What happened? miners are no longer on sale or is the new one being prepared? 
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 94. (Read 2347597 times)
where did the table from the first page go What happened? miners are no longer on sale or is the new one being prepared?
What happened? miners are no longer on sale or is the new one being prepared?
The 40 mhs on a 1080ti on phi is with a power limit at 120%
Any LIZ (skein) optimized miner ?
hey SP, do your mods run in linux?
i got a buddy thats gonna go in with me for one of your mods, but he needs it on linux
i can't do the 0.05 alone right now , i have 2 other of your mods hehe
If you can include a linux binary, lets make a deal!
i got a buddy thats gonna go in with me for one of your mods, but he needs it on linux
i can't do the 0.05 alone right now
, i have 2 other of your mods heheIf you can include a linux binary, lets make a deal!
I PMed you also
Working on lux #2 with a fee. 44 MHASH.
Free update to the donators.
When do you want to release? Free update to the donators.
I get 83mh on nist5 with a 1080ti with 70% power on a free miner 
Which one do you use? Nothing is free is Russia Rednow 
There is always a catch.
There is always a catch.Just send him the MD5 values for your miners so he can verify you sent him the right ones.
lux sp-mod $16.21 per day on the 1080ti.
used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.
0.05btc
https://i.imgur.com/4WIDSoP.png
https://i.imgur.com/4iqTvK2.png
used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.
0.05btc
https://i.imgur.com/4WIDSoP.png
https://i.imgur.com/4iqTvK2.png
But real profit is like 40% less than wahttomine says, at least in PHI algoritm.
i agree with this. based on whattomine i should get 1.1 but what i get in yiimp was .4-6 per day only. my average hashrate on yiimp is near on ccminer reported hashrate
*gasp* they're getting smarter and actually look at their profits. Probably not, they're still looking at the pool 'actual profits', but at least it's a start. That's not the only inconsistency.
A miner fee still violates the GPL.
If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee
If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.
GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?
Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.
Two obvious things:
1. You are hopeless case of person not capable to clean after shitting around.
2. sp_ is going to release sources at the moment some open source foundation realizes that sp_ collected enough money breaking GPL to raise charges against.
Great insult. You should stick to cherry picking a sentence without context from the entirety of paragraphs they're used in as it seems to be the only way you can win a argument. You're like the guy that was in here arguing grammar, punctuation, and spelling as if that makes for any sort of argument outside of an english class.
"Hopless case..." I don't think that means what you think it does. Hue hue. Strawmen are fun. BTW for those of you that are interested in what the kids do to try and win arguments when they don't have the mental capacity to do so they make strawmen. Here is a little tidbit from wiki, trolls online generally do things like this:
Quote
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be "attacking a straw man".
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.
Allegedly, straw man tactics were once known in some parts of the United Kingdom as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.
The typical straw man argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition through the covert replacement of it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and the subsequent refutation of that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the opponent's proposition.[2][3]
This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or an understanding of both sides of the issue.
Allegedly, straw man tactics were once known in some parts of the United Kingdom as an Aunt Sally, after a pub game of the same name where patrons threw sticks or battens at a post to knock off a skittle balanced on top.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
That's neat, you're still a beggar that thinks harping on someone about how they make money will get you free things. And no, they aren't going to sue him. You aren't going to sue him. No one here is going to do anything about this, it's just a bunch of beggars, like yourself, trying to get things for free through guilt.
You give no shits about the GPL beyond how you can make money. If you did you would actually be attempting to help him make his work GPL compliant, like either writing a miner that could take protected modules for speed or funding such a project. No you don't put money where your mouth is? Oh, maybe this isn't just about doing the 'right' thing...
This is what one gets when asking bensam1231 for one sentence response. Tons of shit around...
Simple as this:
Your claim: "A miner fee still violates the GPL."
My claim: "You're wrong because a miner fee doesn't violate the GPL, but lack of source files".
Keep shitting.
And lets add some context to that because you like making strawmen.
Wow another dumbass. I don't think you have any concept of digital rights management at all.
Like I've mentioned before, people don't care about GPL, they just say whatever they think will get them free things.
Lets look at this a different way. You're a coder who codes for a job, your work depends on open source work (GPL) code, how do you get paid without violating the GPL? You obviously don't get paid by giving your work away. A miner fee still violates the GPL.
It doesn't matter if 'you' don't think his work is being stolen, it is being stolen and as such he can decide who he wants to sell it to, sell it at all, and define the terms of selling it.
Like I've mentioned before, people don't care about GPL, they just say whatever they think will get them free things.
Lets look at this a different way. You're a coder who codes for a job, your work depends on open source work (GPL) code, how do you get paid without violating the GPL? You obviously don't get paid by giving your work away. A miner fee still violates the GPL.
It doesn't matter if 'you' don't think his work is being stolen, it is being stolen and as such he can decide who he wants to sell it to, sell it at all, and define the terms of selling it.
That is my claim. You can't decide what is and isn't my argument based on cherry picking information. Not to pull the third world card again, but seriously, is this how you debate things where you're from? I know you're trying to mimic the last guy who was being a grammar nazi by super cherry picking a part of what I'm talking about, but in no way shape or form does it disprove the entirety of my argument or even the multiple points I make. You're pretty stupid if you think it does.
I get 83mh on nist5 with a 1080ti with 70% power on a free miner
That’s a pretty nice result for free miner
I get 83mh on nist5 with a 1080ti with 70% power on a free miner
I am mining neoscrypt with 4 different nvidia cards. Is there a way to set the intensity for each individual card running 1 instance of the miner?
Yes, there is is, just set parameter - I 15,20,22,16 - where figures are individual intensity for your cards as you need, you may change them and adjust accordingly
Thank you......weird, I tried to set different intensities for each card and it just resets them to default or less.
is anyone aware of 1050 ti hashrate on lux?
1080ti sp-mod results
phi #1: around 40 MHASH
tribus #2: around 125 MHASH (- 2% fee)
nist5 N/A
x17 N/A
phi #1: around 40 MHASH
tribus #2: around 125 MHASH (- 2% fee)
nist5 N/A
x17 N/A
so are you going to share this one or should we donate to get it?
x17 not for sell
I have 12X1080ti and I’m new into mining - was thinking about nicehash, but as I see if I can get here 16$ per card per day with LUX and modified miner ,it’s Insane - what I need to do in order to mine LUXcoin with those miners and how do I get them ?
And how do I can calculate profit with them ?
So many new coins, its crazy .)
1080ti sp-mod results
phi #1: around 40 MHASH
tribus #2: around 125 MHASH (- 2% fee)
nist5 N/A
x17 N/A
phi #1: around 40 MHASH
tribus #2: around 125 MHASH (- 2% fee)
nist5 N/A
x17 N/A
so are you going to share this one or should we donate to get it?
x17 not for sell
https://github.com/todd1251/ccminer-x16r/releases/tag/2.2.5-x16r
Sorry what is .bat for this miner with nvidia ?
with ccminer-x64 -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://rvn.suprnova.cc:6666 -u USER -p pass
have some not validate cpu .
Sorry what is .bat for this miner with nvidia ?
with ccminer-x64 -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://rvn.suprnova.cc:6666 -u USER -p pass
have some not validate cpu .
I am mining neoscrypt with 4 different nvidia cards. Is there a way to set the intensity for each individual card running 1 instance of the miner?
Yes, there is is, just set parameter - I 15,20,22,16 - where figures are individual intensity for your cards as you need, you may change them and adjust accordingly
lux sp-mod $16.21 per day on the 1080ti.
used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.
0.05btc
used by 40% of the miners on yiimp.eu.
0.05btc
But real profit is like 40% less than wahttomine says, at least in PHI algoritm.
i agree with this. based on whattomine i should get 1.1 but what i get in yiimp was .4-6 per day only. my average hashrate on yiimp is near on ccminer reported hashrate
I am mining neoscrypt with 4 different nvidia cards. Is there a way to set the intensity for each individual card running 1 instance of the miner?
Can you PM me please, with price etc.
Jump to: