Topic: CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded NVIDIA Maxwell / Pascal kernels. - page 989. (Read 2347601 times)
i see quark algo payments have perked up a bit on nicehash. but for me, it has to be above 0.4 to be worth it to mine.
Don't think of it as thread jacking. Instead think of it as an exchange. The more people talk about a coin and show interest then the more likely an exchange might add it.
Maybe sp_ was unaware of that other coin. If enough people show interest in that also maybe a dev might show interest and pick it up.
I am pretty sure they don't spend all day scouring the forums for new things that are out.
An Exchange... Sounds good to me.
I was not insinuating djm was hijacking because i am pretty sure he/she works well with sp to develop this.. I was just thinking out loud is all.
)... so to make sure every releases use the same setting.... Don't think of it as thread jacking. Instead think of it as an exchange. The more people talk about a coin and show interest then the more likely an exchange might add it.
Maybe sp_ was unaware of that other coin. If enough people show interest in that also maybe a dev might show interest and pick it up.
I am pretty sure they don't spend all day scouring the forums for new things that are out.
An Exchange... Sounds good to me.
I was not insinuating djm was hijacking because i am pretty sure he/she works well with sp to develop this.. I was just thinking out loud is all.
DIFFICULTY MULTIPLIER--
Have you been reading in the thread? The difficulty multiplier "--diff 2" or "--diff 0.5" may need to be set, depending on precisely which version of ccminer you are using.
Basicially, there is a hard-coded difficulty value in the ccminer code. If that value does not match the value set in the POOL's code, then the MINER needs to adjust his ccminer with the proper "-diff" value for agreement with hashing values at the pool, and locally. --scryptr
I was under the impression that was fixed with rel_60 I must have gotten it confused with djm version sorry for getting so uptight..
sometimes this thead seems like its being hijacked and I am reading info for one ccminer and applying it to another. I seriously have dyslexia so it takes me some time to figure it out
The thread can certainly get confusing (by the way you can't mine ETH with sp_'s ccminer, given that recent thread jacking
). Don't think of it as thread jacking. Instead think of it as an exchange. The more people talk about a coin and show interest then the more likely an exchange might add it.
Maybe sp_ was unaware of that other coin. If enough people show interest in that also maybe a dev might show interest and pick it up.
I am pretty sure they don't spend all day scouring the forums for new things that are out.
DIFFICULTY MULTIPLIER--
Have you been reading in the thread? The difficulty multiplier "--diff 2" or "--diff 0.5" may need to be set, depending on precisely which version of ccminer you are using.
Basicially, there is a hard-coded difficulty value in the ccminer code. If that value does not match the value set in the POOL's code, then the MINER needs to adjust his ccminer with the proper "-diff" value for agreement with hashing values at the pool, and locally. --scryptr
I was under the impression that was fixed with rel_60 I must have gotten it confused with djm version sorry for getting so uptight..
sometimes this thead seems like its being hijacked and I am reading info for one ccminer and applying it to another. I seriously have dyslexia so it takes me some time to figure it out
The thread can certainly get confusing (by the way you can't mine ETH with sp_'s ccminer, given that recent thread jacking
). @_sp i'm not mining directly to you're adress atm, but will continue when the vtc/eth hype is over
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two really appreciate it!
@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two
really appreciate it!@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
thanks very much! :-)
I see that nvidia miners don't want to end up like AMD with huge speed gap between public and private miners ;-)
As a Ex AMD miner that is something I never want to experience again.
DIFFICULTY MULTIPLIER--
Have you been reading in the thread? The difficulty multiplier "--diff 2" or "--diff 0.5" may need to be set, depending on precisely which version of ccminer you are using.
Basicially, there is a hard-coded difficulty value in the ccminer code. If that value does not match the value set in the POOL's code, then the MINER needs to adjust his ccminer with the proper "-diff" value for agreement with hashing values at the pool, and locally. --scryptr
I was under the impression that was fixed with rel_60 I must have gotten it confused with djm version sorry for getting so uptight..
sometimes this thead seems like its being hijacked and I am reading info for one ccminer and applying it to another. I seriously have dyslexia so it takes me some time to figure it out
SORRY--
Didn't mean to sound cruel. I don't know which version will be which right now. I mine with SP_ release dot 60, and not an incremental build. I have to use "--diff 2" at NiceHash. But, mining straight VTC is better value just now, so I mine at GMC. --scryptr
well I adjusted it and now nicehash web frontend is down.. so I waits
DIFFICULTY MULTIPLIER--
Have you been reading in the thread? The difficulty multiplier "--diff 2" or "--diff 0.5" may need to be set, depending on precisely which version of ccminer you are using.
Basicially, there is a hard-coded difficulty value in the ccminer code. If that value does not match the value set in the POOL's code, then the MINER needs to adjust his ccminer with the proper "-diff" value for agreement with hashing values at the pool, and locally. --scryptr
I was under the impression that was fixed with rel_60 I must have gotten it confused with djm version sorry for getting so uptight..
sometimes this thead seems like its being hijacked and I am reading info for one ccminer and applying it to another. I seriously have dyslexia so it takes me some time to figure it out
so I am trying to mine lyra2v2 at nicehash
ccminer is reporting
[2015-08-18 09:52:20] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11335
[2015-08-18 09:52:21] accepted: 171/171 (100.00%), 22814 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11394
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] accepted: 172/172 (100.00%), 22815 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11370
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] accepted: 173/173 (100.00%), 22813 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11428
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] accepted: 174/174 (100.00%), 22817 kH/s yes!
but Nicehash only credits me for
5 minute accepted speed MH/s 11.1850
is there anything I can do on my end to make these figures match.
I considered a different pool but then with pool fees, transfer fees and exchange fees it doesn't seem worth the trouble. (I am probably doing it wrong but such is life)
ccminer is reporting
[2015-08-18 09:52:20] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11335
[2015-08-18 09:52:21] accepted: 171/171 (100.00%), 22814 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11394
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] accepted: 172/172 (100.00%), 22815 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11370
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] accepted: 173/173 (100.00%), 22813 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11428
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] accepted: 174/174 (100.00%), 22817 kH/s yes!
but Nicehash only credits me for
5 minute accepted speed MH/s 11.1850
is there anything I can do on my end to make these figures match.
I considered a different pool but then with pool fees, transfer fees and exchange fees it doesn't seem worth the trouble. (I am probably doing it wrong but such is life)
DIFFICULTY MULTIPLIER--
Have you been reading in the thread? The difficulty multiplier "--diff 2" or "--diff 0.5" may need to be set, depending on precisely which version of ccminer you are using.
Basicially, there is a hard-coded difficulty value in the ccminer code. If that value does not match the value set in the POOL's code, then the MINER needs to adjust his ccminer with the proper "-diff" value for agreement with hashing values at the pool, and locally. --scryptr
so I am trying to mine lyra2v2 at nicehash
ccminer is reporting
[2015-08-18 09:52:20] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11335
[2015-08-18 09:52:21] accepted: 171/171 (100.00%), 22814 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11394
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] accepted: 172/172 (100.00%), 22815 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11370
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] accepted: 173/173 (100.00%), 22813 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11428
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] accepted: 174/174 (100.00%), 22817 kH/s yes!
but Nicehash only credits me for
5 minute accepted speed MH/s 11.1850
is there anything I can do on my end to make these figures match.
I considered a different pool but then with pool fees, transfer fees and exchange fees it doesn't seem worth the trouble. (I am probably doing it wrong but such is life)
ccminer is reporting
[2015-08-18 09:52:20] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11335
[2015-08-18 09:52:21] accepted: 171/171 (100.00%), 22814 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11394
[2015-08-18 09:52:27] accepted: 172/172 (100.00%), 22815 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11370
[2015-08-18 09:52:37] accepted: 173/173 (100.00%), 22813 kH/s yes!
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] GPU #1: GeForce GTX 980, 11428
[2015-08-18 09:52:39] accepted: 174/174 (100.00%), 22817 kH/s yes!
but Nicehash only credits me for
5 minute accepted speed MH/s 11.1850
is there anything I can do on my end to make these figures match.
I considered a different pool but then with pool fees, transfer fees and exchange fees it doesn't seem worth the trouble. (I am probably doing it wrong but such is life)
New ETH pool in alpha phase, if anyone is interested.
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5374-pooleum-a-new-ethereum-pool-in-pre-alpha-phase/
http://cryptomining-blog.com/5374-pooleum-a-new-ethereum-pool-in-pre-alpha-phase/
@_sp i'm not mining directly to you're adress atm, but will continue when the vtc/eth hype is over
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two really appreciate it!
@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two
really appreciate it!@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
thanks very much! :-)
I see that nvidia miners don't want to end up like AMD with huge speed gap between public and private miners ;-)
yes, but it will be faster with a small rewrite.
Seperate the loops into two(keccakfirst,. keccak last) and remove all the constant work (less instructions),
With the #pragma unroll and __forceinline__ I hoped that the the compiler would remove the constant work but it doesn't understand that rol(constant,constant) etc can be precalculated.. Tune, compile and study the ptx assembly code. Less instructions is normally bether..
Load from memory differenty(remove the uint2 cast) use maxwells vector instuctions, play with the pragma unrolls(but make sure that you don't exceed the instructioncache), alter the launch bounds to tune the registers etc..
Seperate the loops into two(keccakfirst,. keccak last) and remove all the constant work (less instructions),
With the #pragma unroll and __forceinline__ I hoped that the the compiler would remove the constant work but it doesn't understand that rol(constant,constant) etc can be precalculated.. Tune, compile and study the ptx assembly code. Less instructions is normally bether..
Load from memory differenty(remove the uint2 cast) use maxwells vector instuctions, play with the pragma unrolls(but make sure that you don't exceed the instructioncache), alter the launch bounds to tune the registers etc..
It will probably be a little faster on its own, but I think the kernel is currently bottleneck by the memory lookups.
I tried making the whole keccak/dagger state uint2 based to get rid of casting, split out the keccak functions, manually unrolled some parts to get rid of branches, removed a bunch or XORs because they were unneeded..no improvement at all. As far as I could see there are no ROL2(const, const) here..
It's in the cudaminer-sp branch if you want to look.
Today's share sent 
djm34: 7f3ffa68047d03032fdfda9c4e0dacabec8abd943c7c7530f23d0ef4047386d5
pallas: 1a5a6cfafa6a4a52c8350895c406826a4004c8f9763a15776bb922c02f55fbe8
sp_: 03f50081ae4b1a55bf1af84460169254ab6d130a0a6785de464e2b197a737262
I gave myself a 80% donation
djm34: 7f3ffa68047d03032fdfda9c4e0dacabec8abd943c7c7530f23d0ef4047386d5
pallas: 1a5a6cfafa6a4a52c8350895c406826a4004c8f9763a15776bb922c02f55fbe8
sp_: 03f50081ae4b1a55bf1af84460169254ab6d130a0a6785de464e2b197a737262
I gave myself a 80% donation
@_sp i'm not mining directly to you're adress atm, but will continue when the vtc/eth hype is over
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two really appreciate it!
@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
thanks a lot at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two
really appreciate it!@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
@_sp i'm not mining directly to you're adress atm, but will continue when the vtc/eth hype is over
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two really appreciate it!
@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
at all devs, what you do for this community is mind blowing, so you definitely deserve a beer or two
really appreciate it!@ djm34: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ _sp: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
@ pallas: .05 btc https://blockchain.info/en/tx/9a1522198e383355e5128a9c41eef8f4c3f40d35c61f234defa5ed81f3cc45bd
thank you guys again!
@djm34 ......Sent you some beers for your Lyra2v2.v4....or is it a 6 pack. .05btc
TrxID: cdd1ad95ace6de79024b50863a51743c0cead3125c09cda59ea09802176ea90c
4.6 mh 750ti oc 1350.
I forgot to add .... 2x 750ti's on my vista doing quark algo drawing 212 watts at the wall... lyra2v2 v4 196 watts at the wall. So 8 watts less per 750ti doing lyra2v2 v4. .05btcTrxID: cdd1ad95ace6de79024b50863a51743c0cead3125c09cda59ea09802176ea90c
4.6 mh 750ti oc 1350.
Down loading v5 now.
Anybody have the 980ti implemented yet? I don't have mine on the new rig yet, but just wondering.
Thx
Thx
hashing with nvidia always powerful. to the best of my choosing mining GPU Graphic card Nvida
Jump to: