Author

Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 959. (Read 2347664 times)

member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
750Ti still seem like a really good choice imo.
I guess the prices will go down a bit also now when new cards show up ?
Me myself are buying used 750Ti:s for like 80 bucks.

All my 750Ti:s produce around 7.1-7.3Mhs @Quark superstable.

True.  But when you consider the fact that you can only fit so many cards in one box, looking at performance per card starts to be a bit more important.  One box with 6x 960 should be about the same (probably better) hash/watt as two boxes with 6x 750ti each, but with significantly lower upfront cost.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
750Ti still seem like a really good choice imo.
I guess the prices will go down a bit also now when new cards show up ?
Me myself are buying used 750Ti:s for like 80 bucks.

All my 750Ti:s produce around 7.1-7.3Mhs @Quark superstable.

I've spent the last week trying to get more out of my 6 x 750ti & all I can get is 6200 each and then its not 100% stable  Angry
Can I ask how are you getting 7000 out of yours?
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...
I've PR'd a fix.  If you can build yourself, you can pull down the branch at https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/whpx_segv
still segfaulting...
i also notice it segfaults with just the -h or -V flags too after printing out the infos and curiously it doesn't when started inside gdb (it starts hashing normally)
What's your command line?  I don't have a pool for that so only tested with -a whirlpoolx --benchmark.
I came across that other mess of crashes you mentioned.  Uninitialized globals galore!  See https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/sigh.  I'll PR it once I test build on Windows.
the same command line as you and replacing --benchmark with pool's url/user/pass flags doesn't make any difference...

sp_ merged the first fix. I've rebased the branch mentioned in my last post on top of it.  Give that a try, maybe I fixed it  by accident. Smiley

Mind linking me to the pool you're using?  Or if it's public/anon pool you can just PM me your credentials and I'll throw some hashes at you to test.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...
I've PR'd a fix.  If you can build yourself, you can pull down the branch at https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/whpx_segv
still segfaulting...
i also notice it segfaults with just the -h or -V flags too after printing out the infos and curiously it doesn't when started inside gdb (it starts hashing normally)
What's your command line?  I don't have a pool for that so only tested with -a whirlpoolx --benchmark.
I came across that other mess of crashes you mentioned.  Uninitialized globals galore!  See https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/sigh.  I'll PR it once I test build on Windows.
the same command line as you and replacing --benchmark with pool's url/user/pass flags doesn't make any difference...
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...
I've PR'd a fix.  If you can build yourself, you can pull down the branch at https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/whpx_segv
still segfaulting...
i also notice it segfaults with just the -h or -V flags too after printing out the infos and curiously it doesn't when started inside gdb (it starts hashing normally)

What's your command line?  I don't have a pool for that so only tested with -a whirlpoolx --benchmark.

I came across that other mess of crashes you mentioned.  Uninitialized globals galore!  See https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/sigh.  I'll PR it once I test build on Windows.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...
I've PR'd a fix.  If you can build yourself, you can pull down the branch at https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/whpx_segv
still segfaulting...
i also notice it segfaults even with the -h or -V flags too after printing out the infos and curiously it doesn't when started inside gdb (it starts hashing normally)
hero member
Activity: 687
Merit: 502
750Ti still seem like a really good choice imo.
I guess the prices will go down a bit also now when new cards show up ?
Me myself are buying used 750Ti:s for like 80 bucks.

All my 750Ti:s produce around 7.1-7.3Mhs @Quark superstable.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
I think its good replacement for 750ti...

It seems that compared to the 750ti, 950 and 960 scale +/-10% at around 133% and 200% respectively when you consider price, power and performance together.  Price and power (and that goofy ass memory interface on the 970) start to discourage the higher-end cards.
member
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...

I've PR'd a fix.  If you can build yourself, you can pull down the branch at https://github.com/t-nelson/ccminer/tree/whpx_segv
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...
At how many watts plz.

Cant say for sure , but TDP is showing range about 78-80 %
Ok thz

The MSIs card has huge OC capabilities. I think its good replacement for 750ti...
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...
At how many watts plz.

Cant say for sure , but TDP is showing range about 78-80 %
Ok thz
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...
At how many watts plz.

Cant say for sure , but TDP is showing range about 78-80 %
legendary
Activity: 3164
Merit: 1003
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...
At how many watts plz.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...

That is really good, which version to use? THX.

r.65 - the last
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...

That is really good, which version to use? THX.
sr. member
Activity: 329
Merit: 250
master's whirlpoolx seems broken, it segfaults under linux...
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

Yesterday I've been testing one of these  babies. It reaches 8.77MH on quark with overclock...
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin

optimizations are base specific(i mean compute 5.2 or 5.0)not card specific
full member
Activity: 173
Merit: 100
Optimization anything about GTX950? I have three cards in wait. Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1024
GIMP ON YIIMP--

For the last couple hours I mined MUE coin (Monetary Unit) on YiiMP (yiimp.ccminer.org).  MUE is a quark algorithm coin, and according to CoinWarz, currently capable of producing ~200-400 dollars a day in mining revenue.  There must be a decimal place or two missing in the calculation!  Smiley  I mined over 1000 MUE in the space of time that I spent on YiiMP, but they are currenly worth about 15 satoshis each.  I will be earning about .00015 BTC on the exchange when my MUE coins mature, I think.  Not so sure!  Smiley

Every block that I hit, I got all the coins save the pool share. Somehow, CoinWarz led me to believe that I'd be earning 100X more, at least.  I solved ~40 blocks at 40 MUE coins per block.  Because YiiMP is more or less a hobby/experimental pool, it was as if I was solomining.  There was no other miner to share the blocks with me, just the 1% pool share to deduct.

If I could only find the right coin...

--scryptr

Volume bro... Mining a dead coin. More hashrate you have, the bigger coins you have to mine. Putting aside volume, large amounts of hashrate instantly destroy the difficulty on small coins making them pointless to mine.
Jump to: