CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 719.

rednoW

legendary

Activity: 1510

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sp_ on March 27, 2016, 03:47:34 PM

This private miner will earn 0,00142592BTC / day @32MHASH quark. (zpool.ca) ($6.13)
Genoils etherum miner will give you ($4.71) of 24 hours of mining. on the same card.

Wrong math, 0.001426 btc is only 60 cents )))
sell your 980ti buy 3 dirty cheap sapphire 290x for earned money and you will get $20 per day LOL

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

I am working on the sp-mod ultimate. Most of the kernals merged into one. Since #6 will include decred,vcach,blake2s the price will be more than 0.1 BTC.

I have added some more quark hash:

This private miner will earn 0,00142592BTC / day @32MHASH quark. (zpool.ca) ($6.13)
Genoils etherum miner will give you ($4.71) of 24 hours of mining. on the same card.

Donators will get discounts on #6 when it's ready.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bathrobehero on March 26, 2016, 05:35:21 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 26, 2016, 03:20:18 AM

That's a known fix for 'unknown work'. Currently you can't tweak those settings in ccminer except for scan time, which means on occasion the miner will just shit a fuck ton of unknown works and the number of accepted submits drops to about 50%. It really hurts your efficiency pool side.

Yes, and when it does it, it will continue to do so for a long time. Restarting the miner or if I remember correctly when the pool pushes a difficulty change also sovles the issue but I'm not 100% on that one.

In 1.5.78 I submit stale shares as default. In 1.7.5 they are not submitted. Didn't make a switch though.

Here is the changeset:

https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/commit/6a1e8cda54df25dc6e484b20c7879aa87cf95841

If anybody wants to make a fix with a switch, add a pull request and I will merge it. (flipclip, pallas?`)

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: fenomenhaa on March 26, 2016, 04:52:05 AM

Maybe you can make a discount for donators of other modules. Forex. for every module donatıors you can make 0.1btc discount.

)

Good idea.

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 26, 2016, 03:20:18 AM

That's a known fix for 'unknown work'. Currently you can't tweak those settings in ccminer except for scan time, which means on occasion the miner will just shit a fuck ton of unknown works and the number of accepted submits drops to about 50%. It really hurts your efficiency pool side.

Yes, and when it does it, it will continue to do so for a long time. Restarting the miner or if I remember correctly when the pool pushes a difficulty change also sovles the issue but I'm not 100% on that one.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 26, 2016, 03:20:18 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 26, 2016, 02:14:55 AM

But the price will be more than 0.1 BTC. Not fair for the people who have already bough the other modules.

Is the speed the same between vnl+dcr compared to just dcr in #7?

Same speed. But I might add the blake2s kernal(+7%) for free for the Vcash+vanilla donatores.

fenomenhaa

sr. member

Activity: 248

Merit: 250

Quote from: sp_ on March 26, 2016, 02:14:55 AM

But the price will be more than 0.1 BTC. Not fair for the people who have already bough the other modules.

Maybe you can make a discount for donators of other modules. Forex. for every module donatıors you can make 0.1btc discount.

)

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: sp_ on March 26, 2016, 02:14:55 AM

But the price will be more than 0.1 BTC. Not fair for the people who have already bough the other modules.

Is the speed the same between vnl+dcr compared to just dcr in #7?

Also

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 24, 2016, 03:09:15 PM

Not sure what the 'unknown work' submit error is, I've gotten it a few times though over the months trying to use decred. It'll usually work fine and then crap out a bunch of those all in a row.

Quote from: ocminer

This is a confirmed bug in cgminer on windows. It affects all pools. This flags seem to help:

--no-submit-stale --scan-time 2 --queue 0

Unknown-work means you are sending work back to the pool that was never requested - thats why it gets rejected, on windows cgminer seems to wrong calculation of the hash sometimes which results in this behavior.

It will probably get fixed in one of the future releases, or simply try the flags above.

https://forum.decred.org/threads/unknown-work-rejected-shares-pool-mining.511/

Please fix this.

That's a known fix for 'unknown work'. Currently you can't tweak those settings in ccminer except for scan time, which means on occasion the miner will just shit a fuck ton of unknown works and the number of accepted submits drops to about 50%. It really hurts your efficiency pool side.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

But the price will be more than 0.1 BTC. Not fair for the people who have already bough the other modules.

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 26, 2016, 01:20:00 AM

Curiously is the Decred #7 you sent to .1 subs the same as vanilla+decred you sent out before? If not, what's the difference in speed?

DELUXE EDITION--

When you release the number one top miner, SP_PRO v 2.0, please let us all know. I will donate.

The hash rates seem real. Just mark the release and I'll go for it. --scryptr

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Curiously is the Decred #7 you sent to .1 subs the same as vanilla+decred you sent out before? If not, what's the difference in speed?

crysx

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 260

--- ChainWorks Industries ---

Quote from: sp_ on March 25, 2016, 03:36:26 PM

Quote from: sp_ on March 25, 2016, 01:30:43 PM

I just did a comparison between my buyable private miner (0.1BTC) and the latest 1.7.5 release.
I have written 0-10% faster, but I should have written 17-74% faster

Sp-Mod #5 default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 16.10 (+16.6%)
x11: 12.85 (+18%)
x13: 10.27 (+19.97)
x15: 8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)

Current profit with my modded kernal on nicehash.com:(one single gtx 980ti, 24 hours mining)

neoscrypt:    0,00971250BTC ($4,0792500)
quark:   0,00907910BTC ($3,8132220)
x15:       0,00819512BTC ($3,4419504)
x13:       0,00796027BTC ($3,3433134)
x11:       0,00718058BTC ($3,0158436)
lyra2v2:   0,00663964BTC ($2,7886488)
nist5:     0,00161184BTC ($0,6769728)

does this mean you will cut out most of the other algos that are already contained in ccminer-tpruvot175 and only provide the above kernels? ...

or still have the other algos - but have the above modded - but still be able to mine the other algos ( non-modded ) ? ...

#crysx

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: sp_ on March 25, 2016, 01:30:43 PM

I just did a comparison between my buyable private miner (0.1BTC) and the latest 1.7.5 release.
I have written 0-10% faster, but I should have written 17-74% faster

Sp-Mod #5 default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 16.10 (+16.6%)
x11: 12.85 (+18%)
x13: 10.27 (+19.97)
x15: 8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)

Current profit with my modded kernal on nicehash.com:(one single gtx 980ti, 24 hours mining)

neoscrypt:    0,00971250BTC ($4,0792500)
quark:   0,00907910BTC ($3,8132220)
x15:       0,00819512BTC ($3,4419504)
x13:       0,00796027BTC ($3,3433134)
x11:       0,00718058BTC ($3,0158436)
lyra2v2:   0,00663964BTC ($2,7886488)
nist5:     0,00161184BTC ($0,6769728)

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: sp_ on March 25, 2016, 01:55:43 PM

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 25, 2016, 01:20:54 PM

Curiously SP, why don't you try a miner fee in addition to a paid fee? As in you release a private miner for .1BTC or 2% miner fee. People who really want it will pay .1 and people who don't have the money will mine on 2%. It's safe to assume there is no exclusivity here as we aren't paying $500 for a miner, so people who really want it will buy it anyway as .1 is affordable.

I think I will do this, and include all the algos in one miner.

Something worth trying to see how much it makes you and whether or not people try to remove the fee. You always seem to be improving things, so you can just go back to a .1BTC private miner if it turns out horrible and improve it so it obsoletes the miner fee version.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 25, 2016, 01:20:54 PM

Curiously SP, why don't you try a miner fee in addition to a paid fee? As in you release a private miner for .1BTC or 2% miner fee. People who really want it will pay .1 and people who don't have the money will mine on 2%. It's safe to assume there is no exclusivity here as we aren't paying $500 for a miner, so people who really want it will buy it anyway as .1 is affordable.

I think I will do this, and include all the algos in one miner.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

I just did a comparison between my buyable private miner (0.1BTC) and the latest 1.7.5 release.
I have written 0-10% faster, but I should have written 17-74% faster

Sp-Mod #5 default intensities hashrates in MHASH/s. (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 43.80 (+17%)
quark: 27.85 (+61,91%)
lyra2v2 16.10 (+16.6%)
x11: 12.85 (+18%)
x13: 10.27 (+19.97)
x15: 8.83 (+18.52 )
neoscrypt: 0.99 (+73.68%)

1.7.5: (32bit windows build cuda 7.5) default intensities in MHASH/s (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 37.45
quark: 17.20
lyra2v2: 13.81
x11: 10.88
x13: 8.56
x15: 7.45
neoscrypt: 0.57

1.7.5: (32bit windows build cuda 6.5) (980ti 1290 coreclock/1650 memclock)

nist5: 38.93
quark: 17.5
lyra2v2: 13.18
x11: 10.95
x13: 8.88
x15: 7.7
neoscrypt: 0.71

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: pallas on March 25, 2016, 09:25:29 AM

Quote from: scryptr on March 25, 2016, 09:21:35 AM

ONE MINER--

I think you should combine your efforts into ONE (1) deluxe miner. I suspect that it would sell much better. Really, much better sales. --scryptr

I agree.

I disagree... Lets say his deluxe miner includes all five of his private miners he sells for .1BTC a piece. Do you want to pay .5BTC for his deluxe miner or even .4BTC? I believe you guys are assuming he'll cut you a deal for the whole package, when it might not be the case.

Current smaller miners have much more options for people mining different coins, although bundling means he'll sell code no one is really interested in, like Vanilla and Cryptonote...

That being said, it definitely could be a bundle if there was a miner fee... As you aren't purchasing single parts of the whole system to cut down on cost and increase ROI... Once again, miner fee is the best system.

Curiously SP, why don't you try a miner fee in addition to a paid fee? As in you release a private miner for .1BTC or 2% miner fee. People who really want it will pay .1 and people who don't have the money will mine on 2%. It's safe to assume there is no exclusivity here as we aren't paying $500 for a miner, so people who really want it will buy it anyway as .1 is affordable.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Thanks scryptr. Decred #7 is very profitable at the moment.

scryptr

legendary

Activity: 1797

Merit: 1028

SP_PRO 2.0 --

Has a nice ring to it. I will set aside 0.1 BTC for another donation. Happy Easter! --scryptr

survaisija

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Quote from: sp_ on March 25, 2016, 10:09:59 AM

Quote from: pallas on March 25, 2016, 09:25:29 AM

Quote from: scryptr on March 25, 2016, 09:21:35 AM

ONE MINER--
I think you should combine your efforts into ONE (1) deluxe miner. I suspect that it would sell much better. Really, much better sales. --scryptr

I agree.

A refork has been planned for a long time.. The latest mod's (decred,vcash @ blake2s) are all based on the latest 1.7.4/1.7.5 fork) I could merge my work in the 1.5.78 private to the latest.

What do you think about a sp-mod 1.7.5 with increases in the following algos:

pentablake(+100%)
decred (+20%)
vcash(+13%)
lyra2v2(+10%)
blake2s(+7%)
quark(+7%)
x11(+3%)
x13(+3%)
x14(+3%)
x15(+3%)
x17(+3%)
nist5(+5%)

All in one miner.

sounds nice

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 719. (Read 2347641 times)