Digibyte popped. Based on how hard it's getting hammered by miners right now I don't think it's much of a secret.
Seems as though there is some problems with myr-groestl and skein on ccminer. Comparing it to the Tpruvot version myr-gr, the SP version produces higher hashrates even though the hashrate is much lower poolside. The SP is reporting about 50% higher hashrate, however poolside it is operating about at 10% of the Trpuvot version.
Skein is in the same boat. SP is reporting it about 20% higher then the Tpruvot version, but poolside it's about 30% slower.
It seems as though the SP is also reporting a bunch of 'above share target' messages, where as the Tpruvot version is not.
Also worth noting it seems as though Tpruvot is using the CPU assisted method with -C and it pegs your processors for all the algos, however turning -C on for SP does not fix the aforementioned problems.
The only version of SP-CCminer that is working well with DGB right now is qubit.
None of this really matters though. Nvidia hardware is about on par, if not a bit slower then AMD hardware in all the above algos with publicly available miners (Pallas's included), so it's not going to matter much as the Ethereum horde switches over to DGB and crushes it.
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 901. (Read 2347659 times)
But still slow. My modded lyra2v2 compute 5.2 opensource kernal is only using 7 threads per block.. and very little power..
DJm34's private kernal is already doing over 15MHASH on his GTX 980
If you look at my optimized quark kernal the gtx 970 is almost doing 3 times the speed of a 750ti.
But only 2x in the lyra2v2
DJm34's private kernal is already doing over 15MHASH on his GTX 980
If you look at my optimized quark kernal the gtx 970 is almost doing 3 times the speed of a 750ti.
But only 2x in the lyra2v2
Ubuntu 14.04 - Release 70 - Run very simple .bat with default -i for Lyra2rev2
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
Update: +105 core
960: ~ 6180 kh/s
970: ~ 10300 kh/s
Use Cuda 6.5
My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
In my case, Cuda 7.5 is faster than Cuda 6.5.My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
I don't know if i can change the BIOS of the 750 with Ubuntu, neither the GPU clock
1. Mod Bios in Windows (fast & easy). However, I don't notice any different between TDP 38/46/65.5 on my Gigabyte gtx750ti
2. Enable overclock feature in Ubuntu: sudo nvidia-xconfig -a --cool-bits=28
I get 10.2MHASH on the gtx970 windforce G1 with +100Mhz on the core
Use Cuda 6.5
My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
In my case, Cuda 7.5 is faster than Cuda 6.5.My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
I don't know if i can change the BIOS of the 750 with Ubuntu, neither the GPU clock
Ubuntu 14.04 - Release 70 - Run very simple .bat with default -i for Lyra2rev2
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
I also compiled with CUDA 7.5
Use Cuda 6.5
My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
My numbers are:
Lyra2v2 on the 750ti Asus strix +100 Mhz core and mem 5Mhash (windows,x86 cuda 6.5)
The gtx 750 is doing 4.3MHASH on 1500MHz core and modified bios. (Increased TDP)
Ubuntu 14.04.
Cuda 7.5
Release 70 (one week ago vs. version 68).
Lyra2REv2 :
--------------
Faster for GTX 750 (3.4 MH/s vs 2.9) : very good job for the compute 5.0 :-)
Slower for GTX 960 (5.8 MH/s vs.6.2) :-(
I hope the best for the anniversary release
Edit : my release 70 was compiled one week ago (october 06) : the today one is a little slower on Quark (GTX 750 and 960) and just a very little bit faster on Lyra2REv2 with the GTX 750 (+ 50 kHash/s)
Cuda 7.5
Release 70 (one week ago vs. version 68).
Lyra2REv2 :
--------------
Faster for GTX 750 (3.4 MH/s vs 2.9) : very good job for the compute 5.0 :-)
Slower for GTX 960 (5.8 MH/s vs.6.2) :-(
I hope the best for the anniversary release
Edit : my release 70 was compiled one week ago (october 06) : the today one is a little slower on Quark (GTX 750 and 960) and just a very little bit faster on Lyra2REv2 with the GTX 750 (+ 50 kHash/s)
Ubuntu 14.04 - Release 70 - Run very simple .bat with default -i for Lyra2rev2
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
6 x 750ti +135 core/ +200 mem: 28880 kh/s
960: 5840 kh/s
970: 9760 kh/s
Lyra2rev2 -i 20.2
6 750 ti 1.5.70 Hash 28720 (4786.66 per card)
6 750 ti 1.5.70 Commit 1115 Hash 28646 (4774.33 per card)
Windows 8.1 Pro Driver 358.50
gpu engine clock?
Lyra2rev2 -i 20.2
6 750 ti 1.5.70 Hash 28720 (4786.66 per card)
6 750 ti 1.5.70 Commit 1115 Hash 28646 (4774.33 per card)
Windows 8.1 Pro Driver 358.50
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] quark.usa.nicehash.com:3345 quark block 2307097
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 27665
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 28538
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7109
Release 70 on windows 10
all 3 are 100+ on core.
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 27665
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980 Ti, 28538
[2015-10-14 11:17:35] GPU #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 7109
Release 70 on windows 10
all 3 are 100+ on core.
windows? linux?
750?
750ti?
960?
950?
970?
980?
980ti?
750?
750ti?
960?
950?
970?
980?
980ti?
Did you compare with release 70?
Wich card / algo?
Wich card / algo?
release 70 lyra 2v2 and quark slightly faster.
Did you compare with release 70?
Wich card / algo?
Wich card / algo?
Looks like the cryptomining blog has made another binary:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6116-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-70-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell-2/
This is just the latest from yesterday. Buildt from github.
Small boost in lyra2v2 and quark.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6116-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-70-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell-2/
This is just the latest from yesterday. Buildt from github.
Small boost in lyra2v2 and quark.
Slightly slower.
Looks like the cryptomining blog has made another binary:
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6116-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-70-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell-2/
This is just the latest from yesterday. Buildt from github.
Small boost in lyra2v2 and quark.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/6116-updated-windows-binary-of-the-ccminer-1-5-70-git-fork-by-sp-for-maxwell-2/
This is just the latest from yesterday. Buildt from github.
Small boost in lyra2v2 and quark.
It looks like cuda 7.5 is ok for x11, quark and lyra, but it's a no no for neoscrypt.
I've tried optimising the cuda code for it specifically, but couldn't get anything better than -20% compared to cuda 6.5.
I've tried optimising the cuda code for it specifically, but couldn't get anything better than -20% compared to cuda 6.5.
I managed to improve it to -10% compared to 7.5. (x11) Quark is much worse.
I removed all the maxregcount and all the launchbounds configs and let cuda 7.5 figure it out.
Crysx said he installed cuda 7.5 and x11 was a tiny bit faster than with 6.5.
I guess it may be because he's on linux...
yup - thats right ...
i did get slightly better hashrates in f22x64c7.5 than with f20x64c6.5 with x11 and quark an lyra2v2 ...
but the latest on git that was just compiled - have gone back to the broken hashrates of f22x64c7.0.28 in x11 - but faster in quark and lyra2v2 ...
i havent tried neoscrypt ... though the x11 is disappointing in speed with the latest commit ...
btw - the stats issue i had with two of the machines is now no longer an issue on those machines since upgrading to f22x64c7.5 ... all the stats ( temp and fan and clocks ) all work ...
#crysx
Interesting.
I started this thread 17-oct-2014 and now it has got over 400 000 views. (More than 1000 views per day)
In 3 days we have a 1 year anniversary. I should put a birthday present into release 71.
71 releases in 365 days. A new binary every 1.3 Week.
I started this thread 17-oct-2014 and now it has got over 400 000 views. (More than 1000 views per day)
In 3 days we have a 1 year anniversary. I should put a birthday present into release 71.
71 releases in 365 days. A new binary every 1.3 Week.
yay ...
that should be a huge milestone ...
lets celebrate it somehow ...
#crysx
Jump to: