Pages:
Author

Topic: Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign - page 2. (Read 1375 times)

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 20
I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lorylore-239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/namelessname-553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/huahui-332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.



This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.


With you respect, I think they need to sanction them to scared those people who trying to cheat. Aside on that hua_hui was literary abuse their rank and position as campaign manager, not only once or twice. If they tolerate them, they continue make it again and again, or in worst many fraudsters were follow their steps.
legendary
Activity: 2828
Merit: 3038
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/lorylore-239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/namelessname-553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/huahui-332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.



This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
Post is pretty messy. OP please read this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574

So, hua-hai posted this address 0x5829AFDc06EA5de1364B3c43367562BA67ed83ad and the same address is in bounty spreadsheed used by user BlockFolks

And hua-hai used this address for his bounty 0x9B7B46e87708ab66ab917129FC109b5F9EA313f0 and the same address was used by user  lorylore here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.24800083
Quote
#JOIN
Bitcointalk username: lorylore
Forum rank: Legendary
Posts count: 2745
ETH address: 0x9B7B46e87708ab66ab917129FC109b5F9EA313f0
Shocked

But you will probably find better connection here:
https://etherscan.io/txs?a=0x9b7b46e87708ab66ab917129fc109b5f9ea313f0&p=4

and here:
https://etherscan.io/tokentxns?a=0x9b7b46e87708ab66ab917129fc109b5f9ea313f0&p=2
Didn't search further.

But this is probably just another coincidence in the sea of forums coincidences  Roll Eyes
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 20

What you mean when you told me to check these links? What wrong if anyone share their ETH address? If you said that no stupid users shared their address to others, I think this forum is full of stupid guys cause it's just a normal thing when you share your wallet address to other people.

Using of same address between original users and their alt accounts are allowed, but I think you cannot get my point in this findings. I post this lapses because both original accounts and alternative accounts are joining in one signature campaign which is prohibited. That is included to the rules and regulation made by the mods.

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him  Huh
I don't defend for him or anyone in this forum Smiley. I just need more evidence, these evidences still not enough for me to believe that they're alts and I think it's also not enough for all other DT member to tag these guys Smiley. That's all.

Evidence I shown in this posts are concrete and solid but if that is not enough for you I don't need to explain more. I do my part and only mods and DT can decide if they can accept the findings I shown.

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

My intention that's why I create this thread is not to destroy the reputation of higher rank like Legendary, all I want is to have fair and equal policy to everyone. It not means that they are in the higher rank they cannot followed the rules and regulations, instead they need to become good example to newly participants and to everyone.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 22
Marketplace for sensor data
I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him  Huh
I don't defend for him or anyone in this forum Smiley. I just need more evidence, these evidences still not enough for me to believe that they're alts and I think it's also not enough for all other DT member to tag these guys Smiley. That's all.
copper member
Activity: 70
Merit: 65
IOS - The secure, scalable blockchain
Can you remember exactly your ETH address and recognise it when any other used your address to apply for any campaign? I can't, it's too difficult to me. It's a string of a lot of characters and I think very little member in here can do that. But I'm not sure if they're alt or not, let wait DT member take a look about this case.

I can generally remember the start and end of it since I regularly check it when entering my address (I'm paranoid of giving the wrong address or getting affected by malware that changes your address to an address owned by the creator of said malware, it was an issue before I'm unsure if it still is a thing). Anyway even if I someone doesn't remember their address, I mentioned what the issue is. You clearly didn't read my reply so I'll quote it for you

Quote
It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway)

Read:the part in bold; if people are entering your campaign with the SAME address then you should be disqualifying them. So is the campaign manager not even checking for duplicates? Is it that easy to alt in his campaign that you don't even need to use a different address, just use the same address and he won't care?

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him  Huh


PS: Keep single replies please, don't make multiple replies in a row with no one else commenting in between
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 22
Marketplace for sensor data
Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

You're severely overestimating the average legendary. Legendary means you have been here for long not that you are a knowledgeable or whatever. I've seen newbies who know more and are smarter than your average purchased legendary signature campaign account.


Quote
. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

That's not the only way alts are determined, there are many many ways to find alts, merits can be a hint but never definitive, friends meriting each other (despite how shady that is overall) is common, doesn't make them alts

Quote
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way

Unless I misread the details, the accused alt of the campaign manager enter his own campaign? Did he not recognise his own address? It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway), or he was alright with it since like he'll get paid for someone else posting thus he's not worthy of being hired either.


Can you remember exactly your ETH address and recognise it when any other used your address to apply for any campaign? I can't, it's too difficult to me. It's a string of a lot of characters and I think very little member in here can do that. But I'm not sure if they're alt or not, let wait DT member take a look about this case.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 22
Marketplace for sensor data
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

Why you cannot try to visit this link:

hua_hui

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23369370

misterbigg

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/187rOvYdoYKHHthcmzvrKcN2UQ5d9E2FU6sOO07ZC5GY/edit#gid=700361341

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22179816

I cannot destroy the reputation of those Legendary users because on the first time I saw it, I was shocked that's why I reviewed it clearly. Why do they need to sharing/exchanging their merits? that is not my basis boy. That proof is enough because no stupid users shared their wallet address to others.
What you mean when you told me to check these links? What wrong if anyone share their ETH address? If you said that no stupid users shared their address to others, I think this forum is full of stupid guys cause it's just a normal thing when you share your wallet address to other people.
copper member
Activity: 70
Merit: 65
IOS - The secure, scalable blockchain
Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

You're severely overestimating the average legendary. Legendary means you have been here for long not that you are a knowledgeable or whatever. I've seen newbies who know more and are smarter than your average purchased legendary signature campaign account.


Quote
. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

That's not the only way alts are determined, there are many many ways to find alts, merits can be a hint but never definitive, friends meriting each other (despite how shady that is overall) is common, doesn't make them alts

Quote
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way

Unless I misread the details, the accused alt of the campaign manager enter his own campaign? Did he not recognise his own address? It means either he sucks at his job as a campaign manager (he should be checking for duplicate addresses anyway), or he was alright with it since like he'll get paid for someone else posting thus he's not worthy of being hired either.

member
Activity: 196
Merit: 20
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

Why you cannot try to visit this link:

hua_hui

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.23369370

misterbigg

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/187rOvYdoYKHHthcmzvrKcN2UQ5d9E2FU6sOO07ZC5GY/edit#gid=700361341

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.22179816

I cannot destroy the reputation of those Legendary users because on the first time I saw it, I was shocked that's why I reviewed it clearly. Why do they need to sharing/exchanging their merits? that is not my basis boy. That proof is enough because no stupid users shared their wallet address to others.
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 22
Marketplace for sensor data
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.
member
Activity: 196
Merit: 20

- Must wear our signature code and avatar
- Do not post all 20 posts within a day or 2. You are supposed to spread out the posting across the whole week.
- No red trust score.
- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.
- If you leave half way, you will not get paid for that week.
- This signature campaign will last for 8 weeks.
Week 1 Mar 14 to Mar 20
Week 2 Mar 21 to Mar 27
Week 3 Mar 28 to Apr 3
Week 4 Apr 4 to Apr 10
Week 5 Apr 11 to Apr 17
Week 6 Apr 18 to Apr 24
Week 7 Apr 25 to May 1
Week 8 May 2 to May 8


You have to wear our signature code and avatar before applying.
- Fill this Google form : https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf3bnZnhXq2CBp-0ZeWV0-erltlwK9HbDMvwDW3o5L_UUm9bw/viewform

Rates, paid in tokens:
Legendary : $800/week
Hero : $600/week
Senior : $400/week
Full member : $200/week
 Member : $100/week
Jr. Member : $50/week

Limited to 10 participants/rank.

Check your weekly allocation here.
Fishcoin Signature Spreadsheet : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit?usp=sharing


That are the rules made by hua_hui but even him, he cannot followed their own rules. As per investigation Signature campaign manager hua_hui was join as participant of their own signature campaign named "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"

During investigation I was found two (2) cases of dual accounts are joining in the signature campaign, as proof I will attached the copy of spreadsheet including the link below:





Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit#gid=1403601995

These are the support information for the regarding dual accounts applied in "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"


BlockFolksHQ - 0x5829AFDc06EA5de1364B3c43367562BA67ed83ad this account is alt account of hua_hui

Proof:

subodhmore123aqs - 0x0FFa2B4178d928AA9311d5a049cb1c6E256e1589 this account is alt account of misterbigg

Proof:

Their wallet address are the same in the photo I attached, be aware with them because they are a signature campaign cheater.

Pages:
Jump to: