CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 728.

Epsylon3

legendary

Activity: 1484

Merit: 1082

ccminer/cpuminer developer

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 05:01:41 PM

Clever move from tpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5

I'm sorry but its not true, i dont have the code of suprnova and the problem is inside...

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Nvidia users normally mine quark or lyra2v2, because the kernals are more optimized than x11. What are you getting in the quark and lyra2v2 algos on the r270?

zTheWolfz

full member

Activity: 231

Merit: 150

r270 are getting 7mh per card with 5.1.0 version for me r270x a little more mining x11.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Clever move from tvpruvot. He release a opensource decred miner that will only get the correct hashrate on his own pool(with a 5% fee) or solomining. Zpool.ca read my thread and reduced the default diff to 0.5 from 0.75. With a diff of 0.5 you only get payed for 1/2 the hash that you make.. wolf0 writes thats how the pools work. I agree and will fix the broken hash in my private decred miner #5

bathrobehero

legendary

Activity: 2002

Merit: 1051

ICO? Not even once.

Quote from: sp_ on March 19, 2016, 03:40:38 PM

I can teach you why the kernal is displaying low numbers for low difficulty shares. (and for single cards with a low hashrate)

Take a look at at
https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/blob/windows/Algo256/decred.cu

and line 259

      if (h[7] == 0 && cuda_swab32(h[6]) <= highTarget) {

We don't care about the 4 first bytes of the hash and assume they are 0. This is to spead up the search.


Here is a found decred block:(hash)

0000000000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c

0000000 000000d1ec551b6e0b734dbfa31e95059aa84e50f7db2ab244499c87c

but when a pool asks for a low difficulty share
f.eks find a number that is less than this:
00000ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffffffffffffffff
We are not submitting the shares that have anything else than 00000000 in the first 32 bits of the hash (why should we when we know that the solution doesn't give a block)

If I mod the kernal to search the top 32bits only (h[7]) <= Target the mining software will work exellent at low difficulty, but not so good on higher diff.. We are searching for blocks with 14 leading zero's So I believe the current kernal is good, and the pools are fucked..

Because likely every other miner does that and so we're earning that much less because of them.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Since I have an new donator for cryoptonight I will release #2 with some fixes and more hash

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

I have located the problem with the decred miner on 5-6 card celeron rigs. I will release a fix in version 5. Same fix in the vanilla mod.

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

I have 6 private miners for the people who donate (donators will get updates).

1. 0.1BTC: Pentablake +100-120% (3 releases)
2. 0.1BTC: Cryptonight +10% (one release)
3. 0.1BTC: Spreadcoin +10-20% (with full sourcecode / linux compatible) (9 releases)
4. 0.1BTC: All nicehash algos optimized. 0-10% (5 releases) (x11,x13,x15,nist5,quark,lyra2v2,neoscrypt)
5. 0.1BTC: decred +18-25% (4 releases)
6. 0.2BTC: Vanillacoin (one release) (+11% includes the decred(+18-25%) (0.1 btc discount for the decred buyers)

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: alevlaslo on March 20, 2016, 02:45:53 PM

Quote from: Eliovp on March 20, 2016, 02:31:14 PM

Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.

.bat please
Nicehash 5.3.0 activated, not 5.1.0

The fastest kernals are up to 1000% faster than the opensource. The nicehash miner contains compiled binaries that sometimes only work on windows

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: bensam1231 on March 20, 2016, 12:57:57 PM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 10:26:13 AM

Quote from: Vaccomondus on March 20, 2016, 08:41:44 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

your post is confusing, 5.4 a day with a 980ti mean 2.7 with a 970, which is not that good comapred to 5-6 with etheruem an other algo and btw on what coin, dash?

I wrote profitable. Not the most protitable. The 980ti and the 970 make the same mining etherum. $5-6 only 22Mhash

What are you getting on your private miner for x11 on a 970?

I think its around 8.5mhash@1366 core. I just did another + 0.5% will be released in version 6 to the donators. (Unreleased)

AzzAz

legendary

Activity: 1030

Merit: 1006

980Ti = US$ 6 / day @ nicehash...
@ alevlaslo: nicehash miner, no .bat

alevlaslo

hero member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 593

Quote from: Eliovp on March 20, 2016, 02:31:14 PM

Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.

.bat please

Nicehash 5.3.0 activated, not 5.1.0

ivcelmik

sr. member

Activity: 519

Merit: 250

HI guys can someone help me with a version of ccminer that work on x11 with cuda 7.5 thx in advance

Eliovp

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1294

Huh?

Quote from: alevlaslo on March 20, 2016, 02:23:43 PM

Quote from: sp_ on January 20, 2016, 02:27:38 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 19, 2016, 06:45:30 PM

AMD dropped the price of the Nano to $500 a few weeks ago.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20600566293

Let's do a profit calculation..

The nano can do 20MHASH of x11

0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY

500$ = 1,32BTC

1.32/0.003 = 440

It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming..

How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh

Nicehash release. 5.1.0 version.

alevlaslo

hero member

Activity: 1988

Merit: 593

Quote from: sp_ on January 20, 2016, 02:27:38 AM

Quote from: bensam1231 on January 19, 2016, 06:45:30 PM

AMD dropped the price of the Nano to $500 a few weeks ago.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20600566293

Let's do a profit calculation..

The nano can do 20MHASH of x11

0.020GHASH * 0.15 (Nicehash payment for 1 GHASH) = 0,003 BTC /DAY

500$ = 1,32BTC

1.32/0.003 = 440

It will take the Nano 440 days TO ROI with FREE POWER. And in these 440 days we have pascal and the 14NM chips comming..

How can i get 20 mh on Nano?? I have only 7 mh

bensam1231

legendary

Activity: 1764

Merit: 1024

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 10:26:13 AM

Quote from: Vaccomondus on March 20, 2016, 08:41:44 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

your post is confusing, 5.4 a day with a 980ti mean 2.7 with a 970, which is not that good comapred to 5-6 with etheruem an other algo and btw on what coin, dash?

I wrote profitable. Not the most protitable. The 980ti and the 970 make the same mining etherum. $5-6 only 22Mhash

What are you getting on your private miner for x11 on a 970?

pallas

legendary

Activity: 2716

Merit: 1094

Black Belt Developer

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: rednoW on March 20, 2016, 11:15:09 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

poor nvidia.
290x is doing 16mhs on stock clocks downvolted to 1.06v. Only 250w.
Easy to get kachur miner from nicehash package ))

Works well on Linux too with some slight edits to the host miner. I pulled my BMW and merged it via GCN assembly - was faster. Guess most of his work went into SIMD.

It's nice to know there is still room for improvement on those x algos.
I won't ask you the binaries for sure, but something to help make the public ones work on linux would be much appreciated ;-)

rednoW

legendary

Activity: 1510

Merit: 1003

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

poor nvidia.
290x is doing 16mhs on stock clocks downvolted to 1.06v. Only 250w.
Easy to get kachur miner from nicehash package ))

Vaccomondus

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 10:26:13 AM

Quote from: Vaccomondus on March 20, 2016, 08:41:44 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

your post is confusing, 5.4 a day with a 980ti mean 2.7 with a 970, which is not that good comapred to 5-6 with etheruem an other algo and btw on what coin, dash?

I wrote profitable. Not the most protitable. The 980ti and the 970 make the same mining etherum. $5-6 only 22Mhash

what coin x11?

sp_

legendary

Activity: 2954

Merit: 1087

Team Black developer

Quote from: Vaccomondus on March 20, 2016, 08:41:44 AM

Quote from: sp_ on March 20, 2016, 08:06:59 AM

The 980ti is doing 13mhash @1280 core on the 980ti with my private kernal. $5.4 a day with the current prices. Still profitable with the gpu.

your post is confusing, 5.4 a day with a 980ti mean 2.7 with a 970, which is not that good comapred to 5-6 with etheruem an other algo and btw on what coin, dash?

I wrote profitable. Not the most protitable. The 980ti and the 970 make the same mining etherum. $5-6 only 22Mhash

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 728. (Read 2347659 times)