asus strix gtx750ti @ 1402/5202
quark, default settings
R67 12h@nicehash 6.83mh / zero rejects
R68 12h@nicehash 6.79mh / 0.18mh rejects
Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 941. (Read 2347664 times)
I lost about 20 btc on an exchange that got "hacked", although I think they just took it all and ran. When it was up to about 1100$ a while ago.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
I got 26,7MHASH per 980ti the last time I checked.(haven't tested release 68 yet) Standard clocks/standard intensity.
But my card is a gigabyte windforce oc. The core is clocked at 1288 I think.
Nah, If you have a 20% faster miner than everybody else, you build a BIG farm and ROI a 750ti-980ti card every day 
And then you wait for the competition to wake up...
I think it would be good money to make a etherum miner for the 750ti. Such a coin. Such a profit.
You have $200k for such a endeavor? Something to consider is you're actually crowd funding your 'investment' in a farm when you distribute it to everyone. You're essentially taking a piece of everyones farm, which is impossible to build on your own and you don't have ROI costs. Nor do you lose money when your enhancements go to waste, for instance, 20% faster L2V2 still isn't making more then Quark right now.And then you wait for the competition to wake up...
I think it would be good money to make a etherum miner for the 750ti. Such a coin. Such a profit.
Not worth the risk.
I have a few rigs, and I keep buying some more slowly. With the low BTC price and high energy costs it's not worth it. But If I break even I still have alot of nice hardware to play with.
In order to make a living of making mining software you need to be able to optimize every algo 10-20% and do it before anybody else. Wolf0 is the only one I know who can do that.
bensam1231 , I don't have watt meter . I think it's a consumption of 120 watts . Voltage standard 1.193 .Don't increase the voltage . Just increase the TDP BIOS . See the screenshot ..
Hmmm... Every miner should have a watt meter. Buy one for $18 on Newegg (Don't get a Kill-A-Watt, they break like clockwork every month).
Voltage doesn't tell a whole lot or TDP as Manufacturers change it around.
I lost about 20 btc on an exchange that got "hacked", although I think they just took it all and ran. When it was up to about 1100$ a while ago.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
Hashrate doesn't matter. There isn't a linear increase between profits and hashrate as coins are smart and auto adjust to the network. Only way to get ahead of the curve is with better hardware (ASICs) or custom kernels. Both of which don't do anything when everyone is using them.
You very well could've been making more money back when Quark was CPU only, although it seems like CPU only coins always end up fodder for botnets.
bensam1231 , I don't have watt meter . I think it's a consumption of 120 watts . Voltage standard 1.193 .Don't increase the voltage . Just increase the TDP BIOS . See the screenshot ..
Do you have a watt meter? How much power is it using?
I wonder what info these tools like GPU-Z would report for my Cuckoo Cycle cuda miner,
but don't have easy access to a Windows system.
Could someone clone https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo,
build a size 2^32 cuda miner with
> cd src
> make cuda32
run it with
> time ./cuda32 -h 0 -n 7 -t 512
(takes about 80sec on a GTX980) and report on the info from GPU-Z?
For a simple introduction to Cuckoo Cycle, please check my recent blog post at
http://cryptorials.io/beyond-hashcash-proof-work-theres-mining-hashing/
I lost about 20 btc on an exchange that got "hacked", although I think they just took it all and ran. When it was up to about 1100$ a while ago.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.
I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.
Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.
Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
He is selling it? Last I heard it wasn't for sale. Although that would probably have something to do with the decline of L2V2.No, he doesn't like money. He wants to be the best.
, the challenge is by itself more entertaining than a potential money grab... (not sure that I see one either...) and clearly a good way to improve programming skill...so for the moment, I keep my options opened (still thinking miner with fee, but no time at the moment)
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
He is selling it? Last I heard it wasn't for sale. Although that would probably have something to do with the decline of L2V2.But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
lolwut !? yeah it's my fault... sure please spare me this kind of bullshit...
(if it was an attempt at motivating me to release it... it pretty much failed...
)TSIV has already reached 5,7MHASH.
Without opensourcing, someone else will make a faster kernal. It's just a matter of time.
Nah, If you have a 20% faster miner than everybody else, you build a BIG farm and ROI a 750ti-980ti card every day
And then you wait for the competition to wake up...
I think it would be good money to make a etherum miner for the 750ti. Such a coin. Such a profit.
You have $200k for such a endeavor? Something to consider is you're actually crowd funding your 'investment' in a farm when you distribute it to everyone. You're essentially taking a piece of everyones farm, which is impossible to build on your own and you don't have ROI costs. Nor do you lose money when your enhancements go to waste, for instance, 20% faster L2V2 still isn't making more then Quark right now.
-Faster lyra2v2
-Faster quark
-tiny speedups in all algos.
-Some bugfixes
1.5.68(sp-MOD) is available here: (17-sep-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock
-Faster quark
-tiny speedups in all algos.
-Some bugfixes
1.5.68(sp-MOD) is available here: (17-sep-2015)
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer/releases/
The sourcecode is available here:
https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer
Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock
The lyra defaults are not optimal.
on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
On 980 and 960 my best is 7. Plz test...on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
Also bear in mind that cuda only uses these number to produce a number of threads for each kernels. So if there are large discrepencies between the various kernel. you might run the full chain of algo on a number which can be rather different from the intensity you gave... meaning the reported hashrate (intensity/time) can be wrong...
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
He is selling it? Last I heard it wasn't for sale. Although that would probably have something to do with the decline of L2V2.But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
lolwut !? yeah it's my fault... sure please spare me this kind of bullshit...
(if it was an attempt at motivating me to release it... it pretty much failed...
)TSIV has already reached 5,7MHASH.
Without opensourcing, someone else will make a faster kernal. It's just a matter of time.
Nah, If you have a 20% faster miner than everybody else, you build a BIG farm and ROI a 750ti-980ti card every day
And then you wait for the competition to wake up...
I think it would be good money to make a etherum miner for the 750ti. Such a coin. Such a profit.
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
He is selling it? Last I heard it wasn't for sale. Although that would probably have something to do with the decline of L2V2.No, he doesn't like money. He wants to be the best.
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
He is selling it? Last I heard it wasn't for sale. Although that would probably have something to do with the decline of L2V2.
But Djm-34's private kernal is doing 6.2MHASH on the 750ti. That is why lyra2v2 is not profitable to mine...
lolwut !? yeah it's my fault... sure please spare me this kind of bullshit...
(if it was an attempt at motivating me to release it... it pretty much failed...
)You have the fastest kernal in the world. You are the best optimizer in the lyra2v2 algo for the 750ti.
TSIV has already reached 5,7MHASH.
Without opensourcing, someone else will make a faster kernal. It's just a matter of time.
Telling you guys, 2% miner fee and just release stuff like that... Then improve it a bit, release it again.
I use .67 A good result for the GTH 960.
Ps. I do not know how correctly sent to the creator of the beer, let it be income for the day. For _SP transaction ID
7d52b98dc6448bdfdcd64fafc3fffb20a2d641a8e867ac591878cdd4e2b298bc
Ps. I do not know how correctly sent to the creator of the beer, let it be income for the day. For _SP transaction ID
7d52b98dc6448bdfdcd64fafc3fffb20a2d641a8e867ac591878cdd4e2b298bc
Do you have a watt meter? How much power is it using?
I submitted bether defaults now.
I get5150KHASH on 1388Mhz core and 2700 MEM. (750ti 38W tdp)
the 970 is peaking at 9950KHASH
Corrected to around 5000 on a pool(benchmark is showing high numbers)
but high rejects on the pool (duplicate shares).
Will submit a fix.
fixed
building release 68
I get
the 970 is peaking at 9950KHASH
Corrected to around 5000 on a pool(benchmark is showing high numbers)
but high rejects on the pool (duplicate shares).
fixed
building release 68
The lyra defaults are not optimal.
on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
On 980 and 960 my best is 7. Plz test...on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
I don't have a 980 here. But you can also try to change the tbp:
Lyra2REv2.cu:
else if (strstr(props.name, "980"))
{
intensity = 256 * 256 * 7;
tpb = 7;
}
if your values are higher than 9 (950,960,970,980,980ti you need to increase the limit as well:
cuda_lyra2v2.cu:
#define TPB52 9
#define TPB50 16
The lyra defaults are not optimal.
on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
On 980 and 960 my best is 7. Plz test... on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
The lyra2v2 defaults are not optimal.
on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..
Will change it.
Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.
I have submitted fixes in the atomic conversions. Lyra2v2 should now be fine.
Works! Hashrate +100 kH on 980, +60 kH on 960! SP_ (and all ccminer devs) you made really great job. lyra2v2 hashing extremely fast on such small cards.
after couple hours of playing with configs i could reach:
after couple hours of playing with configs i could reach:
Code:
[2015-09-17 17:38:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5025 Temp= 50C Fan= 41%
crazy speed.Do you mind to share your config?
Jump to: