Topic: Change rules in bounty programs. - page 14. (Read 3748 times)
I do not think it's a problem .. although this happens often ... as long as changing the rules are informed to the participants clearly..and more important we as bounty participants are paid.
I think it is inevitable. People running ICOs are often less experienced... besides, "real world" companies do similar things... and it is equally annoying.
If the ICO contract is published, by the way, and if it is well written, the ICO will start in time, no mater what. Do you read contracts before investing?
If the ICO contract is published, by the way, and if it is well written, the ICO will start in time, no mater what. Do you read contracts before investing?
I think if the project suddenly changed the information and the structure of the campaign it doesn`t matter as long as it does not harm investors if it can change it should alleviate the investors.
Those teams that change arbitrarily can only say that they lack the spirit of contract and do not work in a rigorous manner. Usually in a project, changing the rules is normal, but too many changes have been inappropriate.
for thank god i still didn't join campains that changing 2 much, but still thinking that those changes unfair, this is just ads of the project and if u lie about revards this is not show project from the good side
I agree with your last sentence I am amazed by all this, with the fact that the bounty company is irrelevant to the bitcoiner. I want everything in the bitcoin rules from start to finish bounty running yes it's rules and rewards yes. do not change for help
It is true there are some such companies. and they have different reasons, there is because sofcap is not achieved and there are deliberately reduced allocation of prizes for avoiding dumper. But there are also companies that are committed to the allocation of rewards and battles.
changes in the path or rules in the campaign will cause disappointment to the participants, but if the change to the common good, of course be a very good thing as long as it does not change the gifts that have been obtained
Usually the bounty programs changes rules on its campaign only for the number of post to be made. Sometimes they made correction that we must follow in order to received stakes in the end of the week. KYC application also sometimes came up to the end as additional rule in the bounty campaign. And that sometimes disappoints other participants but this is also a need to avoid cheaters.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
I try to make a point to post on their reddit forums, here, medium, twitter, facebook page etc about what they did. It will end up costing them more in the long run.
Change rules are one of those things bounty hunters don't always find interesting if it is possible for bounty managers to notify bounty hunters whenever there is an update in the rules and regulation it will be very nice.
The only thing we can do is to be disappointed because we can't do anything about it. We can't hold them responsible or liable since we're not protected by any laws concerning bounty campaigns of the ICOs. The best thing we can do is to study first an ICO before we proceed with the bounty so even though they may delay the release of our coins or tokens, at least they're legit to begin with. 
What's there to study? Only presentation. And there are plenty of good, succesful projects who changed their allocation at the end of the ICO.
It is impossible to avoid changes of conditions in ICO! Sometimes they can increase for example the number of tweets, retweets,.. etc and so change the ship date reports! But, this should be as the informative! This is usually fixed by the message in the telegram. Not always in time to pay attention to this message! It would be good if there was a telegram to all participants of the company! At least such important changes as changes in the date of sending the report!
I think changing the rules and the number of coins in ICO is very normal because not all ICO's are successful. Sometimes when they did not reach their targets then probably they need to extend the length of the campaign to get more investors.
Unfortunately, the organizers of the bounty campaigns have the right to change the rules, the terms, the amount of payments and we are not in a position to influence this, for that matter.
changes in the path or rules in the campaign will cause disappointment to the participants, but if the change to the common good, of course be a very good thing as long as it does not change the gifts that have been obtained
Any rule if company wants to keep should done right before the campaign begins. If it worth or not that participants will decide and if they like it they would join that campaign else they would leave it and move on to other project as their are many projects which might be better than existing project.
Actually it does not matter if the change from the company does not harm the investor should instead appeal to the investors
I think it would be very disappointing if that happens because if the first rule is changed then it will cause harm also affects the promised payment on the first rule and this can be said SCAM.
Changing rules during the bounty campaigns are very common things.
But if they extend the campaign for long term without any notice on Bitcointalk thread or even on there site, then it is unfair thing with the participants.
According to me they tells about the changed rules one week before the start of next week campaign. Then it is very good for company as well as for the peoples who are participating in this bounty campaign.
I think this small thing shows that, what type of support companies will provide to there customers in future.
But if they extend the campaign for long term without any notice on Bitcointalk thread or even on there site, then it is unfair thing with the participants.
According to me they tells about the changed rules one week before the start of next week campaign. Then it is very good for company as well as for the peoples who are participating in this bounty campaign.
I think this small thing shows that, what type of support companies will provide to there customers in future.
And how would you behave in place of the organizers, if, say, you would not have collected the necessary amount of money? They can not afford to pay at a loss. Especially everyone writes that they reserve the right to change the conditions. I think this is quite normal practice, I know what I'm signing
Not raising enough money simply means not reaching the soft cap. Then the project may be discontinued and no bounties will be paid. But the situation is different when the soft cap has been reached. They all calculated it at the start. You never see the allocation for the founders or team lower; always for the bounty workers.
Once again, all managers always write that they can change the conditions. The moral issue of the project developers is different. Of course, some change the rules, simply because they can and want to pay less. How to relate to this? Of course it's negative. Everything is on the conscience of the people, we can not influence this. Only humility =)
The only thing we can do is to be disappointed because we can't do anything about it. We can't hold them responsible or liable since we're not protected by any laws concerning bounty campaigns of the ICOs. The best thing we can do is to study first an ICO before we proceed with the bounty so even though they may delay the release of our coins or tokens, at least they're legit to begin with.
Jump to: