If You try to elaborate this, I believe community will witness first case of "bensam1231 admits it was wrong about".
One sentence please.
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#SubscriptionFee
If you're going to talk about GPL, go to their easy to use website and just site me the topic matter. They literally cover everything. If he charges a 'subscription', he still has to give the source to everyone that uses it. Just the same as with a one time fee.
GPL violation is because of not giving away source files, not because of fee. So, Your statement "A miner fee still violates the GPL" is wrong. Do You agree?
Obviously SP isn't going to release the source dumbass, the entire conversation was literally about him not doing that. Like there is no room for a different interpretation of what we were talking about. Backpedal away though.