Pages:
Author

Topic: Change Of KYC Pattern - page 11. (Read 18862 times)

hero member
Activity: 2212
Merit: 805
Top Crypto Casino
February 13, 2019, 05:34:41 PM
#40
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?

That would be a welcome development. With an ever changing space like Crypto especially since financial refulators is are looking to getting involved with Crypto, such development would be welcome by ~ almost all Crypto users who take part in bounty programs. No one is saying there shouldn't be KYC but It should be done before the start of a campaign so one knows his or her stance before taking part in a campaign. Enough said. Nice suggestion Smiley
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
February 13, 2019, 05:30:09 PM
#39
It's a great idea starting kyc before or at the onset of the bounty because in many cases people fail to pass kyc because of the documents required and they end up losing the pay for the whole work they put in.
member
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
February 13, 2019, 04:43:32 PM
#38
I think that you are saying quite reasonable things, it would naturally be much more logical if the verification procedure were to take place before the bounty process begins, however many projects deliberately leave it on the last day - in order to deceive as many people as possible.
legendary
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 13, 2019, 04:13:27 PM
#37
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?

I'm fully agree with you. It's the best and the only one fair decision bounty campaigns can make. All the time when I face with KYC request for bounty hunters after the campaign I go on a rampage. Why the heck they don't tell it before the campaign? F*cking bastards Angry
jr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 1
February 13, 2019, 03:27:33 PM
#36
I increasingly encounter projects that immediately indicate at the beginning of a campaign whether a KYC verification is required or not. And I try to participate in such projects. I'm also one of those who consider KYC as optional for hunters. But, unfortunately, today are the such rules.
copper member
Activity: 448
Merit: 0
StableDex | Decentralized, Secure & Cost Effective
February 13, 2019, 03:23:01 PM
#35
I don't even like the kyc of a thing cos the crypto is a decentralized technology which need to authority from anyone before it can get operated or do it work, I see kyc announcement after bounty end as a way to scam hunters and nothing more cos if it were stated at start many would have withdraw and those who can submit required details will stay.
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 515
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino
February 13, 2019, 03:18:10 PM
#34
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?
Agree with it,so how many of the bounty hunters are ready to stop participating on the bounties who don't have clear rule about KYC at the time of joining on the bounty campaign?
member
Activity: 560
Merit: 16
February 13, 2019, 03:14:20 PM
#33
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?
Here on the forum it has been discussed many times already, but it has not brought any results. Each project does what it wants, because there are no generally accepted rules for bountyhunters. If our community is not able to work out and defend such rules that would suit us, then we will simply obey the rules that are imposed on us by our employers
copper member
Activity: 238
Merit: 0
February 13, 2019, 03:07:18 PM
#32
I agree that it would be nice if the team members could announce a KYC before the start of any bounty programme. But in each bounty you take part in, you are accepting the rules and it is stated that teams can change the rules whenever they want to.
jr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 1
February 13, 2019, 11:42:52 AM
#31
Some Bounty projects do look annoying because they change the rules at will. When at the beginning of the campaign they said that there was no KYC. But after the project was completed and the participants were told to complete KYC. And this is certainly very disappointing because KYC should be announced at the start of the campaign.
full member
Activity: 574
Merit: 139
February 13, 2019, 11:37:30 AM
#30
Bounties should be kyc free. I don't know why is important to collect personal data from bounty hunters. Bounty hunters are not investors neither they invest money which is the main reason why we have kyc, to see from where is money coming from. Receiving worthless tokens which are not money, i don't think kyc is needed here.
legendary
Activity: 3010
Merit: 1028
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 13, 2019, 11:28:46 AM
#29
KYC is so risky for a bounty because if the project were failed, your identity can be used for other uses to enterprise the developer.
That is why it is highly recommended to choose only high quality project which usually considered as legit.
Most of the time people are getting lured with the huge reward when in reality the project exist only to cater people's data.
jr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 4
February 13, 2019, 11:20:18 AM
#28
Yes. That's actually the best way to pass a kyc and I see that some projects are already doing that recently not unlike the suddenly announced ones at the closing end of the bounty, not knowing if some people really have what it takes to pass the kyc.
member
Activity: 546
Merit: 10
February 13, 2019, 11:11:52 AM
#27
If you are talking about using KYC at all, then I don’t think it’s necessary to change something. There are no guarantees that people will respond positively to this process in spite of the changes. The question of data storage.
jr. member
Activity: 262
Merit: 2
February 12, 2019, 11:04:42 AM
#26
That is just the best way, but you barely see them doing it that way because only few people will participate and if they want more people they will have to accept any form of identity unlike when required for at the end of a campaign where you will have to use your passport.
member
Activity: 616
Merit: 11
TRADE WITH NEGATIVE FEES
February 12, 2019, 03:48:52 AM
#25
We can’t force the campaign manager or the founder of the project if they want a KYC before conducting a bounty campaign. KYC helps also in eliminating this alt accounts keep on abusing the forum.
hero member
Activity: 2128
Merit: 520
February 10, 2019, 10:53:57 PM
#24
Good idea, and bounty managers need to accept only those who are willing to take part and send the requirements that needed, both will not waste time as bounty hunters who didn't want to take part will move on and try to work other campaign while the managers will only pick and pay those who continue and work for them, after the ico was ended there's no additional requirements to add but to simply pay those participants who contribute and did their part to advertise the project.
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1155
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 10, 2019, 10:51:30 PM
#23
There have been so much issues arising from bounty hunters doing kyc. So many bounty hunters are against it. Also looking at what kyc means, it means know your customer and bounty hunters are not customers.

So my thought is this: if there must be kyc , it should be done before the start of the bounty. If you pass the kyc, you start the bounty but if you fail, you just leave it and look for some other promising bounty.

What do you think about this?
I think some project already do that, they announce if people should do KYC first in their website and then can join bounty campaign. But it usually for project that consist of market or something that related to payment.
jr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 1
February 10, 2019, 10:45:41 PM
#22
KYC is so risky for a bounty because if the project were failed, your identity can be used for other uses to enterprise the developer.
full member
Activity: 795
Merit: 108
February 10, 2019, 10:41:40 PM
#21
This is indeed the right way so we can continue what steps we must take after giving our data, but in the form of a different format with investors, and that must be considered by the bounty manager.
Pages:
Jump to: