Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 733. (Read 2347659 times)

newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
I got 980 TI and with optimized decred SP version #4 i get about ~15% more hashrate, not bad.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
i think it cost too much, 0.1 for each update is expensive, for newbie

anyway how much the optimized cryptonigh is doing?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Vanilla coin sp-mod #1 is now available for a 0.2BTC donation It includes the decred sp-mod #4. The decred donators will get a discount of 0.1BTC. There wil be no more updates on the Decred algo. You need to upgrade to the Decred+Vanilla miner to recieve decred #5.
Vanillacoin 8.5% faster:


Nobody wants my optimized Vanillacoin kernal? You make around 40 VNL / Day on a single 980ti. (4,5GHASH)

0.012BTC = 5$

When everybody mine decred, the difficulty is going up and the profit is declining.  Then you need options. A faster vanilla kernal is a must for the proffesional miners.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
how much the cryptonight best version is doing with a 970?
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I rewrote blake-512 and got a 0.5% increase in the quark algo & x11/x13/x15/nist5. Will be included in the next nicehashminer optimized.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Also, anyone use Mining Rig Rentals for Ethereum? I've tried to get it working a few times, but Stratum is only compatible with a couple miners and not eth-proxy. Getwork seems to always give me a saw tooth pattern as there seems to be connectivity issues of some kind between the MMR and pools.




I'll check out 64bit decred later today. I swear it works fine before, but now getting the weird hashrate decrease I thought was fixed.
I get patterns like that when the difficulty ajustments from the source are to high bensam1231.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Also, anyone use Mining Rig Rentals for Ethereum? I've tried to get it working a few times, but Stratum is only compatible with a couple miners and not eth-proxy. Getwork seems to always give me a saw tooth pattern as there seems to be connectivity issues of some kind between the MMR and pools.




I'll check out 64bit decred later today. I swear it works fine before, but now getting the weird hashrate decrease I thought was fixed.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
yiimp.ccminer.org is a good pool. 6.25% of the network now. The 5% fee is going to the developer of the decred stratum support.
Good.. 5% to developer thx  sp


Did you get the balance I owned you?
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Wonder if I need to add anything to my bat file like   -s 10 or difficulty setting?

Just got up to 5.1 gh/s now dropping.

Mine at yiimp.ccminer.org or zpool.ca
There's no profit there sp. Undecided

EDIT: did you compile DECRED r 4 in 86x  or 64x  ?

I was wrong about yiimp pool with DECRED ... it's giving me 2x as many coins as suprnova. Yiimp is doing great sp  Smiley

Small pools(meant about hashrate) sometimes gives much more profit it depends on luck.I was mining on pool.mn( so far so good)didin%t tireed yiimp yet, Yiimp %5 fee is too much for me.Here calculator.you can check
http://decred-calc.cryptohub.info/

Realesa #4 64 bit not better then x86 #4 built from my side.
Thx fenomenhaa...... that calculator shows I should be getting 14 a day I already have 10 at yiimp in 12 hours Grin
Yes I don't know why 5% charge on DECRED .. doesn't make sense.
And I'm back to using 86x build with --cpu-priority 3. But not getting the hashrates others are. But a definite improvement as I posted earlier.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
yiimp.ccminer.org is a good pool. 6.25% of the network now. The 5% fee is going to the developer of the decred stratum support.
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Wonder if I need to add anything to my bat file like   -s 10 or difficulty setting?

Just got up to 5.1 gh/s now dropping.

Mine at yiimp.ccminer.org or zpool.ca
There's no profit there sp. Undecided

EDIT: did you compile DECRED r 4 in 86x  or 64x  ?

I was wrong about yiimp pool with DECRED ... it's giving me 2x as many coins as suprnova. Yiimp is doing great sp  Smiley

Small pools(meant about hashrate) sometimes gives much more profit it depends on luck.I was mining on pool.mn( so far so good)didin%t tireed yiimp yet, Yiimp %5 fee is too much for me.Here calculator.you can check
http://decred-calc.cryptohub.info/

Realesa #4 64 bit not better then x86 #4 built from my side.
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Wonder if I need to add anything to my bat file like   -s 10 or difficulty setting?

Just got up to 5.1 gh/s now dropping.

Mine at yiimp.ccminer.org or zpool.ca
There's no profit there sp. Undecided

EDIT: did you compile DECRED r 4 in 86x  or 64x  ?

I was wrong about yiimp pool with DECRED ... it's giving me 2x as many coins as suprnova. Yiimp is doing great sp  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
5x750ti@1280 core
r#3 = 2856mh/s
r#4 = 3066mh/s
Thank You!

613.2MHASH per 750ti @ 1280mhz core. Not bad
Net amount: -0.08252800 BTC
Transaction ID: 6a1861caedee9cade4c97a8431b376c5f6ce377b961633d5c90e835aa4ea0a11-000

For DECRED release #4

SP    Will send the rest in about 3 hrs  ok  Wink ..you know I'm good for it. Smiley

Thx

SP here is is the balance ....... thx


Net amount: -0.01763139 BTC
Transaction ID: 21bee6a4b8c7c570235262d52fa6a1f325ac1a0b4bd6bec2c6c95af64b2b5e45-000
sr. member
Activity: 248
Merit: 250
Anyone else having issues with decred not showing correct speeds on pool with #3 and #4?

Coinmine, suprnova, and mnpool all have the same problem. Missing about 25% of my speed, 100% accepts.
I had same problem in suprnova but pool.mn shows real hash speed with #3 and #4
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
Anyone else having issues with decred not showing correct speeds on pool with #3 and #4?

Coinmine, suprnova, and mnpool all have the same problem. Missing about 25% of my speed, 100% accepts.

TPRUVOT'S STRATUM RELEASE--

Tpruvot's stratum-enabled CCminer release v1.7.4 behaves this way and stopped working on the SuprNova stratum port (2252) today.  It began to report very low hash rates poolside, and now can no longer connect on the dedicated stratum port.

However, I get good results on the non-stratum ports, with proper stats poolside.

Sorry, haven't been able to try sp_ 's version, I think he forgot to send it my way.       --scryptr
full member
Activity: 133
Merit: 102
I test #4 version on my gtx970 card
MSI 970 - 1560Mh
Gigabyte 970 - 1620Mh
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer

timeout /t 30
ccminer.exe -a decred -o mine1.coinmine.pl:1999 -u  -p x
pause

For coinmine. I've also tried all the difficulties and also stratum. Usually test it for about 15 minutes or so.

I haven't tried the 64bit version yet, I assume it wouldn't make much of a difference.

please try the 64bit CPU version. and add -q to the command line. If your processor is weak (Celeron) and you have 6 cards in the rig, the 64bit bit build is helping the hashrate.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Did you try the stratum? Did you get the 64bit version?

ports:
 Diff 1: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9110
 Diff 4: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111
 Diff 8: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9112
 Diff 64: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9115

ccminer Stratum enabled Port: stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 Blog-Article


timeout /t 30
ccminer.exe -a decred -o mine1.coinmine.pl:1999 -u  -p x
pause

For coinmine. I've also tried all the difficulties and also stratum. Usually test it for about 15 minutes or so.

I haven't tried the 64bit version yet, I assume it wouldn't make much of a difference.
iom
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
Poolmn show my correct speed with #3 and #4.

Show us your bat file.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Did you try the stratum? Did you get the 64bit version?

ports:
 Diff 1: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9110
 Diff 4: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9111
 Diff 8: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9112
 Diff 64: http://dcr.suprnova.cc:9115

ccminer Stratum enabled Port: stratum+tcp://dcr.suprnova.cc:2252 Blog-Article
Jump to: