No point in mining Neoscrypt on AMD Cards when you can mine etherum and double the profit.
I was just saying that we (as nvidia) don't have the edge on neoscypt any longer.
And that the payouts will get lower 'cause of the higher hashrate.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 828. (Read 2347664 times)
No point in mining Neoscrypt on AMD Cards when you can mine etherum and double the profit.
I was just saying that we (as nvidia) don't have the edge on neoscypt any longer.
And that the payouts will get lower 'cause of the higher hashrate.
No point in mining Neoscrypt on AMD Cards when you can mine etherum and double the profit.
I was just saying that we (as nvidia) don't have the edge on neoscypt any longer.
And that the payouts will get lower 'cause of the higher hashrate.
No point in mining Neoscrypt on AMD Cards when you can mine etherum and double the profit.
@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.
BLAKECOIN--Thanks. I did some checking. BlakeCoin spiked yesterday. Apparently, an FPGA can process the algo, a 750ti is OK, and a 980ti will match an AMD 290X.
--scryptr
I haven't switched to dot 77+ yet because of Neoscrypt. I haven't mined any Blake algo coins either, but apparently BlakeCoin was mineable with CudaMiner back in 2013-2014.
My GTX 960 gets 340kh/s mining Neoscrypt with the latest NiceHash Miner, that makes my GTX 960 as fast as an AMD 280X with the latest NiceHash Miner. They are still using your release dot 74. If you did a hybrid compile (Pallas), NiceHash may incorporate your release dot 77+. Neoscrypt is still a top-paying algo at NiceHash, and AMD code is really being optimized there.
I may do some benchmark tests. --scryptr
Blakecoin is minable in cudaminer, but ccminer sp-mod release 77 is 100% faster.
So 340Khash @ r9 280x is only 60% bether than the opensource.. But on the Nano and the furyx the rate is above 600khash.
@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.
BLAKECOIN--
Thanks. I did some checking. BlakeCoin spiked yesterday. Apparently, an FPGA can process the algo, a 750ti is OK, and a 980ti will match an AMD 290X.
--scryptr
Blakecoin is faster compiled with cuda 7.5 (latest release 77). What are your numbers?
NEOSCRYPT--
I haven't switched to dot 77+ yet because of Neoscrypt. I haven't mined any Blake algo coins either, but apparently BlakeCoin was mineable with CudaMiner back in 2013-2014.
My GTX 960 gets 340kh/s mining Neoscrypt with the latest NiceHash Miner, that makes my GTX 960 as fast as an AMD 280X with the latest NiceHash Miner. They are still using your release dot 74. If you did a hybrid compile (Pallas), NiceHash may incorporate your release dot 77+. Neoscrypt is still a top-paying algo at NiceHash, and AMD code is really being optimized there.
I may do some benchmark tests. --scryptr
@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.
BLAKECOIN--
Thanks. I did some checking. BlakeCoin spiked yesterday. Apparently, an FPGA can process the algo, a 750ti is OK, and a 980ti will match an AMD 290X.
--scryptr
Blakecoin is faster compiled with cuda 7.5 (latest release 77). What are your numbers?
300%
A r9 280x did 200khash with the old kernal. and 600 now?
A r9 280x did 200khash with the old kernal. and 600 now?
300kh/s isn't really impressive my version is doing 850kh on the 980
my version is doing 850kh on the 980 
Quote
If the hashrate is too low poolside, increase the diff until you get rejects locally.
--diff 0.00390625 is the only setting that gets me no local rejects but only gives 1/10 the hash on the pool. All other diff settings in multiples of 2 or divisions of 2 give rejects and still not the correct hash at the pool.
if i increase the diff over and above 1.0 in multiples of 2, the miner starts submitting faster and faster with 0 accepts.
Quote
even at 10 mBTC/GH/day neoscrypt was just barely profitable for maxwell. and it hasn't seen that rate in a while
@impulse2000 what does your bat file look like for myr-gr algo? does the pool-side hashrate agree with your local hashrate?
i'm still only able to get 10% of local hashrate to show at the pool , even using --diff 0.039xxxx
i'm still only able to get 10% of local hashrate to show at the pool , even using --diff 0.039xxxx
If the hashrate is too low poolside, increase the diff until you get rejects locally.
@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.
BLAKECOIN--
Thanks. I did some checking. BlakeCoin spiked yesterday. Apparently, an FPGA can process the algo, a 750ti is OK, and a 980ti will match an AMD 290X.
--scryptr
@scryptr its for blake-256 ie blakecoin algo.
No one has released anything new in close to six months or so it seems. Everything that has been talked about here is old hat or the same epeen wars. Where you talk about how fast your super optimized miner is you only sell to a handful of really rich individuals.
Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.
I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.
Biggest improvement has come from Nicehash returning dividends with their paid bounty program, but that only applies to AMD.
I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything.
How would you know ? you never donated for neoscrypt, you just started mining it after I decided to release the source publicly.
Such an hypocrite
6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
TRYING TO GUESS--
Which algo are you posting data for? --scryptr
6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
TRYING TO GUESS--
Which algo are you posting data for? Blake? --scryptr
Thanks for the info, very much competitive i would say, still just contact decred devs to discuss the bounty if there are any further optimization possible. This is to all devs.
Also can anyone give me hashrates for 970 & 750ti. TIA.
Also can anyone give me hashrates for 970 & 750ti. TIA.
6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
I joined the Nvidia mining community because it was more open and forthright then AMD mining. That seems to have died out and turned back into the same shit as the AMD community. Nothing improves or changes. I still end up going back and mining Neoscrypt with ancient miners (that are definitely outdated). Donating doesn't do anything. There aren't any fund drives or anything either (or a way for me as a miner to buy a kernel). Everything has completely stagnated, which is what happened about six months before I had to stop mining with AMD hardware.
In 6 months my fork has 350 commits and 14 releases. Almost all the algos have been optimized (up to 70% faster)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases
Jump to: