Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 940. (Read 2347664 times)

member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
Agree, Ethminer is still very lucrative although it looks like Nvidia hardware hit the memory controller limitation and can't go anywhere else, much like Cryptonote.

Look at lyra2v2. It's also a memory hard algorithm.

280x Sgminer opensource(200watt) 4MHASH
750ti Djm-34 (sp-mod) opensource (40watt) 5MHASH

It's like creating a etherum miner that does 35MHASH on the 750ti.

But the opensource is only doing 8MHASH...
(djm34 here...)
The main difference between the algo of ethereum and other mem hard algo, is that you can't rescale mem usage as it always requires the full dag file to run (ie 1.2Gb or so of vram with many random over the full dag file)
Meaning you can't really improve passed what has already been done... (yeah, I tried already  Grin ).

legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
asus strix gtx750ti @ 1402/5202
quark, default settings
R67 12h@nicehash 6.83mh / zero rejects
R68 12h@nicehash 6.79mh / 0.18mh rejects

Try 12 hours with the parameter -i 22.9

on our gigabyte 750ti oc lp cards -i 22.9 seems to be the best intensity and the best hashrate so far for quark ...

though thefarm is now back on x11 ...

#crysx
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
Geforce 840M (1200 gpu/1100 gddr3) quark: 3500kh/s, t=62C Smiley

he-he. The maxwell junior on the Laptop!!!

Hashing quark faster than sgminer on the 290x with the opensource kernal.
I updated my post a bit ))
quark made it to decrease gpu clock (PerfCap Reason: Pwr), but with neo and lyra there is a space left for o/c

Upd: I decided to let it throttle if it wants to and push it to the limit (1260/1180) and got 3650kh/s in quark)))
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
asus strix gtx750ti @ 1402/5202
quark, default settings
R67 12h@nicehash 6.83mh / zero rejects
R68 12h@nicehash 6.79mh / 0.18mh rejects

Try 12 hours with the parameter -i 22.9
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
bensam1231 , I don't have watt meter . I think it's a consumption of 120 watts . Voltage standard 1.193 .Don't increase the voltage . Just increase the TDP BIOS . See the screenshot ..


Hmmm... Every miner should have a watt meter. Buy one for $18 on Newegg (Don't get a Kill-A-Watt, they break like clockwork every month).

Voltage doesn't tell a whole lot or TDP as Manufacturers change it around.

I lost about 20 btc on an exchange that got "hacked", although I think they just took it all and ran. When it was up to about 1100$ a while ago.

I got mad and quit mining altogether, I just now got back in the game and this quark mining power on nvidia cards is insane. When I stopped mining it was still cpu only.

I get about 54mh/s with 2 980ti's mining quark, slightly overclocked and -C and -i 25.

Any one get any better results? I think this is a great number but I want the most I can possibly get, just like the rest of us.

Donation coming soon once I build up a little more coinage.

 Cool

Hashrate doesn't matter. There isn't a linear increase between profits and hashrate as coins are smart and auto adjust to the network. Only way to get ahead of the curve is with better hardware (ASICs) or custom kernels. Both of which don't do anything when everyone is using them.

You very well could've been making more money back when Quark was CPU only, although it seems like CPU only coins always end up fodder for botnets.

I understand the that the network adjusts to the hashrate, I only meant to point out that technology is a fast moving m f'r. And I love it.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Depends on your software but I think the mem is multiplied by 2. so 2700 in one software is 5400 in another.

I get 5MHASH with 1388/5400 (x86 windows)
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Quote

Try release 68, it should be faster on the 750ti. I use -X 10 as the default value. (Experimental intensity) 37,5% less gpu memory needed.

I get 5MHASH on 1388Mhz core and 2700 MEM. (750ti 38W tdp)
The 970 is peaking at 9950KHASH


just tested with 1388 core, but couldn't set 2700 mem, the lowerest what i can do - 5400(stock) - 2100= 3300 mem. everything which is lower - driver crash. seems like it depends on card.

but with 1388/3300 can reach only
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 4555 Temp= 50C Fan= 39%



but still without power consumption info.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Small donation SP_ after 15h mining in "fun mode"
72d7954e6d2086526ebb674ed5a789154beeac31e19b1e0430664575fa8fa96f
yep not much but better than nothing
P.S. already checked 1.5.68 release. yep a little bit faster on 750Ti.
in nearest two days will check power consumption on different core and memory, will post results.

Thanks. Smiley In 10 years they might be worth 1000$ a piece. :-)

If you have time, Run the miner with different x settings and check the power usage / hashrate.

-X 1
-X 2
-X 3
-X 4
.
.
.
.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
1.5.68(sp-MOD) is available here: (17-sep-2015)
Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock
Geforce 840M (1200 gpu/1100 gddr3) quark: 3500kh/s, t=62C Smiley

he-he. The maxwell junior on the Laptop!!!

Hashing quark faster than sgminer on the 290x with the opensource kernal.
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Small donation SP_ after 15h mining in "fun mode"

72d7954e6d2086526ebb674ed5a789154beeac31e19b1e0430664575fa8fa96f

yep not much but better than nothing

P.S. already checked 1.5.68 release. yep a little bit faster on 750Ti.
in nearest two days will check power consumption on different core and memory, will post results.
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
Agree, Ethminer is still very lucrative although it looks like Nvidia hardware hit the memory controller limitation and can't go anywhere else, much like Cryptonote.

Look at lyra2v2. It's also a memory hard algorithm.

280x Sgminer opensource(200watt) 4MHASH
750ti Djm-34 (sp-mod) opensource (40watt) 5MHASH

It's like creating a etherum miner that does 35MHASH on the 750ti.

But the opensource is only doing 8MHASH...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
SP_  (and all ccminer devs) you made really great job.  lyra2v2 hashing extremely fast on such small cards.
after couple hours of playing with configs  i could reach:
Code:
[2015-09-17 17:38:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5025 Temp= 50C Fan= 41%
crazy speed.
Do you mind to share your config?
everything is by default.
./ccminer -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp:// -u  -p -X 5
only overclocking. my card was mining on 1500 but after 5 mins i had a driver crash. on 1490 it's stable.
but i didn't play with Memory Transfer Rate. According to your messages with memory adjustments card won't mine faster, just less power consumption?

Try release 68, it should be faster on the 750ti. I use -X 10 as the default value. (Experimental intensity) 37,5% less gpu memory needed.

I get 5MHASH on 1388Mhz core and 2700 MEM. (750ti 38W tdp)
The 970 is peaking at 9950KHASH
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
SP_  (and all ccminer devs) you made really great job.  lyra2v2 hashing extremely fast on such small cards.
after couple hours of playing with configs  i could reach:

Code:
[2015-09-17 17:38:00] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 5025 Temp= 50C Fan= 41%
crazy speed.

Do you mind to share your config?

everything is by default.
./ccminer -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp:// -u  -p -X 5


only overclocking. my card was mining on 1500 but after 5 mins i had a driver crash. on 1490 it's stable.
but i didn't play with Memory Transfer Rate. According to your messages with memory adjustments card won't mine faster, just less power consumption?
legendary
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
1.5.68(sp-MOD) is available here: (17-sep-2015)


Post your stats here. Card name/gpu clock/memclock


Geforce 840M 2 mb gddr3 64 bit 384cu (laptop)  
  quark: (1200/1100) 3500kh/s, t=62C
  neoscrypt: (1250/1190) 92kh/s. t = 60C (memory bandw. limited)
  lyra2v2: (1250/1100) 2400kh/s, t=58C
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
Nah, If you have a 20% faster miner than everybody else, you build a BIG farm and ROI a 750ti-980ti card every day  Grin
And then you wait for the competition to wake up...
I think it would be good money to make a etherum miner for the 750ti. Such a coin. Such a profit.  Shocked
You have $200k for such a endeavor? Something to consider is you're actually crowd funding your 'investment' in a farm when you distribute it to everyone. You're essentially taking a piece of everyones farm, which is impossible to build on your own and you don't have ROI costs. Nor do you lose money when your enhancements go to waste, for instance, 20% faster L2V2 still isn't making more then Quark right now.

Not worth the risk.
I have a few rigs, and I keep buying some more slowly. With the low BTC price and high energy costs it's not worth it. But If I break even I still have alot of nice hardware to play with.
In order to make a living of making mining software you need to be able to optimize every algo 10-20% and do it before anybody else. Wolf0 is the only one I know who can do that.

Agree, Ethminer is still very lucrative although it looks like Nvidia hardware hit the memory controller limitation and can't go anywhere else, much like Cryptonote.

I would definitely argue you're talking about two completely different jobs. Mining is independent of developing miners, unless you have a company that encompasses both. You're splitting your firepower between the two. You could sell/lease the 10-20% lead for a piece of someone elses pie. I don't think you'll ever hit anywhere close to what the big miners are really doing, let alone when the majority of people use your software.

Taking 2% of everyone elses pie is worth more then trying to take 20% more with a fraction of the hashing power. For instance, 2% of 8GH is 160MH/s... And that's just the biggest miner, not everyone else. In order to make a bigger advantage then 2% of that one miner you would need a farm equivalent of 800MH/s or greater, but we aren't just talking about one miner here. Nicehash has 40Gh/s on Quark right now and that isn't all Quark miners everywhere.
legendary
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
Do you have a watt meter? How much power is it using?

I wonder what info these tools like GPU-Z would report for my Cuckoo Cycle cuda miner,
but don't have easy access to a Windows system.

Could someone  clone https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo,
build a size 2^32 cuda miner with
> cd src
> make cuda32
run it with
> time ./cuda32 -h 0 -n 7 -t 512

(takes about 80sec on a GTX980) and report on the info from GPU-Z?

For a simple introduction to Cuckoo Cycle, please check my recent blog post at

http://cryptorials.io/beyond-hashcash-proof-work-theres-mining-hashing/

That's an intereseting concept for PoW (I know I'm very late to it), but I don't see any coin using it and it's been around since 2014...

very interesting indeed ...

i would definitely look into that with granite ...

#crysx
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
The lyra defaults are not optimal.

on 750ti the default intensity is -X 16, but -X 5 -X 10 and -X15 are bether. -X 5 use less power too(less memory)..

Will change it.

Also the tpb hardcoded in the code needs to be adjusted. 980ti/980/960 probobly need totally different values.

On 980 and 960 my best is 7. Plz test...
what kind of hashrate are you getting with these numbers ?
Also bear in mind that cuda only uses these number to produce a number of threads for each kernels. So if there are large discrepencies between the various kernel. you might run the full chain of algo on a number which can be rather different from the intensity you gave... meaning the reported hashrate (intensity/time) can be wrong...  
980 - 11450 kH, 960 6050 kH. Can`t test 750Ti at this moment.
Clocks - 980 - 1390 MHz, 960 1440 MHz.
Whith tbp 9 hashrate is lower for me.
legendary
Activity: 2716
Merit: 1094
Black Belt Developer
Do you have a watt meter? How much power is it using?

I wonder what info these tools like GPU-Z would report for my Cuckoo Cycle cuda miner,
but don't have easy access to a Windows system.

Could someone  clone https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo,
build a size 2^32 cuda miner with
> cd src
> make cuda32
run it with
> time ./cuda32 -h 0 -n 7 -t 512

(takes about 80sec on a GTX980) and report on the info from GPU-Z?

For a simple introduction to Cuckoo Cycle, please check my recent blog post at

http://cryptorials.io/beyond-hashcash-proof-work-theres-mining-hashing/

That's an intereseting concept for PoW (I know I'm very late to it), but I don't see any coin using it and it's been around since 2014...
sp_
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
The biggest quark miner is:

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=12&addr=1GMy4ASNFDVdn3oLYsvgFX5H27Hx2v65Mv&l=0

The n labeled are NVIDIA GPU's, the R labeled are Radeon (AMD) The farm is running a profit switcher. Mostly x11 and quark, but sometimes lyra2v2 as well.

8GHASH of quark with the current prices is producing 3,2 BTC every day. ($752)  ($274 480 a year.)

Quark based coins have a total hashrate of around 200GHASH/s Per day. so this farm has a 4% market share.

80BTC worth of quark (clones) are being mined everyday. (Sharkcoin is the biggest)
X11 is bigger with Dash as the leading coin.

The #altcoins are back
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
So curious bone for you guys to pick away at... I was browsing pay addresses on Nicehash and was looking at the biggest Quark miner:

https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=miners&a=12&addr=1MPnrpSFBEvzDqpFpv2Fit4ktRVzkBVfdQ&l=1

How do you end up with workers producing 600MH/s? Only thing I can think of is these are nodes running on a cluster. I don't know why you would do something like this opposed to simply running separate workers on separate machines. There is no advantage of clustering the machines and only leads to more downtime due to miner crashes.

Edit: Nevermind, this is probably a proxy or a private multipool.
Jump to: