Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 826. (Read 2347664 times)

legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.

How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite  Grin

You were paid by the feathercoin community. Why would I pay you for something that is already been paid for? You worked for commission. You're not in the same shoes as SP.

I never been paid by the feathercoin community not sure why you are always making things up, I opened an ANN for a crowdfunding campaign...
, but your excuse proves, I was right not dealing with you...

Yuh and who do you think is funding you? People NOT mining with Neoscrypt? What do you mine with Neoscrypt, oh yeah Feathercoin. Just shows you how inept you are at anything other then toodling around with kernel development... and that definitely includes economics, coin development, and, of course, business.

Sure you can drudge up a few other Neoscrypt coins with almost 0 volume, community, and buy support like UFOcoin that multipools hammer all the time, but as we both know (or maybe not) those don't matter.
each time I discuss with you, I have the feeling I am discussing with a complete moron, well so you won't be surprised to learn that my opinion didn't change with that message.   Grin

I meant paid by the ftc devs (they didn't contribute in any way to the crowdfunding... ) only people wanting to mine ftc did pay for it
and apparently even 0.02btc  (around 5euros at that time) was too much for you. Hence you are probably the most irrelevant person on that whole thread when it comes to business, donation and else.  
Also since you mined ftc for quite some time that makes you a member of that community, hence as part of that community you didn't pay it either...

Uhhh... Yeah, that's the FTC community... And they already paid for your work. You worked for commission. Why would I pay you again for work you're already paid for?

If I should be paying anyone, I should be paying the people who paid you already. You don't get more money after charging someone for your work.

It'd be different if you continued to develop your work, like SP and offered continued support, however, you don't. Perhaps you should consider selling your improved FTC miner to the community... You know if you want to get paid again.

damned you are so good at spinning around a non argument...  Grin
the truth, you were able to get the release for free because, I was generous  Grin, and quite frankly, seeing the crap you are pulling here, you make me regret to not have kept it semi-private...) and other people did the effort that sucker like you didn't (except, unlike you, they don't spent their time on forum asking devs for stuffs which usually don't make even sense for which you would probably never pay...
 

Bensam--

Please, DJM34 asked for donations from ALL miners that might mine Neoscrypt.  The Neoscrypt software was released prior to the Donation Goal being met.  The link is still in DJM34's signature box, and you should donate your share.  You say that you mine Neoscrypt.  The account is still open, please donate.

The posts you make are antagonistic at times.  Programmers need their due.       --scryptr

P.S.  I just flipped another 2 cents worth into the Neoscrypt pot.       --scryptr
Thanks  Cheesy
although I wasn't really asking for donation just complaining against Bensam (who clearly talks more than he donates himself)  Grin
(but I won't refuse them  Wink )
Actually I am in discussion with Nicehash, so will see...

sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
djm34 is a good coder. Please send him some beers. His work on neoscrypt has made it one of the most profitable algos.
legendary
Activity: 1797
Merit: 1028
No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.

How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite  Grin

You were paid by the feathercoin community. Why would I pay you for something that is already been paid for? You worked for commission. You're not in the same shoes as SP.

I never been paid by the feathercoin community not sure why you are always making things up, I opened an ANN for a crowdfunding campaign...
, but your excuse proves, I was right not dealing with you...

Yuh and who do you think is funding you? People NOT mining with Neoscrypt? What do you mine with Neoscrypt, oh yeah Feathercoin. Just shows you how inept you are at anything other then toodling around with kernel development... and that definitely includes economics, coin development, and, of course, business.

Sure you can drudge up a few other Neoscrypt coins with almost 0 volume, community, and buy support like UFOcoin that multipools hammer all the time, but as we both know (or maybe not) those don't matter.
each time I discuss with you, I have the feeling I am discussing with a complete moron, well so you won't be surprised to learn that my opinion didn't change with that message.   Grin

I meant paid by the ftc devs (they didn't contribute in any way to the crowdfunding... ) only people wanting to mine ftc did pay for it
and apparently even 0.02btc  (around 5euros at that time) was too much for you. Hence you are probably the most irrelevant person on that whole thread when it comes to business, donation and else.  
Also since you mined ftc for quite some time that makes you a member of that community, hence as part of that community you didn't pay it either...

Uhhh... Yeah, that's the FTC community... And they already paid for your work. You worked for commission. Why would I pay you again for work you're already paid for?

If I should be paying anyone, I should be paying the people who paid you already. You don't get more money after charging someone for your work.

It'd be different if you continued to develop your work, like SP and offered continued support, however, you don't. Perhaps you should consider selling your improved FTC miner to the community... You know if you want to get paid again.

damned you are so good at spinning around a non argument...  Grin
the truth, you were able to get the release for free because, I was generous  Grin, and quite frankly, seeing the crap you are pulling here, you make me regret to not have kept it semi-private...) and other people did the effort that sucker like you didn't (except, unlike you, they don't spent their time on forum asking devs for stuffs which usually don't make even sense for which you would probably never pay...
 

Bensam--

Please, DJM34 asked for donations from ALL miners that might mine Neoscrypt.  The Neoscrypt software was released prior to the Donation Goal being met.  The link is still in DJM34's signature box, and you should donate your share.  You say that you mine Neoscrypt.  The account is still open, please donate.

The posts you make are antagonistic at times.  Programmers need their due.       --scryptr

P.S.  I just flipped another 2 cents worth into the Neoscrypt pot.       --scryptr
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.

How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite  Grin

You were paid by the feathercoin community. Why would I pay you for something that is already been paid for? You worked for commission. You're not in the same shoes as SP.

I never been paid by the feathercoin community not sure why you are always making things up, I opened an ANN for a crowdfunding campaign...
, but your excuse proves, I was right not dealing with you...

Yuh and who do you think is funding you? People NOT mining with Neoscrypt? What do you mine with Neoscrypt, oh yeah Feathercoin. Just shows you how inept you are at anything other then toodling around with kernel development... and that definitely includes economics, coin development, and, of course, business.

Sure you can drudge up a few other Neoscrypt coins with almost 0 volume, community, and buy support like UFOcoin that multipools hammer all the time, but as we both know (or maybe not) those don't matter.
each time I discuss with you, I have the feeling I am discussing with a complete moron, well so you won't be surprised to learn that my opinion didn't change with that message.   Grin

I meant paid by the ftc devs (they didn't contribute in any way to the crowdfunding... ) only people wanting to mine ftc did pay for it
and apparently even 0.02btc  (around 5euros at that time) was too much for you. Hence you are probably the most irrelevant person on that whole thread when it comes to business, donation and else.  
Also since you mined ftc for quite some time that makes you a member of that community, hence as part of that community you didn't pay it either...

Uhhh... Yeah, that's the FTC community... And they already paid for your work. You worked for commission. Why would I pay you again for work you're already paid for?

If I should be paying anyone, I should be paying the people who paid you already. You don't get more money after charging someone for your work.

It'd be different if you continued to develop your work, like SP and offered continued support, however, you don't. Perhaps you should consider selling your improved FTC miner to the community... You know if you want to get paid again.

damned you are so good at spinning around a non argument...  Grin
the truth, you were able to get the release for free because, I was generous  Grin, and quite frankly, seeing the crap you are pulling here, you make me regret to not have kept it semi-private...) and other people did the effort that sucker like you didn't (except, unlike you, they don't spent their time on forum asking devs for stuffs which usually don't make even sense for which you would probably never pay...
 
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.

Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.

I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.

How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite  Grin

You were paid by the feathercoin community. Why would I pay you for something that is already been paid for? You worked for commission. You're not in the same shoes as SP.

I never been paid by the feathercoin community not sure why you are always making things up, I opened an ANN for a crowdfunding campaign...
, but your excuse proves, I was right not dealing with you...

Yuh and who do you think is funding you? People NOT mining with Neoscrypt? What do you mine with Neoscrypt, oh yeah Feathercoin. Just shows you how inept you are at anything other then toodling around with kernel development... and that definitely includes economics, coin development, and, of course, business.

Sure you can drudge up a few other Neoscrypt coins with almost 0 volume, community, and buy support like UFOcoin that multipools hammer all the time, but as we both know (or maybe not) those don't matter.
each time I discuss with you, I have the feeling I am discussing with a complete moron, well so you won't be surprised to learn that my opinion didn't change with that message.   Grin

I meant paid by the ftc devs (they didn't contribute in any way to the crowdfunding... ) only people wanting to mine ftc did pay for it
and apparently even 0.02btc  (around 5euros at that time) was too much for you. Hence you are probably the most irrelevant person on that whole thread when it comes to business, donation and else.  
Also since you mined ftc for quite some time that makes you a member of that community, hence as part of that community you didn't pay it either...

Uhhh... Yeah, that's the FTC community... And they already paid for your work. You worked for commission. Why would I pay you again for work you're already paid for?

If I should be paying anyone, I should be paying the people who paid you already. You don't get more money after charging someone for your work.

It'd be different if you continued to develop your work, like SP and offered continued support, however, you don't. Perhaps you should consider selling your improved FTC miner to the community... You know if you want to get paid again.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
@sp i am using rel 70 to mine neoscrypt & i have seen that after  2-3 days of mining ccminer.exe starts using 500-600 mb RAM for 970 & 300-400 mb RAm for 750ti. Please check if there is a memory leak or something. It starts at 100mb & 80mb for 970 & 750ti resp. but grows over time. I am on Win7 using your official release binary.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
@sp_ can you please post numbers for 14 round blake so ican post them in decred thread. thanks
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Submitted another optimalization 1-2% faster (@github)
Just tested on my 980ti and 980.

release 77++ (git)

980ti: 4.1GHASH
980:  3.05GHASH
970: 2,62GHASH 2,63MHASH
960: 1,68GHASH 1,71MHASH
750ti: 912MHASH 930MHASH
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
release 77+ (git)

750ti: 912MHASH
970: 2,62GHASH
960: 1,68GHASH

blake 8 rounds chart (AMD):


6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
How about the 980ti. My guess is 3.8 gig.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
release 77+ (git)

750ti: 912MHASH
970: 2,62GHASH
960: 1,68GHASH

blake 8 rounds chart (AMD):


6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Thanks for all your answers. Smiley
@sp_ if i make some profit from this i would be looking for an optimized version Wink

are nvidia cards competitive (on blake 14 rounds) with amd?

sp_ posted some numbers a few days back & it seems amd has a little edge but its pretty competitive & with an optimized version i am sure we will have an edge. 280x was around 3Gh/s i guess
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I just made it 5% faster in 5 minutes. Smiley you have to build yourself or wait for release 78
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Thanks for all your answers. Smiley
@sp_ if i make some profit from this i would be looking for an optimized version Wink

are nvidia cards competitive (on blake 14 rounds) with amd?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Thanks for all your answers. Smiley
@sp_ if i make some profit from this i would be looking for an optimized version Wink
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
I submitted a 70MHASH speedup in the blake-256 8 and 14 rounds. (@github)


750ti: 902MHASH 912MHASH
970: 2,55GHASH 2,62GHASH
960: 1,6GHASH  1,68GHASH
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
14 rounds is already implemented in sp-mod release 77

ccminer -a blake          (14 rounds)
ccminer -a blakecoin ... (8 rounds)

14 rounds:


750ti: 495MHASH
970: 1,5GHASH
960: 952MHASH

8 rounds:

750ti: 902MHASH
970: 2,55GHASH
960: 1,6GHASH
legendary
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
can any devs answer this? Decred is going to use 14 round Blake-256 algo, i am assuming this cannot be mined using current ccminer. SO will it need a new miner or little tweaks and again if anyone is interested in coding a new miner please do contact decred devs. thanks

I've read that it's just blakecoin with 14 rounds instead of 8, so the changes should be trivial.
Then some optimising will need to be done, but it should work.
That is, assuming the coin doesn't have some new weird protocol, like Sia or ether ;-)
I think the original blake code is 14 rounds (but was change to 8 for some coin) I think epsylon3 implementation takes already care of this...
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
can any devs answer this? Decred is going to use 14 round Blake-256 algo, i am assuming this cannot be mined using current ccminer. SO will it need a new miner or little tweaks and again if anyone is interested in coding a new miner please do contact decred devs. thanks

I've read that it's just blakecoin with 14 rounds instead of 8, so the changes should be trivial.
Then some optimising will need to be done, but it should work.
That is, assuming the coin doesn't have some new weird protocol, like Sia or ether ;-)

AFAIK its completely comatible with whatever bitcoin does, one of there aim is to make sure that any development they do can adopted in bitcoin & vice versa, so i dont think there will be a problem.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
can any devs answer this? Decred is going to use 14 round Blake-256 algo, i am assuming this cannot be mined using current ccminer. SO will it need a new miner or little tweaks and again if anyone is interested in coding a new miner please do contact decred devs. thanks

I've read that it's just blakecoin with 14 rounds instead of 8, so the changes should be trivial.
Then some optimising will need to be done, but it should work.
That is, assuming the coin doesn't have some new weird protocol, like Sia or ether ;-)
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
can any devs answer this? Decred is going to use 14 round Blake-256 algo, i am assuming this cannot be mined using current ccminer. SO will it need a new miner or little tweaks and again if anyone is interested in coding a new miner please do contact decred devs. thanks
Jump to: