This is inded disappointing ,but if forced or there is a violation of campaye participants. I think it is also natural.
it all depends on the manager.
Topic: Change rules in bounty programs. - page 24. (Read 3748 times)
If it was originally written in rules that can affect the campaign for generosity, then you can decide for yourself.
Entering the campaign with specific rules, you calculate your work. Change of rules is always negative. Managers should change them only in extreme cases and in advance to warn
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
i think that's very disappointed, changing rules In the middle of the campaign, but the fact that they change the rules because they have enough reasons to do so will maybe acceptable. Aslong as the participants will get paid the right amount in exchange to the work they've done I think that's not a problem. Magbe the campaign have to explain to the participants the reasons why they change rules for them not be in doubt.In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
We don't have changed nothing from the beggining of our bounty program. Everything is clear, so you can join us here if you wish: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.26269697
It is somehow disappointing but things happen. They should make an announcement prior to implementing changes.
Lots of things are happening in crypto. Some of these project are shifting because they did't do their homework or suddenly something happened and they compensate.
And because of high returns in crypto, nobody want to waist their time on these ''acquired'' changes. Even when they are in most cases dishonest.
And because of high returns in crypto, nobody want to waist their time on these ''acquired'' changes. Even when they are in most cases dishonest.
yes it is quite disappointing, but how else could they have told that they can change the rules at any time
I do not like it and many people do not like it. It is not always possible to notice the change quickly. I hope managers in the future from the very beginning will think through everything. But we are all people and not from errors is not insured.
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
i think that's very disappointed, changing rules In the middle of the campaign, but the fact that they change the rules because they have enough reasons to do so will maybe acceptable. Aslong as the participants will get paid the right amount in exchange to the work they've done I think that's not a problem. Magbe the campaign have to explain to the participants the reasons why they change rules for them not be in doubt. In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?
Some campaigns do this thing. Subject to change without notice. They should inform the bounty campaign first, or else they will get negative trust from the moderator. SOme campaign manager will give 1 week or 2 weeks to change their rules which are good.
Situations are different and the rules can be changed in some cases. But if you change the rules, you need to announce this to everyone to see: in bold, red, in the branch and the starting post.
Yeah in that case that was very disappointing but for sure they have their reasons why they change their rules and regulations in ICO but it can loosing their confidence to choose them again whe we apply for campaign.Loosing our trust and feeling disappointed but as far as I know I am not encountering now changing rules the manager of the campaign is I really trusted for being responsible.
I do not like when developers change the rules. It's not fair. But this can be justified only if the rules change for the better. But I have not yet met projects in which the rules were changed for the better. Organizers of the bounty must fulfill their promises.
very disappointing, who have long worked, after the end there is a bad change, it does not match their promise at the beginning.
this situation always feels disappointed to me. when i see the change rules in any campaign, it loses importance and trust.
i start to think about the reality of the project and the team. they have to think about the all rules before they publish and share them with the participants. the small changes are okey but big ones sometimes might be annoying and unacceptable.
i start to think about the reality of the project and the team. they have to think about the all rules before they publish and share them with the participants. the small changes are okey but big ones sometimes might be annoying and unacceptable.
I guess that any ICO which change the rules is lost a lot of confidence of its community and this will be the cause of dump after the listing for sure.
The developers answer all questions, that they reserve the right to change the rules of camping. They always write about it in small print
It can be very disappointing since you are expecting something else with the project and by the end a lot of things are forcefully changed.
Of course, it is but the manager has the right to do any changes while he is managing because sometimes it is based on the amount they raised in the ICO. Don't bother with changes because at least they are giving the bounty for free by just promoting them.
I also have that thought. The important thing is to be rewarded for your efforts during the period you worked. Is better to be rewarded (even if there are changes in the rules) than not to be rewarded and do not have rewards campaigns to participate.
I think the manager must be professional in applying the applicable rules, and can not change the rules as they please.
Jump to: