account. Difficulty increases don't need to be linear.

I'm sure there is a big miner operation that actually has someone with expertise in coin development who takes all of this into account. Ideal solution really has nothing to do with hoping from coin to coin, but rather mining all relevant coins with just enough hashrate to profit from a smaller coin. Spreading the hash instead of bombing coins, but once again something that takes expertise and time to program.


Wolf0s miner finally caught up with Epsolyn's. Hope Epsolyn is still improving his.


160 on a 290x
240 on a Fury

Pools usually use difficulty of the last 24 hours to estimate your earnings. The estimation today should in theory be consistent with how much you earn yesterday.

As to today's lbc earnings, with 800 Mh/s you should expect 28 usd.

That estimation is far from telling the whole story tho... I'm recently doing algorithm switching. There are hidden gems like UFO coin that sometimes earns you a $ in minutes but nothing for the rest of the day. It whacks coins with difficulty algorithms that suck are too sensitive.

Weird, I'm earning about on par on Suprnova with yiimp. -3%

The 'calculator', if you're referring to how much it says you're going to earn in the pool tab is estimated based on current pool income and network difficulty. Some coins fluctuate a LOT. Each pool will give you a different estimate.

I was mining on MNpool and one of the days I caught it, I earned about 50% of what I should, even though the pool wasn't having bad luck. There is a earning tab you can check your daily earnings and hourly earnings on.

Earnings tab is ACTUAL where pool tab is ESTIMATE.

If a 980 can really reach 190, it's not with a general MINER, but a testing one from the main dev.

With the current binaries, 150 with an high OC it's doable. 220 with a 1070oc it's perfectly in line.

probably the 1070 is not fully optimized, if a 980 cna do 190MH, a 1070 should be above 200MH

the profit calculators between suprnova and pool.mn are identical, what I cannot understand it's the inhability to reach those value on a 20% lower average. The loss it's too significant to consider a simple hashrate variation.

A 1080 should gain, right now, in 24h 16 coins, for a total of 0.02BTC, but you can obtain in the end just a bit more than the half.

Weird behaviour.

ps: no, i'm not talking about accepted share variations, pool efficiency on suprnova it's more than 95%. If we consider the net hashrate and the difficulty it makes no sense.

djm, I've sent you a pm about it.

Thanks

..shame , I only reach 150 MH/s with mine GTX980

don't remember but I think the 980 is only 180W (running at 120% tdp)... that makes it mostly below 200W

980 no ti

that was my suspect as well supernova estimate seems wrong or not on par with the block features of adding 1 coin on the reward for each additional 100 blocks


where is the open source miner?


yeah but consumption is prolly very bad in that case, not below 200w for sure

gtx 1070 is doing 0.007-0.01 btc/day with public available open-sourced miner on public pool. What is the reason to mess with libry?

$7.3 per day on the old Horse. Not bad.

GTX 980 or 980ti gains around 190MH/s ?