Managers changing rules midways are a red flag. You should proceed with caution and keep checking if there are participants that experience problems with the changed rules.
On the other hand, if the bounty comes to a successful end complex rules or anything out of the ordinary might reduce the number of participants, and thus raise the value of your shares.
Topic: Change rules in bounty programs. - page 13. (Read 3748 times)
I do not agree if the bounty manager change the existing rules campaign, this is one thing that is not fair,
For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
What do you mean by that highlighted phrase?For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
I've seen bounty campaigns that changed their rules and bounty pool allocations, but all of the participants stakes are still intact and listed on the spreadsheet.
The problem is not the changing of rules, the problem really is; the lazy bounty manager, and bounty campaigns that don't show any spreadsheet!
The only thing we can do is to be disappointed because we can't do anything about it. We can't hold them responsible or liable since we're not protected by any laws concerning bounty campaigns of the ICOs. The best thing we can do is to study first an ICO before we proceed with the bounty so even though they may delay the release of our coins or tokens, at least they're legit to begin with. 
What's there to study? Only presentation. And there are plenty of good, succesful projects who changed their allocation at the end of the ICO.
If you spend time then you can look for projects, the Manager, who is in charge of ICO. Look at past projects. Also look at the composition of the team. Possible you have already worked with this team or this Manager the bounty in the other ICO. .If they changed the conditions there, it is possible that the conditions will also be changed in this project! Most managers Have to say your style) And From project to project, they match that they lead!
I think the companies are disappointed when their pennies are plummeting
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
I believe that companies should not change the date of delivery of reports and the number of coins. I agree that this is not fair.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
But again, there are different situations, and suddenly, the rules change because of what the event, then you can still understand. And when in the middle of the bounty, reduce the number of coins (yes, to pay more people) is not right. I think that it was possible to establish a limit of participants, but this is not profitable for the company. Therefore, company reduce payments.
I think it's fair as long as there is an announcement before the change is applied.
Don't get angry when bounty program change but instead react if bounty manager will change rules before the end of ICO. You can report it to the moderator. Some bounties will give a big allocation for bounty and if they won't reach the required participants they will lessen it.
some would say that it is no problem that if the rules are changed, and some would say that it is extremely wrong to change the rules after starting the project. but i would say that it depends on the project that how big the project is? and when the project is big then the team has to change some rules to complete the project without any problem or with transparency. and if the project is not that big then i think there is no problem if the rules are changed or not.
I think it's annoying things, with a delay in a project that makes the bounty participants work longer or reduce the profit .
I see an increasing tendency of projects lowering their bounty allocation at the close of their ICO. 
That is very disappointing actually, if in the end the bounty allocation will all of a sudden be lessen, then after you will find out that the manager of the campaign are stealing some of the bounty allocation budget. Sometimes there are other CM aretaking advantage their position to rob others bounty participants or cheating in the campaign. But I'm not saying all CM are cheaters. I do not agree if the bounty manager change the existing rules campaign, this is one thing that is not fair,
For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
What do you mean by that highlighted phrase?For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
I've seen bounty campaigns that changed their rules and bounty pool allocations, but all of the participants stakes are still intact and listed on the spreadsheet.
The problem is not the changing of rules, the problem really is; the lazy bounty manager, and bounty campaigns that don't show any spreadsheet!
It's normal to change the rules. People just need to be informed before.
that's not normal especially when they change the bounty budget into a smaller one while the project is a bit successful, i don't want to say the name of the project but it happened to me before and if you experience it you can say that it is frustrating.
It's normal to change the rules. People just need to be informed before.
that's not normal especially when they change the bounty budget into a smaller one while the project is a bit successful, i don't want to say the name of the project but it happened to me before and if you experience it you can say that it is frustrating. 
I understand when some of the bounty campaigns change their rules along the way. Perhaps this is due to the circumstances that arose during the campaign, but it is important that when they change the changes, they should still consider those things that you have already done.
Of course there is some disappointment, but what can I do? There was a bounty from company trade, those who participated there from the first weeks, received 3 or 4 times more than I received in the middle and at the end.
In order for there to be fewer misunderstandings, it's necessary to keep an eye on the thread and updates in the Telegram all the time. Yes, it's difficult and very often unreal if you are involved in several bounty campaigns. But I understood from my own experience that this should be done. And also be sure to carefully read all the rules, so that later there were no surprises. It's a shame when you don't get anything. But I blame myself more often than managers.
I will be disappointed at the first place coz everything is doing their job and bounty manager will change rules without asking permission. But if Bounty manager is good for her/his permission then i can stay at the project til ICO ends.
There is no point in waiting for the fact that everything will always happen according to our desire. In every case there is a place for the human factor, and the moment when the circumstances change the situation. So, all we have to do is accept ...
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
I believe that companies should not change the date of delivery of reports and the number of coins. I agree that this is not fair.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
But again, there are different situations, and suddenly, the rules change because of what the event, then you can still understand. And when in the middle of the bounty, reduce the number of coins (yes, to pay more people) is not right. I think that it was possible to establish a limit of participants, but this is not profitable for the company. Therefore, company reduce payments.
I do not agree if the bounty manager change the existing rules campaign, this is one thing that is not fair,
For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
For example: when bounty starts there is no command to send a report, but bounty manager requires and this makes the participant lose the stake because no report.
If so I may be very disappointed because we have worked with our mindset and time but if only the date is still understandable because we need the process of receiving the prize so hopefully we work hard to get ya we get our rights.
Jump to: