Pages:
Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 76. (Read 2347588 times)

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
you need to relate that to the hashrate.
blake is much faster so the the gpu returns a lot quicker.

some pools accept stale shares. f.eks miningpoolhub.com so no work is lost. for coins with a fast blocktime you can change the scantime with the -s parameter
newbie
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
The x17 mod is best on the gtx 1060. The gtx 1060 aurus does 9MHASH with oc. the 1060 3gb cards are normally around 8MHASH
It is proven to be faster on all the other models as well. At least +5% faster than the alexis miner.

i want MOD C11 ? how to do ?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
There are a lot of miner developers. They just don't sell to you.

Heh. All this time, and he still ain't realized venom doesn't attract folks. Tongue

Heh, you haven't apparently realized that your singular experience doesn't apply to all interactions from an individual you don't actually talk to. Also money doesn't seem to either.

I guess the clever retort here is 'Nor does butt raping the majority of miners by selling to a handful of giant farms', which you've done when it really mattered and may have something to do with your interaction with myself.

But you know I'm not interested in sucking other peoples dicks in order to have a 'proper' business relationship. There are plenty around here that are willing to do that though.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Quote
higher intensity means more rejected shares.
never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.

i 24 is not a high intensity. blake2s and blake256 is using -i 31 without any rejects or problems

you need to relate that to the hashrate.
blake is much faster so the the gpu returns a lot quicker.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod.
Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc ))))
All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))

higher intensity means more rejected shares.
never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.
alexis and tpruvot's miners (tpruvot uses one of sp_'s kernels for blake512_80) won't work with intensity higher than 21.3 on 10x0 series. Error  in buffer allocation routine. So sp_ in his private mod changed something to avoid it. Maybe larger number for second param in launch config ... don't know ... int math and gpu-programming is difficult for me as I always worked with simulations with double type.

I see that alexis uses 128 registers (reg count) in default config but tpruvot uses less (80 as far as I remember) with some custom numbers for some algos. What is your recommendation for this setting? Does it really have affect on performance?

alexis can do >21 intensity.
it's tpruvot that can't, because of old simd code.
about regs, usually it's set by the launch config, not maxregs.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Quote
higher intensity means more rejected shares.
never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.

i 24 is not a high intensity. blake2s and blake256 is using -i 31 without any rejects or problems
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod.
Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc ))))
All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))

higher intensity means more rejected shares.
never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.
alexis and tpruvot's miners (tpruvot uses one of sp_'s kernels for blake512_80) won't work with intensity higher than 21.3 on 10x0 series. Error  in buffer allocation routine. So sp_ in his private mod changed something to avoid it. Maybe larger number for second param in launch config ... don't know ... int math and gpu-programming is difficult for me as I always worked with simulations with double type.

I see that alexis uses 128 registers (reg count) in default config but tpruvot uses less (80 as far as I remember) with some custom numbers for some algos. What is your recommendation for this setting? Does it really have affect on performance?
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod.
Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc ))))
All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))

higher intensity means more rejected shares.
never trade 1% of hashrate for crazy high intensity.
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
For you, guys. I have a screen of x17 sp mod.
Not bad but not one would expect for 0.8 btc ))))
All the trick is to mod mem allocation to support higher intensities ))
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
Windows 10, VS2013 & Cuda 8.0, pure alexis78, Release&Win32 + all  (/Ot) &  (/O2) for max speed.
All Cards MSI Gaming X
Fresh test 4u: https://ibb.co/icgbdH
2126 MHz.  Cheesy That's not what most people have in mind when they talk about gtx 1060s at PL 70%. I guess it's only possible in MSI land, with their high stock TDP.
Could you elaborate on "+ all  (/Ot) &  (/O2)" for us noobs, what is this?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
sp_,
Nice try to dump ppl , but you forgot to tell something tiny again.

Cuda 7.5 & x64  totaly too slow  on x17.  
X17  alexis78 kernels  do 8,5-9 MH/s on 1060 6GB and Cuda 8 + x32,  PL 70%

P.S cpu validation still removed ? Tongue
I got only 8mhs at 100%tdp (~2ghz clock), what I am doing wrong, interesting ... (cuda 8 x32 build)
Windows 10, VS2013 & Cuda 8.0, pure alexis78, Release&Win32 + all  (/Ot) &  (/O2) for max speed.
All Cards MSI Gaming X
Fresh test 4u: https://ibb.co/icgbdH
full member
Activity: 243
Merit: 105
People who are still buying Nvidia GPUs at hyper inflated prices (or even normal prices right now) are idiots, especially GDDR5X variants. The new batch of miners don't have a off switch and this isn't going to end well.

ROFL  Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
There are a lot of miner developers. They just don't sell to you.

Or anyone... Guess they're up there with the mystical unicorns and old bearded folk in the sky.

Last week and a half BTC is down too, by how much? Surprise, surprise 38.2%.

What a 'market'...


Not really sure what sort of point you were making there. There is no correlation between the decrease in BTC revenue and BTC value. The whole reason I was talking about BTC per card was to isolate for new network hashrate and not fluctuations in market value.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015
Last week and a half BTC is down too, by how much? Surprise, surprise 38.2%.

What a 'market'...
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
There are a lot of miner developers. They just don't sell to you.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
And Neoscrypt is now dead for Nvidia thanks to Claymore releasing a miner. That just goes to show you how much hash exists on AMDs side. Also pretty insane there aren't more programmers working on miners. There are very few things in life where you have almost no competition and can immediately corner the market by releasing a product in addition to making hand over fist money back.

For comparison a 580 has about the same hashrate as a 1070, only once again costs quite a bit less. The GPU shortage should be ending soon. Over the last week and a half, the amount of BTC per 1070 per day has declined by 33%. It was .0003BTC per 1070 per day, now it's .0002 on mainstream coins. Surprisingly, or not so much, it's now more profitable dual mining (or just normal mining) Ethereum then other coins on a 1070. As I mentioned before as we approach power costs, the stronger the coin, the better it will be at supporting larger loads. 1080/tis can't partake in mining Ethereum remotely efficiently so their price/hash ratios are going to end up being much much worse the closer we get to 0 as they can't load balance to Eth.

People who are still buying Nvidia GPUs at hyper inflated prices (or even normal prices right now) are idiots, especially GDDR5X variants. The new batch of miners don't have a off switch and this isn't going to end well.


But there is a lot of miners in the ravencoin. Yiimp.eu just opened up a new port on the server.

Yeah, which makes it even less likely to earn big when it hits exchanges. Profit from mining unlisted coins involves luck and obscurity, Ravencoin is no longer obscure.
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
sp_,
Nice try to dump ppl , but you forgot to tell something tiny again.

Cuda 7.5 & x64  totaly too slow  on x17. 
X17  alexis78 kernels  do 8,5-9 MH/s on 1060 6GB and Cuda 8 + x32,  PL 70%

P.S cpu validation still removed ? Tongue
I got only 8mhs at 100%tdp (~2ghz clock), what I am doing wrong, interesting ... (cuda 8 x32 build)
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
Corrected. The point is that NVIDIA has released many models, and they require different optimalizations to run fast. My x17 kernel is only 5% faster on the 750ti (Old 2gb Maxwell card) and 28.5% faster on the gtx 1060 6gb.

How do i buy ur miner subscriptions?
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 16
sp_,
Nice try to dump ppl , but you forgot to tell something tiny again.

Cuda 7.5 & x64  totaly too slow  on x17. 
X17  alexis78 kernels  do 8,5-9 MH/s on 1060 6GB and Cuda 8 + x32,  PL 70%

P.S cpu validation still removed ? Tongue
newbie
Activity: 210
Merit: 0
Why not give your mods away for free with dev fee built in? You would make way more money, just look how much money dev`s wallets have accumulated.... How many people can afford 0.05 btc? Not may small miners, but I would happy give away 2% dev fee, same as other tens of thousands of people.
Pages:
Jump to: