EVGA 1080ti with memclock -500 and 85% tdp same clocks and settings.
The sp-mod #5 is around 5% faster on the same intensity setting. (-i 25)
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 82. (Read 2347588 times)
I managed to locate the palgin mod v1.1 and perform a comparison with nist5 sp-mod #3:
EVGA 1080ti with memclock -500 and 85% tdp same clocks and settings.
The sp-mod #5 is around 5% faster on the same intensity setting. (-i 25)
EVGA 1080ti with memclock -500 and 85% tdp same clocks and settings.
The sp-mod #5 is around 5% faster on the same intensity setting. (-i 25)
palgin has removed his 1.1 binaries. Where can I get them? My mod is probobly needing abit more power to run faster, so you need to increase the tdp to 80%
I have dissapointed - my 8*gtx 1080 ti make with
nist5 sp mod3 - 601 (win 10, driver 390.77, pl 73%);
free Palgin 1.1 - 605.
Can I get previous version, please?
nist5 sp mod3 - 601 (win 10, driver 390.77, pl 73%);
free Palgin 1.1 - 605.
Can I get previous version, please?
My miners are working fine, but you bether watch out for corrupt pools. Nexus is best to solomine. My mod includes an optimized solominer, and an optimized pool miner. In my tests I get 20% more coins when solomining.
@dredg0661
Then just as of sp_ the source code.....
pool ops just can monitor submited shares and faund block and ban miners on wild guess
Then just as of sp_ the source code.....
pool ops just can monitor submited shares and faund block and ban miners on wild guess
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
Can you give me a source?
I've spoken to a few admins on the pools in discord and this doesn't seem to be true.
Really one post and you are expert??
I know for fact nexus only GPU pool banned sp miner due fake hash
Yet Altminer, yimp, and bsod all still have it?
Sounds like you are just mad because you want it for free.
Why would I want miner that fake hashes and use insane high intensity that just produce more rejects on pool?
and no not all sp miners are faking hashes and making problems with pool, just some, also not all pool exemine miners...
also the hash that miner show mean nothing if you don`t test real pool payout! but miners should know that, does he?!
I'm just asking for a source, example, or proof. I'm fine with identifying programs that are cheating the system, but at the moment it is a witch hunt with no evidence.
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
Can you give me a source?
I've spoken to a few admins on the pools in discord and this doesn't seem to be true.
Really one post and you are expert??
I know for fact nexus only GPU pool banned sp miner due fake hash
Yet Altminer, yimp, and bsod all still have it?
Sounds like you are just mad because you want it for free.
Why would I want miner that fake hashes and use insane high intensity that just produce more rejects on pool?
and no not all sp miners are faking hashes and making problems with pool, just some, also not all pool exemine miners...
also the hash that miner show mean nothing if you don`t test real pool payout! but miners should know that, does he?!
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
Can you give me a source?
I've spoken to a few admins on the pools in discord and this doesn't seem to be true.
Really one post and you are expert??
I know for fact nexus only GPU pool banned sp miner due fake hash
Yet Altminer, yimp, and bsod all still have it?
Sounds like you are just mad because you want it for free.
@sp_
Dont you sell your ccminer fork anymore ?
Dont you sell your ccminer fork anymore ?
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
Can you give me a source?
I've spoken to a few admins on the pools in discord and this doesn't seem to be true.
Really one post and you are expert??
I know for fact nexus only GPU pool banned sp miner due fake hash
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
Can you give me a source?
I've spoken to a few admins on the pools in discord and this doesn't seem to be true.
nist5 sp-mod #3 sendt to the donators.
Go and get those coins!
People, when you have benchmarks... Go and get those coins!
I love your PHI mod, but this is a joke.
Intensity 25 vs 21? Did you try higher -I with the mod?you get what you paid to scammer called sp_, if you use same intensity I bet speed would be the same, learn from this mistake
Also for anyone talking about new coins on this thread, NEVER DO THAT, you tell to sp_ he will harvest it with 1000+ GPU on low diff and you get nothing!
sp_ is the major multi switching farm abuser, and his expertise is HARVESTING and killing new coins with P/D to sell meaningless "optimized" miners!!!!!!
Not sure what the % stands for tbh.
I have used TDP (thermal design point) targeted at 63 degrees ( with the fans on turbo ) keeping the temps around 60 whit the mentioned OC and GPU usually 99%.
TDP is specified in Watts, so TDP setting of "63" will either mean you're telling the card to not burn more than 63W (in Linux), or to not exceed 63% (in Windows) of the maximum TDP that is specified in BIOS (something around 180W for gtx 1080, so 63% of that would be only ~113W max consumption, which is a serious cap for most 1080s - hence the questions).I have used TDP (thermal design point) targeted at 63 degrees ( with the fans on turbo ) keeping the temps around 60 whit the mentioned OC and GPU usually 99%.
Thank you for clarifying that.
I was confusing abbreviations there.
I am using TDP 100% - did not touch that at all but increased the fan speed to keep a lower temp (around 60 C)
Not sure what the % stands for tbh.
I have used TDP (thermal design point) targeted at 63 degrees ( with the fans on turbo ) keeping the temps around 60 whit the mentioned OC and GPU usually 99%.
TDP is specified in Watts, so TDP setting of "63" will either mean you're telling the card to not burn more than 63W (in Linux), or to not exceed 63% (in Windows) of the maximum TDP that is specified in BIOS (something around 180W for gtx 1080, so 63% of that would be only ~113W max consumption, which is a serious cap for most 1080s - hence the questions). I have used TDP (thermal design point) targeted at 63 degrees ( with the fans on turbo ) keeping the temps around 60 whit the mentioned OC and GPU usually 99%.
The reason for this is that i keep mine at +100/+550/63 TDP.
63% tdp?? Isn't that abit low?
Not sure what the % stands for tbh.
I have used TDP (thermal design point) targeted at 63 degrees ( with the fans on turbo ) keeping the temps around 60 whit the mentioned OC and GPU usually 99%.
Although i do am not aware of the long term stress on the cards, i only took into consideration the stability of the system as a whole.
Working on the x16r sp-mod This algo is abit different from the other algos because the linked chain doesn't always include all the 16 hashing algos. That meens that the speed will fluctate from 15-40MHASH. (1080ti)
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
How do you mean? Vulnerability to the miner or to the network?
That's a really big statement to be making though unless you can back it up?
Note to possible sp-mod buyers. His low-quality code is now banned with pools as it has vulnerabilities. Never pay this scammer!
The reason for this is that i keep mine at +100/+550/63 TDP.
63% tdp?? Isn't that abit low?
Jump to: