Pages:
Author

Topic: Centralization Will Bring Down Bitcoin - page 2. (Read 11173 times)

legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1001
All cryptos are FIAT digital currency. Do not use.
Has anyone thought of creating a universal crypto wallet client that does the exchange rate for you ?.

Yup Chaoskampf. Its time for the dragon to eat it's tail.

pEACe
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
I love the idea of a totally decentralized exchange like this.  But I see one legal problem with it: if the government sees this going on and realizes what is happening, it's likely going to treat it as money laundering.  I don't see any way this can happen and actually be thought of as legal by the US government.  Would it be harder to target than an exchange?  Absolutely, but by no means impossible.

Insert your favorite talking head's voice here:

"Breaking news people. You don't want to miss this....A large group of 'crypto-currency' fanatics have had billions of dollars seized by authorities. Experts say these individual's facilitated transactions between criminals dealing in child pornography, identity theft, illegal narcotics, counterfeit money, money laundering, and may have played a role in the terrorist attacks of (insert date here). It took 18 months and almost 1 billion dollars in tax payers' money to catch these cagey cyber-crooks, but the effort has paid off in a big way! (cuts to many guys being arrested for doing nothing more than being the 'b' - see below. The spin makes them look like KPers or meth dealers.)  This was the largest money seizure of it's kind anywhere in the world. Stay tuned for more details on this exciting report by Trisha Takanowa."

I like the idea of the circle of trust. I don't like the idea of spending time in Gitmo for doing nothing more than being the the 'b' in a->b->c. When will we realize, as a society, that 'b' has NOTHING to do with the ultimate outcome? It's going to happen either way.

These must be stepping stones toward a world where we don't have to worry about Fiat at all. The only reason this is necessary is because not everyone has Bitcoins. Not everyone has a business accepting Bitcoins. Not everyone has friends they can buy Bitcoins from. To truly establish the crypto-economy (it's already happening, just slower than it needs to), we need to first extract as much capital out of the old economy as possible.

pwi
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
I love the idea of a totally decentralized exchange like this.  But I see one legal problem with it: if the government sees this going on and realizes what is happening, it's likely going to treat it as money laundering.  I don't see any way this can happen and actually be thought of as legal by the US government.  Would it be harder to target than an exchange?  Absolutely, but by no means impossible.

Insert your favorite talking head's voice here:

"Breaking news people. You don't want to miss this....A large group of 'crypto-currency' fanatics have had billions of dollars seized by authorities. Experts say these individual's facilitated transactions between criminals dealing in child pornography, identity theft, illegal narcotics, counterfeit money, money laundering, and may have played a role in the terrorist attacks of (insert date here). It took 18 months and almost 1 billion dollars in tax payers' money to catch these cagey cyber-crooks, but the effort has paid off in a big way! (cuts to many guys being arrested for doing nothing more than being the 'b' - see below. The spin makes them look like KPers or meth dealers.)  This was the largest money seizure of it's kind anywhere in the world. Stay tuned for more details on this exciting report by Trisha Takanowa."

I like the idea of the circle of trust. I don't like the idea of spending time in Gitmo for doing nothing more than being the the 'b' in a->b->c. When will we realize, as a society, that 'b' has NOTHING to do with the ultimate outcome? It's going to happen either way.
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
I haven't fully read the OP, going to go more into it later when my head is clear.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-coin-open-exchange-idea-208945

Check out my idea there, want to create a blockchain for IOUs.  Basically ripple but open source, that way people can exchange currencies with a trust based system.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
I love the idea of a totally decentralized exchange like this.  But I see one legal problem with it: if the government sees this going on and realizes what is happening, it's likely going to treat it as money laundering.  I don't see any way this can happen and actually be thought of as legal by the US government.  Would it be harder to target than an exchange?  Absolutely, but by no means impossible.

They wouldn't be able to see that those accounts are linked into a large network, because the underlying program would be invisible. After a very long time they might notice patterns emerge, since transfers are being made to nodes on a semi-regular basis, but on the surface it would just appear as a small account with a few thousand dollars sending out a few hundred dollars to other small accounts at very irregular time intervals. Also, they already consider Bitcoin itself as a money laundering vehicle, so it's too late to worry about that.

Yep, true, I'm sure they already consider bitcoin a money laundering vehicle.  But so far they're only targeting the exchanges, not the users.  That would change with this system.  I could be wrong, but me, personally?  I'd rather them target the exchanges than the users.  Let someone else have the legal burden of bitcoin.  (Assuming you're not in fact operating an exchange yourself, in which case, you would be that someone else.)
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
I have a better idea: Start a buttonwood in your local area.

Advertise it on Craigslist (yes, I've seen bitcoin ads on Craigslist), localbitcoins, meetups section of forum, other forum, Facebook, etc.

Show up each week and wait.

 Cool

Worst case scenario, you get extra time to read books or check email.

Best case, you get a free exchange and place to trade bitcoins for cash and vice versa.

Not only cash! If you live in an interesting, diverse, and somewhat popular area, you can have people selling turnips for bitcoins, or gold/silver, or goods/services. You never know what kind of monster you can create...

How would I get $500,000 worth of Bitcoin at a buttonwood? How bout a million?

sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
I have a better idea: Start a buttonwood in your local area.

Advertise it on Craigslist (yes, I've seen bitcoin ads on Craigslist), localbitcoins, meetups section of forum, other forum, Facebook, etc.

Show up each week and wait.

 Cool

Worst case scenario, you get extra time to read books or check email.

Best case, you get a free exchange and place to trade bitcoins for cash and vice versa.

Not only cash! If you live in an interesting, diverse, and somewhat popular area, you can have people selling turnips for bitcoins, or gold/silver, or goods/services. You never know what kind of monster you can create...
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
MY FACE EXACTLY Shocked

As in, you're interested? Or you're amazed that anyone would consider this?

member
Activity: 97
Merit: 10
One American Sumbitch Which Love 8
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
I love the idea of a totally decentralized exchange like this.  But I see one legal problem with it: if the government sees this going on and realizes what is happening, it's likely going to treat it as money laundering.  I don't see any way this can happen and actually be thought of as legal by the US government.  Would it be harder to target than an exchange?  Absolutely, but by no means impossible.

They wouldn't be able to see that those accounts are linked into a large network, because the underlying program would be invisible. After a very long time they might notice patterns emerge, since transfers are being made to nodes on a semi-regular basis, but on the surface it would just appear as a small account with a few thousand dollars sending out a few hundred dollars to other small accounts at very irregular time intervals. Also, they already consider Bitcoin itself as a money laundering vehicle, so it's too late to worry about that.

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
I love the idea of a totally decentralized exchange like this.  But I see one legal problem with it: if the government sees this going on and realizes what is happening, it's likely going to treat it as money laundering.  I don't see any way this can happen and actually be thought of as legal by the US government.  Would it be harder to target than an exchange?  Absolutely, but by no means impossible.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
What I don't understand is why no one is trying to create Satoshi's suggestion regarding this matter...... sigh... maybe one day after I finish the projects at hand.

What exactly was his recommendation?

full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
If no centralization like Mt Gox, How can we know what our bitcoins can buy?

You could ask your neighbor how much they would take for a bitcoin. Since bitcoin is still in beta, you will be doing him or her a favor by just mentioning it to them.


A "price" is simply a measure of how much someone values a good. If I can find someone willing to pay $500 a Bitcoin, then that's the price of Bitcoin, regardless of what's happening on some Japanese website.

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
If no centralization like Mt Gox, How can we know what our bitcoins can buy?

You could ask your neighbor how much they would take for a bitcoin. Since bitcoin is still in beta, you will be doing him or her a favor by just mentioning it to them.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
order in numbers
P2P is the way to go, turn the exchanges into a Hydra with a million heads that can't all be cut off.

Have the client handle their own buy/sell info and distribute the load of a virtual exchange via VPN.

Make the entire network a single virtual trading floor where everyone can digitally "shout out" their order.



Exactly. Easier said than done, obviously, but this is the only way that I can imagine Bitcoin progressing to the next level of legitimacy.

sr. member
Activity: 359
Merit: 250
I dont want to scan my national id and bills and send them to mtgox. Where is the privacy?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
P2P is the way to go, turn the exchanges into a Hydra with a million heads that can't all be cut off.

Have the client handle their own buy/sell info and distribute the load of a virtual exchange via VPN.

Make the entire network a single virtual trading floor where everyone can digitally "shout out" their order.

sr. member
Activity: 309
Merit: 250
Because regulation, licenses , etc aren't cheap.

Yes, that's exactly why we will never have 100 competing legit exchanges. Just think of stocks, bonds, even forex. You cannot simply open another exchange while being 100% transparent and legally secure. That's exactly the reason why there is so small competition to Gox even taking into account huge profit margin one can have. Thus no number of ordinary exchanges will replace a good p2p exchange.
vip
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1043
👻
They are anything but decentralized, therein lies the problem. MTGox is only a problem because it was one first exchanges, naturally without a lot of other options they carried 80% of trade, which makes it dangerous to the market as a whole. This is changing with more exchanges starting to come online.

We need a true p2p exchange platform to truly decentralize it. Though Gox and others are still necessary as intermediaries from coin to fiat currency.

You are barking the wrong tree.  MTGOX isn't the problem.  The problem is why aren't there other options.   What happen to all the other exchanges that come and go?   Why can't they run a viable business to attract and keep their customer.

No matter how you design your P2P platform, the exit point is going to be an exchange of some sort for you to convert crypto to fiat and vice versa.     

If the exit node is badly run, they will still not get sufficient participation.  Either they run out of cash to buy your crypto currency, or they run out crypto currency to sell to the user, or in worst case scenario, they go rogue and run away with your money.
Because regulation, licenses , etc aren't cheap.
full member
Activity: 232
Merit: 100
They are anything but decentralized, therein lies the problem. MTGox is only a problem because it was one first exchanges, naturally without a lot of other options they carried 80% of trade, which makes it dangerous to the market as a whole. This is changing with more exchanges starting to come online.

We need a true p2p exchange platform to truly decentralize it. Though Gox and others are still necessary as intermediaries from coin to fiat currency.

You are barking the wrong tree.  MTGOX isn't the problem.  The problem is why aren't there other options.   What happen to all the other exchanges that come and go?   Why can't they run a viable business to attract and keep their customer.

No matter how you design your P2P platform, the exit point is going to be an exchange of some sort for you to convert crypto to fiat and vice versa.     

If the exit node is badly run, they will still not get sufficient participation.  Either they run out of cash to buy your crypto currency, or they run out crypto currency to sell to the user, or in worst case scenario, they go rogue and run away with your money.


 

Pages:
Jump to: