If you buy a copy of my private miner you will see than some of the algos has been optimized more than 10%
Keccak (maxcoin) is up 20%. Nobody cares becaue Keccak is not profitable to mine.
DJM34's did +10-15% Neoscrypt. Nobody cares becaue Neoscrypt is not profitable to mine.
I optimize the most profitable algos. My private bins are faster on all algos that can be mined on nicehash (750ti)
This is the only way to guarantee profit for the miner.
My buyers are happy.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 784. (Read 2347664 times)
Fleecing the noobs by comparing to ccminer1.2 in cudaminer thread lol
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13535824
sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.13535824
sp_ cmon you can also do a fair crowdfund every time you have double digit improvements rather than selling 5% improvements for 0.1 BTC
I did more. My version is faster.
you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap (and removed two "//" for your private version
)For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...
No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..
Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.
DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.
1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge
So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?
And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.
DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!
myself and Nicehash agreed on that goal as well as the time frame (which was the 24th...
I could send all the pm except it is private and none of your business
). And yes, if you want to reach your goal in time, you won't gonna say it is ok if no one send anything
(I am not good in marketing, but I am not entirely stupid either... silly goose yourself
)And if the donation pledge hadn't reached its goal (or close to it), the deal would have been off. Fair and square.
not sure what is all the drama you are making up again
That was a deal, the deal reached its goal that's it, the rest is just speculation on your side...
I did more. My version is faster.
you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap (and removed two "//" for your private version
)For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...
No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..
Dude, he's trolling pretty hard right now. DJM got his panties in a bunch because you were improving his fresh 'shiny' new miner he just released. Don't worry about it, I'm pretty sure most everyone in this thread believe you're improving the algos, Neo included I'm sure.
DJMs just a tool and doesn't like the idea of his work being obsoleted right away. Not that it really matters, Neoscrypt crapped out after FTC went out with Cryptsy.
1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge
So, uhh... How much did Nicehash pay you for your miner?
And in case you guys missed it in his thread, he had to release his miner regardless of the donation goal being reached, that's why he couldn't extend the deadline for the miner goal drive, it was already sold to Nicehash.
DJM you silly goose, you! Saying one thing and doing another!
In other news as I reported a week or so ago after Cryptsy exploded, all the algos are down right now except for Ethereum. You probably should be mining it. Unfortunately since you guys can't improve it either, there isn't that much to talk about at the moment. Perhaps work continue to work on x11? There is a lot of volume there...
Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711
Great job DJM34.
But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%
Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.
But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.
ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5
_sp release 69 get 200mh
thanks !
_sp release 69 get 200mh
thanks !
15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..
software written by others...
(I advertised what I was getting on my cards, and I still stand by it... )yes keep your noisy trolling to your own thread... and let real dev work...
... and consider making another donation to me as your next speed increase will probably depends on me and other dev to write the code you can't... (
seriously, aren't you ashamed of yourself just a little 
)the big differences between us:
1/ I am not greedy, just want to get paid for the time I spend, but most of all I do that for fun & challenge
2/ I am more interested in the challenge of getting a better and faster software (rather than in randomly tweaking the stuff out)
3/ If something doesn't work, I won't hesitate to say it, rather than making people believe that there is a speed increase so I can sell it
4/ when I make a claim it is a real one, not one I invented just to get donations
Test run cuda65.exe, both 970 and 980 up 14% from 1.5.74, thanks djm!
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060087
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 874
[2016-01-24 21:14:19] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 714
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980, 879
[2016-01-24 21:14:22] accepted: 114/114 (100.00%), 1552 kH/s yes!
[2016-01-24 21:14:23] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 970, 711
Great job DJM34.
But 14% is not the advertized +25-100%
Compiled with cuda 6.5 on Fedora 20.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.
EVGA 970 sc 640KH/s up from 580. Seven invalid nonces in 10 minutes.
Awsome work. Thanks to you SP and all the donators, especially crackfoo.
But 10.34% is not what we donated for. This kernal is not profitable. We need 25-50% to mine with a profit.
ASUS 750Ti 2Gb GPU overclocked to 1396 mgz - 227mh cuda 7.5 , 231mh cuda 6.5
_sp release 69 get 200mh
thanks !
_sp release 69 get 200mh
thanks !
15.5% is still 10% less than the claimed hashrate. You need to add another 10% to mine with a profit
A pledge to scam people just for a few satoshis..
I RENAMED IT--
I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
Yes thx scryptr I didn't know it would run all algo's.I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.
RELEASE #6--
Will release #6 of the Private Miner have a compute 5.2 edition? --scryptr
I RENAMED IT--
I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
Yes thx scryptr I didn't know it would run all algo's.I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
But since you are using a compute 5.2 card. you should use the 52 exefile in sp-private release #4 for a boost x11,x13,x15 and qubit.
Here is a profit overview with the current prices.
Rates from Sp-Mod private #5 in a 5 card rig (2x 750ti, 2x 260 1x 970)
On my testrig Neoscrypt is currently the 4th best payed algo on nicehash. quark is 10% more profitable to mine..
Rates from Sp-Mod private #5 in a 5 card rig (2x 750ti, 2x 260 1x 970)
On my testrig Neoscrypt is currently the 4th best payed algo on nicehash. quark is 10% more profitable to mine..
BRAINS!!! BRAAYIINS!!! BRAAAYIIIINS!!!!!--
My ZoombieMiner minions are hungry. As lomg as it compiles on Linux, they will continue to devour the product of your brains. I will be testing the open code on GitHub that compiles on Linux. --scryptr
My ZoombieMiner minions are hungry. As lomg as it compiles on Linux, they will continue to devour the product of your brains. I will be testing the open code on GitHub that compiles on Linux. --scryptr
NEOSCRYPT HASH RATES FOR SP_ Private Miner 5--
Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture:
EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s
Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.
I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr
scryptr how you going to do that with Neoscrypt as the exe along with ccminer.exe .... can I see your bat file when your done ?Our favorite coder has made a substantial increase in the hash rate for Neoscrypt algo in his Private Miner #5. Below is an initial picture:
EVGA GTX 960 SC miniing Neoscrypt at 420kh/s
Earlier today, the rate was 335-350kh/s on the same card with Private Miner #4. I do notice some CPU validation errors. Further, this is an initial result, after less than 5 minutes of mining.
I'll modify my auto-switch batch file in a few minutes with the new hash rate values and see which algo pops up as top paying. --scryptr
thx
BATCH FILE--
I modified my auto-switching batch file with the new hash rates for Neoscrypt. Simply copy and paste the lines between the "CUT LINE" notations into notepad and save the results as "switch.bat":
==========CUT LINE==========
:loop
C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a x11 -i 20.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:3533 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3
C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a quark -i 23.9 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4033 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,noscrypt=0.425,lyray2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3
C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a neoscrypt -i 15.5 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4233 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3
C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a lyra2v2 -i 19.1 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:5433 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3
C:\work\mine\spminer\ccminer.exe -r 0 -a qubit -i 19.7 -C --cpu-priority 5 -o stratum+tcp://hashpower.co:4733 -u Yourcoinaddy -p x11=5.5,quark=11.5,neoscrypt=0.425,lyra2v2=6.5,qubit=8.35 -b 0.0.0.0:4068
timeout /t 3
goto loop
==========CUT LINE==========
The real difference is in the hash rate value for Neoscrypt in each launch line. Another difference, from my earlier posting of this batch file, is that x13 and x15 algos have been removed, as HashPower no longer mines them. Make sure to use the correct PATH for your personal copy of CCminer.
--scryptr
I RENAMED IT--
I simply renamed sp_ 's zipped up file. It is sp_ 's version #5 of Private Miner, and a fully functional CCminer. It does not mine only Neoscrypt, it mines all the regular algos. Neoscrypt performance has been improved. Is that what you are asking? --scryptr
Here is a comparison of the two bins:
Here is the full run:
I modded and bugfixed the the first version you put out on github. The second version you published (cuda 6.5 nosync) is faster than your first chekin but doesn't work on gtx 970.
I will do another mod and gain more.
Code:
==4948== Profiling application: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
26.59% 18.4119s 796 23.131ms 15.087ms 47.744ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
26.22% 18.1600s 796 22.814ms 14.943ms 48.441ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.68% 13.6279s 796 17.121ms 13.557ms 24.808ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
18.19% 12.5939s 796 15.822ms 12.835ms 23.530ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.66% 3.22608s 796 4.0529ms 3.3128ms 5.7348ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.66% 3.22443s 796 4.0508ms 3.3958ms 6.4411ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
==5848== Profiling application: ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
25.69% 26.1063s 1164 22.428ms 15.408ms 58.151ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
25.62% 26.0341s 1164 22.366ms 15.171ms 55.874ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.71% 20.0311s 1164 17.209ms 13.479ms 29.562ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.43% 19.7487s 1164 16.966ms 13.272ms 31.282ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.80% 4.88065s 1164 4.1930ms 3.2593ms 6.5728ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.74% 4.82073s 1164 4.1415ms 3.3896ms 7.0174ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
26.59% 18.4119s 796 23.131ms 15.087ms 47.744ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
26.22% 18.1600s 796 22.814ms 14.943ms 48.441ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.68% 13.6279s 796 17.121ms 13.557ms 24.808ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
18.19% 12.5939s 796 15.822ms 12.835ms 23.530ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.66% 3.22608s 796 4.0529ms 3.3128ms 5.7348ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.66% 3.22443s 796 4.0508ms 3.3958ms 6.4411ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
==5848== Profiling application: ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
25.69% 26.1063s 1164 22.428ms 15.408ms 58.151ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
25.62% 26.0341s 1164 22.366ms 15.171ms 55.874ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.71% 20.0311s 1164 17.209ms 13.479ms 29.562ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.43% 19.7487s 1164 16.966ms 13.272ms 31.282ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.80% 4.88065s 1164 4.1930ms 3.2593ms 6.5728ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.74% 4.82073s 1164 4.1415ms 3.3896ms 7.0174ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
Here is the full run:
Code:
C:\Boss\>nvprof ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
==4948== NVPROF is profiling process 4948, command: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:56:35] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete. Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:36] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:38] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:56:46] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 656
[2016-01-24 22:56:54] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
==4948== Profiling application: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==4948== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
26.59% 18.4119s 796 23.131ms 15.087ms 47.744ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
26.22% 18.1600s 796 22.814ms 14.943ms 48.441ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.68% 13.6279s 796 17.121ms 13.557ms 24.808ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
18.19% 12.5939s 796 15.822ms 12.835ms 23.530ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.66% 3.22608s 796 4.0529ms 3.3128ms 5.7348ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.66% 3.22443s 796 4.0508ms 3.3958ms 6.4411ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
0.00% 2.7009ms 796 3.3930us 2.8480us 7.6800us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 2.4198ms 796 3.0390us 1.9200us 5.4080us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 100.13us 58 1.7260us 800ns 4.1280us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==4948== API calls:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
49.67% 11.0177s 796 13.841ms 1.3506ms 140.87ms cudaStreamSynchronize
23.54% 5.22234s 5 1.04447s 958.40ms 1.16171s cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
17.14% 3.80248s 798 4.7650ms 147.49us 390.87ms cudaDeviceSynchronize
4.61% 1.02323s 35 29.235ms 474.01us 127.75ms cudaMalloc
1.36% 302.78ms 796 380.37us 123.16us 39.274ms cudaMemcpy
1.12% 247.50ms 17 14.559ms 6.7122ms 57.145ms cudaGetDeviceProperties
0.81% 179.27ms 4776 37.535us 17.486us 1.0408ms cudaLaunch
0.55% 121.59ms 1592 76.375us 38.392us 1.5406ms cudaStreamDestroy
0.39% 86.053ms 1 86.053ms 86.053ms 86.053ms cudaDeviceReset
0.22% 49.228ms 796 61.844us 32.310us 3.9833ms cudaMemset
0.21% 47.457ms 796 59.618us 35.351us 506.32us cudaStreamQuery
0.16% 34.620ms 415 83.422us 0ns 3.8434ms cuDeviceGetAttribute
0.12% 26.464ms 1592 16.622us 1.9010us 1.8466ms cudaStreamCreate
0.04% 8.1601ms 5 1.6320ms 1.6087ms 1.7045ms cuDeviceGetName
0.03% 7.6507ms 58 131.91us 34.591us 724.89us cudaMemcpyToSymbol
0.02% 4.2546ms 11940 356ns 0ns 740.10us cudaSetupArgument
0.01% 2.2253ms 4776 465ns 0ns 11.024us cudaConfigureCall
0.00% 42.193us 5 8.4380us 7.6020us 9.1230us cuDeviceTotalMem
0.00% 23.948us 5 4.7890us 4.5620us 4.9420us cudaSetDevice
0.00% 4.5620us 10 456ns 0ns 1.1410us cuDeviceGet
0.00% 1.9000us 2 950ns 760ns 1.1400us cudaDriverGetVersion
0.00% 1.5220us 2 761ns 381ns 1.1410us cuDeviceGetCount
0.00% 761ns 3 253ns 0ns 381ns cudaGetDeviceCount
C:\Boss\>nvprof ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
SP-Mod Private #5
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
==5848== NVPROF is profiling process 5848, command: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce ccee4c85
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 387
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 00354a70
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 650
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 003764ae
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 532
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4 Found nounce ccf3909e
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 374
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] Total: 590.85 kH/s
[2016-01-24 22:57:38] GPU #3 Found nounce 99b08920
[2016-01-24 22:57:39] GPU #1 Found nounce 336afc90
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete. Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 655
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2 Found nounce 6692f03e
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 170
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:57:58] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4 Found nounce cd80fddc
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] Total: 1734.83 kH/s
==5848== Profiling application: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
25.69% 26.1063s 1164 22.428ms 15.408ms 58.151ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
25.62% 26.0341s 1164 22.366ms 15.171ms 55.874ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.71% 20.0311s 1164 17.209ms 13.479ms 29.562ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.43% 19.7487s 1164 16.966ms 13.272ms 31.282ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.80% 4.88065s 1164 4.1930ms 3.2593ms 6.5728ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.74% 4.82073s 1164 4.1415ms 3.3896ms 7.0174ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
0.00% 3.9227ms 1164 3.3690us 2.8470us 7.8720us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 3.5539ms 1164 3.0530us 1.9190us 5.5690us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 151.10us 90 1.6780us 800ns 4.0960us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==5848== API calls:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
92.54% 91.6359s 2330 39.329ms 88.568us 296.98ms cudaDeviceSynchronize
4.05% 4.01266s 5 802.53ms 686.43ms 1.01414s cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
1.13% 1.11615s 1164 958.89us 17.106us 6.5145ms cudaStreamSynchronize
1.13% 1.11531s 35 31.866ms 493.78us 129.53ms cudaMalloc
0.33% 323.72ms 25 12.949ms 6.7658ms 43.151ms cudaGetDeviceProperties
0.23% 229.81ms 6984 32.905us 19.006us 1.8063ms cudaLaunch
0.18% 179.37ms 1164 154.10us 98.831us 699.80us cudaMemcpy
0.13% 131.66ms 1164 113.11us 48.655us 27.393ms cudaStreamQuery
0.09% 87.075ms 1 87.075ms 87.075ms 87.075ms cudaDeviceReset
0.08% 76.789ms 2328 32.984us 26.228us 264.56us cudaStreamDestroy
0.04% 39.028ms 1164 33.529us 23.947us 272.93us cudaMemset
0.04% 35.107ms 415 84.595us 0ns 3.7119ms cuDeviceGetAttribute
0.02% 16.680ms 90 185.33us 33.450us 2.3845ms cudaMemcpyToSymbol
0.01% 8.4858ms 5 1.6972ms 1.6140ms 1.8592ms cuDeviceGetName
0.01% 5.9565ms 17460 341ns 0ns 990.59us cudaSetupArgument
0.01% 5.7767ms 2328 2.4810us 760ns 508.60us cudaStreamCreate
0.00% 3.7187ms 6984 532ns 0ns 808.14us cudaConfigureCall
0.00% 52.838us 5 10.567us 7.9820us 17.106us cuDeviceTotalMem
0.00% 38.012us 5 7.6020us 7.2220us 7.9820us cudaSetDevice
0.00% 2.6600us 10 266ns 0ns 380ns cuDeviceGet
0.00% 2.2800us 3 760ns 0ns 1.9000us cudaGetDeviceCount
0.00% 1.9010us 2 950ns 381ns 1.5200us cuDeviceGetCount
0.00% 1.9000us 2 950ns 760ns 1.1400us cudaDriverGetVersion
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
==4948== NVPROF is profiling process 4948, command: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:56:32] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:56:34] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:56:35] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete. Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:36] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:56:38] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:56:43] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:56:46] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:56:49] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 656
[2016-01-24 22:56:54] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
==4948== Profiling application: ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==4948== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
26.59% 18.4119s 796 23.131ms 15.087ms 47.744ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
26.22% 18.1600s 796 22.814ms 14.943ms 48.441ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.68% 13.6279s 796 17.121ms 13.557ms 24.808ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
18.19% 12.5939s 796 15.822ms 12.835ms 23.530ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.66% 3.22608s 796 4.0529ms 3.3128ms 5.7348ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.66% 3.22443s 796 4.0508ms 3.3958ms 6.4411ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
0.00% 2.7009ms 796 3.3930us 2.8480us 7.6800us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 2.4198ms 796 3.0390us 1.9200us 5.4080us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 100.13us 58 1.7260us 800ns 4.1280us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==4948== API calls:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
49.67% 11.0177s 796 13.841ms 1.3506ms 140.87ms cudaStreamSynchronize
23.54% 5.22234s 5 1.04447s 958.40ms 1.16171s cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
17.14% 3.80248s 798 4.7650ms 147.49us 390.87ms cudaDeviceSynchronize
4.61% 1.02323s 35 29.235ms 474.01us 127.75ms cudaMalloc
1.36% 302.78ms 796 380.37us 123.16us 39.274ms cudaMemcpy
1.12% 247.50ms 17 14.559ms 6.7122ms 57.145ms cudaGetDeviceProperties
0.81% 179.27ms 4776 37.535us 17.486us 1.0408ms cudaLaunch
0.55% 121.59ms 1592 76.375us 38.392us 1.5406ms cudaStreamDestroy
0.39% 86.053ms 1 86.053ms 86.053ms 86.053ms cudaDeviceReset
0.22% 49.228ms 796 61.844us 32.310us 3.9833ms cudaMemset
0.21% 47.457ms 796 59.618us 35.351us 506.32us cudaStreamQuery
0.16% 34.620ms 415 83.422us 0ns 3.8434ms cuDeviceGetAttribute
0.12% 26.464ms 1592 16.622us 1.9010us 1.8466ms cudaStreamCreate
0.04% 8.1601ms 5 1.6320ms 1.6087ms 1.7045ms cuDeviceGetName
0.03% 7.6507ms 58 131.91us 34.591us 724.89us cudaMemcpyToSymbol
0.02% 4.2546ms 11940 356ns 0ns 740.10us cudaSetupArgument
0.01% 2.2253ms 4776 465ns 0ns 11.024us cudaConfigureCall
0.00% 42.193us 5 8.4380us 7.6020us 9.1230us cuDeviceTotalMem
0.00% 23.948us 5 4.7890us 4.5620us 4.9420us cudaSetDevice
0.00% 4.5620us 10 456ns 0ns 1.1410us cuDeviceGet
0.00% 1.9000us 2 950ns 760ns 1.1400us cudaDriverGetVersion
0.00% 1.5220us 2 761ns 381ns 1.1410us cuDeviceGetCount
0.00% 761ns 3 253ns 0ns 381ns cudaGetDeviceCount
C:\Boss\>nvprof ccminerneo.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
SP-Mod Private #5
Compiled with Visual C++ 18 using Nvidia CUDA Toolkit 7.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork
CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34
Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
==5848== NVPROF is profiling process 5848, command: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 3 to cpu 1 (mask 8)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 2 to cpu 0 (mask 4)
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] 5 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm.
[2016-01-24 22:57:29] Binding thread 4 to cpu 0 (mask 10)
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #2 Found nounce 6667c303
[2016-01-24 22:57:31] GPU #0 Found nounce 000bbb86
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce cce9ae79
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4 Found nounce ccee4c85
[2016-01-24 22:57:35] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 387
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 00354a70
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 650
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0 Found nounce 003764ae
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 532
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4 Found nounce ccf3909e
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 374
[2016-01-24 22:57:36] Total: 590.85 kH/s
[2016-01-24 22:57:38] GPU #3 Found nounce 99b08920
[2016-01-24 22:57:39] GPU #1 Found nounce 336afc90
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2 Found nounce 6680eb21
[2016-01-24 22:57:40] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, exiting once miner jobs complete. Ctrl+C again to abort miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:41] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3 Found nounce 99bf3915
[2016-01-24 22:57:44] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0 Found nounce 009955c5
[2016-01-24 22:57:46] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 655
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2 Found nounce 6692f03e
[2016-01-24 22:57:47] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 170
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1 Found nounce 33baba0f
[2016-01-24 22:57:51] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:57:58] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] CTRL_C_EVENT received, aborting miner jobs
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4 Found nounce cd80fddc
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:57:59] Total: 1734.83 kH/s
==5848== Profiling application: ccminer.exe -a neoscrypt --benchmark
==5848== Profiling result:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
25.69% 26.1063s 1164 22.428ms 15.408ms 58.151ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
25.62% 26.0341s 1164 22.366ms 15.171ms 55.874ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha1_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.71% 20.0311s 1164 17.209ms 13.479ms 29.562ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_chacha2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
19.43% 19.7487s 1164 16.966ms 13.272ms 31.282ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_salsa2_stream1(int, unsigned int)
4.80% 4.88065s 1164 4.1930ms 3.2593ms 6.5728ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_ending(int, int, unsigned int, unsigned int*)
4.74% 4.82073s 1164 4.1415ms 3.3896ms 7.0174ms neoscrypt_gpu_hash_start(int, int, unsigned int)
0.00% 3.9227ms 1164 3.3690us 2.8470us 7.8720us [CUDA memset]
0.00% 3.5539ms 1164 3.0530us 1.9190us 5.5690us [CUDA memcpy DtoH]
0.00% 151.10us 90 1.6780us 800ns 4.0960us [CUDA memcpy HtoD]
==5848== API calls:
Time(%) Time Calls Avg Min Max Name
92.54% 91.6359s 2330 39.329ms 88.568us 296.98ms cudaDeviceSynchronize
4.05% 4.01266s 5 802.53ms 686.43ms 1.01414s cudaDeviceSetCacheConfig
1.13% 1.11615s 1164 958.89us 17.106us 6.5145ms cudaStreamSynchronize
1.13% 1.11531s 35 31.866ms 493.78us 129.53ms cudaMalloc
0.33% 323.72ms 25 12.949ms 6.7658ms 43.151ms cudaGetDeviceProperties
0.23% 229.81ms 6984 32.905us 19.006us 1.8063ms cudaLaunch
0.18% 179.37ms 1164 154.10us 98.831us 699.80us cudaMemcpy
0.13% 131.66ms 1164 113.11us 48.655us 27.393ms cudaStreamQuery
0.09% 87.075ms 1 87.075ms 87.075ms 87.075ms cudaDeviceReset
0.08% 76.789ms 2328 32.984us 26.228us 264.56us cudaStreamDestroy
0.04% 39.028ms 1164 33.529us 23.947us 272.93us cudaMemset
0.04% 35.107ms 415 84.595us 0ns 3.7119ms cuDeviceGetAttribute
0.02% 16.680ms 90 185.33us 33.450us 2.3845ms cudaMemcpyToSymbol
0.01% 8.4858ms 5 1.6972ms 1.6140ms 1.8592ms cuDeviceGetName
0.01% 5.9565ms 17460 341ns 0ns 990.59us cudaSetupArgument
0.01% 5.7767ms 2328 2.4810us 760ns 508.60us cudaStreamCreate
0.00% 3.7187ms 6984 532ns 0ns 808.14us cudaConfigureCall
0.00% 52.838us 5 10.567us 7.9820us 17.106us cuDeviceTotalMem
0.00% 38.012us 5 7.6020us 7.2220us 7.9820us cudaSetDevice
0.00% 2.6600us 10 266ns 0ns 380ns cuDeviceGet
0.00% 2.2800us 3 760ns 0ns 1.9000us cudaGetDeviceCount
0.00% 1.9010us 2 950ns 381ns 1.5200us cuDeviceGetCount
0.00% 1.9000us 2 950ns 760ns 1.1400us cudaDriverGetVersion
I modded and bugfixed the the first version you put out on github. The second version you published (cuda 6.5 nosync) is faster than your first chekin but doesn't work on gtx 970.
I will do another mod and gain more.
I did more. My version is faster.
you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap (and removed two "//" for your private version
)For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...
No I did more. I am not a scammer. My private bins are always the fastest. Your plegde is a scam. You promised us a 25-100% boost in the hashrate. But all we got was 10-15% A 10-15% neoscrypt kernal is not more profitable than my free opensource public kernals..
I just tested again with your fastest and latest exefile .
2 gtx 960
1 gtx 970
2 gtx 750ti
Results after 200 accepts. My version is 1.48% faster and works on the gtx970 without cpu validation errors.
ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe:
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] accepted: 196/196 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 570
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 401
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 197/197 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 198/198 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060241
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 409
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 644
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 402
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 184
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 380
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] accepted: 199/199 (100.00%), 1691 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 631
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 200/200 (100.00%), 1690 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 75
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 201/201 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 400
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 202/202 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 395
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 203/203 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 204/204 (100.00%), 1680 kH/s (yes!!!)
CCminer private sp5:
[2016-01-24 22:47:08] accepted: 183/183 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 469
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 1701 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 411
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 1703 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 615
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] Stratum set nonce 0804ABB757 with extranonce2 size=3
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 406
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 609
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 173
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 315
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 611
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 188/188 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 397
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] accepted: 189/189 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 190/190 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 168
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 191/191 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 647
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] accepted: 192/192 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 178
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 397
2 gtx 960
1 gtx 970
2 gtx 750ti
Results after 200 accepts. My version is 1.48% faster and works on the gtx970 without cpu validation errors.
ccminer_cuda65_nosync.exe:
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] accepted: 196/196 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 570
[2016-01-24 22:43:23] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 401
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 197/197 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] accepted: 198/198 (100.00%), 1687 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060241
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 409
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 644
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 402
[2016-01-24 22:43:24] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 184
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 380
[2016-01-24 22:43:25] accepted: 199/199 (100.00%), 1691 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 631
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 200/200 (100.00%), 1690 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 75
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 201/201 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 400
[2016-01-24 22:43:26] accepted: 202/202 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 395
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 203/203 (100.00%), 1679 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 407
[2016-01-24 22:43:28] accepted: 204/204 (100.00%), 1680 kH/s (yes!!!)
CCminer private sp5:
[2016-01-24 22:47:08] accepted: 183/183 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 469
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 184/184 (100.00%), 1701 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 411
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 185/185 (100.00%), 1703 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 615
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] accepted: 186/186 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] Stratum set nonce 0804ABB757 with extranonce2 size=3
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 406
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 609
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 173
[2016-01-24 22:47:09] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 179
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 315
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 187/187 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 611
[2016-01-24 22:47:10] accepted: 188/188 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 397
[2016-01-24 22:47:12] accepted: 189/189 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 177
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 190/190 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 168
[2016-01-24 22:47:13] accepted: 191/191 (100.00%), 1702 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 647
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] neoscrypt.eu.nicehash.com:3341 neoscrypt block 1060246
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #4: GeForce GTX 960, 404
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] accepted: 192/192 (100.00%), 1705 kH/s (yes!!!)
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 960, 415
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 172
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #3: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 178
[2016-01-24 22:47:14] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 970, 397
I did more. My version is faster.
you reported false information regarding my stuff all day long to sell your crap (and removed two "//" for your private version
)For me you are just acting as a greedy jealous scammer...
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).
It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total
For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.
It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).
yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator).
i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work.
Then you're on the right thread. Here you'll find the fastest free versions.
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).
It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total
For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.
It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).
yes, i know that. that's why i said (thank you for all the donator).
i'm new to this mining community. and even $5 is big in here where i live. so i am saying thank you sincerely from my heart and hope that dev can see it and take it as me respecting their hard work.
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).
It's "free" because we donated 2.5 BTC in total
For sp miner you have to donate yourself 0.1 BTC.
It's a different approach, important thing is that devs should be paid for their work (by donation or buying private miners).
I did more. My version is faster.
even if your private miner is faster by a few percent or even 50% faster than djm34 release, i still using his miner instead for a simple reason... it's FREE (thank you for all the donator).
I did more. My version is faster.
Jump to: