If he had 500k bitcoins, 7% of that is 35K bitcoins ~$350K. Want to explain how he is going to pay that out EVERY WEEK? You're hilariously stupid, or you're just trolling, which is whatever. If you're not trolling, care to justify your position in any way?
That is the wrong quesiton to ask. It likely can't be answered and that is what the investors hang their hat onto.
The correct question is WHY? Why would he keep paying out 7% every week on hundreds of thousands of coins?
For the sake of argument let say this is a real biz (legit or otherwise) which throws off real profits of >7% per week, and happens to need 500K BTC. Pirate has a great idea but no money so he does what plenty of other business men do... he borrows. Implausible but certainly possible. However he is the one taking the risk (especially if not using an alias, running a ponzi and planning to run off with the coinz). People losing $5M tend to do implusive things. So a sane business man taking that kind of risk would want a solid reward. High risk, high reward and that means a solid cut of the profit. I doubt his "business" is making 8% gross and he is paying out 7% taking all the risk. Say he is making 14% gross, needs to borrow 500K and is willing to give away half of that to get the operation off the ground. A stretch but certainly possible.
So yes a business could be making that kind of profit, and could be paying out massive amounts of interest, and could need 500K BTC BUT:
Nobody, not a criminal, not a scumbag, not a oil tycoon would voluntarily pay 7% interest on a principal he can pay down.Like any businessman (legit or otherwise) he would plough his portions of the profits into repaying the principal and thus week after week get a larger and larger share of the profits. At 15% gross, 7% interest in 10 weeks he would have the full 500K (all his profit), 0 BTC in debt, and still have the mythical 15% per week of future profits. Win-win-win.
The only reason to not pay down a multi-million dollar debt with the juice running at 3,400% APR is ___________.
(The "investors" simply never filled in the blank)