Change rules in bounty programs. - page 27.

ncBB

full member

Activity: 158

Merit: 100

profittrailer.cn

Quote from: svojoe on December 11, 2017, 12:11:07 PM

I feel very bad and angry. If I choose some bounty campaign to participate in and I follow all the rules I want the same behaviour from the campaign founders.

yes, they do not pay the bounty sometime, hate the campaign founders who don't follow the rules and promises

stomachgrowls

hero member

Activity: 3010

Merit: 794

Quote from: hovrah on December 13, 2017, 01:30:35 AM

Quote from: EtherATM on December 12, 2017, 07:02:37 PM

Quote from: cadreamsurf on December 09, 2017, 12:07:17 AM

No contracts, etc. all build on trust. This is a problem that is difficult to solve.
Everyone is angry when they pay less than they promised. But how to solve it. Just do not support the project in the future. Tell everyone that the project is bad.

Yes, all was build in trust and i think they are privileged change rules bounties campaign with conditional the change must be notified on their website or bounty campaign topic before it's end the bounties campaign.
But i saw some ICOs changed bounties campaign rules without notify. It's like they're cheating participants

with this it is almost impossible to Fight and analyze every ico, we can say that almost every ico company sin precisely with the same changes in conditions. All participants can do nothing but stupidly perform their tasks.

We cant really do nothing if they would decide to change up the rules and payrates in the end of the ICO since they are the ones who do hold up the funds this is why I don't really like for those project that funds aren't being escrowed because the chance of changing payrates would really be high since they do have the full control of the funds and on the tokens available.They can do anything as they can. Sweet promises and generous allocations are just good to see when the campaign is just starting up but later on it would surely change if they do succeed on the sale.

hh4mmm

member

Activity: 378

Merit: 13

although changing of date doesn't really matter, to me what matters is that let everyone be paid at the end of project because so many project have been doing that same way. in terms of changing date i can only say that the bounty manager is actually occupied or busy with other work too,

whaawh

sr. member

Activity: 714

Merit: 251

Quote from: sambuki on December 13, 2017, 02:04:49 PM

Quote from: oscarrsm on November 18, 2017, 09:43:09 AM

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

As long as they paid the rewards, I don't mind with the change they made.

the fact is that in recent years very strongly the moderators have limited the managers of the company, and they in turn are looking for other ways to aggravate the work of users.

sambuki

newbie

Activity: 238

Merit: 0

Quote from: oscarrsm on November 18, 2017, 09:43:09 AM

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

As long as they paid the rewards, I don't mind with the change they made.

dubinsky

newbie

Activity: 224

Merit: 0

the same as it was against the rules of the contract that has been established on the initial deal. not good in fact considering a huge project should not do so because the votes are not professional.

sale.kripta

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 10

It's bad when this happens, you must always adhere to the previously established rules. It's also bad when you do not get an answer in either the telegram channel or the forum.

saint_casanova

member

Activity: 234

Merit: 10

Quote from: oscarrsm on November 18, 2017, 09:43:09 AM

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

Lost of trust from the community if they did something like that.

hovrah

sr. member

Activity: 756

Merit: 250

Quote from: EtherATM on December 12, 2017, 07:02:37 PM

Quote from: cadreamsurf on December 09, 2017, 12:07:17 AM

No contracts, etc. all build on trust. This is a problem that is difficult to solve.
Everyone is angry when they pay less than they promised. But how to solve it. Just do not support the project in the future. Tell everyone that the project is bad.

Yes, all was build in trust and i think they are privileged change rules bounties campaign with conditional the change must be notified on their website or bounty campaign topic before it's end the bounties campaign.
But i saw some ICOs changed bounties campaign rules without notify. It's like they're cheating participants

with this it is almost impossible to Fight and analyze every ico, we can say that almost every ico company sin precisely with the same changes in conditions. All participants can do nothing but stupidly perform their tasks.

EtherATM

member

Activity: 224

Merit: 11

Quote from: cadreamsurf on December 09, 2017, 12:07:17 AM

No contracts, etc. all build on trust. This is a problem that is difficult to solve.
Everyone is angry when they pay less than they promised. But how to solve it. Just do not support the project in the future. Tell everyone that the project is bad.

Yes, all was build in trust and i think they are privileged change rules bounties campaign with conditional the change must be notified on their website or bounty campaign topic before it's end the bounties campaign.
But i saw some ICOs changed bounties campaign rules without notify. It's like they're cheating participants

Raist

full member

Activity: 490

Merit: 102

Quote from: tukagero on November 20, 2017, 07:43:53 AM

Quote from: oscarrsm on November 18, 2017, 09:43:09 AM

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

Its ok as long as in the first place campaign manager already announce that bounty rewards can be change if some problems may happened. But some campaign managers change the rules even the distribution of stakes is already final.

Every serious bounty campaign announce that can change EVERYTHING in bounty campaign. If I was a manager I would do the same completely. How can ICO company predict the BTC/fiat or ETH/fiat ratio? It can double if not triple cost of the bounty campaign these days what is unbearable.

But still only those ICO who are doing this changes very accurately can be considered as honest and having chances to succeed afterwards. Any serious breach of contract with bounty hunters will transform them into... well better not to do this.

ckorbba

full member

Activity: 672

Merit: 144

Quote from: boranes on December 12, 2017, 11:38:58 AM

Quote from: PROdotBITCOIN on December 11, 2017, 12:49:22 PM

Quote from: svojoe on December 11, 2017, 12:11:07 PM

I feel very bad and angry. If I choose some bounty campaign to participate in and I follow all the rules I want the same behaviour from the campaign founders.

I am also angry when the project administration changes the rules after I joined the project. This is not fair. Maybe under the new rules, I would not have agreed to participate, but the time has already been lost

I guess this is what we are all afraid off and probably under new rules you most definitely wouldn't participate, but since some campaigns are changing rules when end is near we don't have much choice, right?

The fact that the company's managers always warn that he does not reserve the right to change the rules and conditions of the campaign and therefore we can not do anything. It is necessary to follow the terms and rules silently and carry out all tasks.

boranes

sr. member

Activity: 644

Merit: 253

Change Your Worlds Build a New Era!

Quote from: PROdotBITCOIN on December 11, 2017, 12:49:22 PM

Quote from: svojoe on December 11, 2017, 12:11:07 PM

I feel very bad and angry. If I choose some bounty campaign to participate in and I follow all the rules I want the same behaviour from the campaign founders.

I am also angry when the project administration changes the rules after I joined the project. This is not fair. Maybe under the new rules, I would not have agreed to participate, but the time has already been lost

I guess this is what we are all afraid off and probably under new rules you most definitely wouldn't participate, but since some campaigns are changing rules when end is near we don't have much choice, right?

ivanst776

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1003

Quote from: Raffielo on December 09, 2017, 12:29:23 AM

Quote from: oscarrsm on November 18, 2017, 09:43:09 AM

How do you feel about the fact that in some bounty companies change the date of delivery of reports. Change the amount of coins.
In general, at the height of the advertising company do what they want. I am amazed at this dishonest game. What is your opinion?

Perhaps you’ve had a personal experience with an ICO that stiffed you? You might have the experience already to know a good deal of knowledge about crypto currency and its flow, so therefore, the simple learning through reading others’ posts and replying to newbie posts with wise counsel may not be enough of a partial reward in itself. I think if you were ripped off, you need to hound the folks at the helm of the ICO you were partnered up with. Otherwise, the silent wheel won’t get its grease. Sometimes, you might have to chalk it up i imagine if the ICO isn’t willing to compensate you through another avenue. It’s worth asking a dev about who works for the disputed ICO.

Recently I participated in a campaign where the manager almost every week reduced the reward to Specter. Of course this is not interesting for the users (win less and often working more) but we have to understand that the value is usually pre-established for all the bonuses (example: 1 million for subscription, 1 for translation and etc) and As the demand for the campaign increases the manager has to balance the paytable to not extrapolate the bonus limit available.

PROdotBITCOIN

full member

Activity: 840

Merit: 100

Quote from: svojoe on December 11, 2017, 12:11:07 PM

I feel very bad and angry. If I choose some bounty campaign to participate in and I follow all the rules I want the same behaviour from the campaign founders.

I am also angry when the project administration changes the rules after I joined the project. This is not fair. Maybe under the new rules, I would not have agreed to participate, but the time has already been lost

svojoe

legendary

Activity: 968

Merit: 1000

einc.io

I feel very bad and angry. If I choose some bounty campaign to participate in and I follow all the rules I want the same behaviour from the campaign founders.

rammanbl4

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

To changes, I am calm,because I can't influence their actions and decisions , Yes I agree that some people behave, to put it mildly it's not fair to the participants of the bonus program.

PutuPartoHarjo

member

Activity: 294

Merit: 10

If the revamped rules leads to good things then I agree I and certainly I support. But if harm then of course it's called unfair because it violates the rules of the project and agreed

alttravel

member

Activity: 406

Merit: 21

Changing the rules during the bounty of the program is unacceptable. This causes a negative attitude on the part of the participants. In fact, participants cease to fulfill the conditions in the future and lose all they earn.

Ratko1922

member

Activity: 175

Merit: 15

General Director at MoonBounties.io

Maybe putting the tokens in escrow would do. Don't have a solution for stakes, though.

Topic: Change rules in bounty programs. - page 27. (Read 3748 times)