It probably does not hurt to have another thread on this ongoing China ban bitcoin dynamic.
- The less Bitcoin has to do with China, the better
Bitcoin gives no shits whether china ban bitcoin or not.... so I am a little worried about your statement of a preference in this matter, and surely we see that china seems to be having quite a few struggles in regards to how to deal with bitcoin.
Years back there may have been many uncertainties in regards to how much governments might be able to stifle bitcoin and its innovations, and surely the chinese government officials are not dummies, and surely that have all kinds of various smart technical and governmental people from whom they can attempt to draw knowledge, but still we witness them shooting themselves in the foot over and over and over, and they still conclude that they are right about this, and they just keep fighting bitcoin in very weird and seemingly draconian ways that seems to cause so many contradictions, including that even their citizens are confused as fuck about what they can do or not do and there remains a lot of lacking of harmony, even though it is quite likely that the Chinese officials are striving to achieve some kind of harmony that is not really possible to achieve with what seems to be their attempts to beat bitcoin down and have wars with bitcoin (and surely shitcoins too.. and I personally am not having as many problems with some of the potential needs to engage in some wars with some of the scamming smoke and mirror bullshit that goes on in some of the shitcoin space)...
I guess my overall point is that china is not getting rid of bitcoin and bitcoin is not getting rid of china, so it seems quasi-nonsensical to be hoping that bitcoin can just move on without china.. because it is not going to happen, even if china may well be causing their lil selfies to be having lesser of a role than what they otherwise would have been able to have if they had figured out some ways in which they might have been able to take some lesser adversarial approaches in their dealing with bitcoin, but hey I am no fucking chinese official, so of course, they have rights to attempt to accomplish objectives that they believe are best for their own citizenry even though from an outside perspective it seems that they are contributing (or exacerbating) some of the problems that they purportedly are striving to fix.. not that outsiders are going to completely understand their total agenda, even if we might have some clues and try to study into the matter more, to the extent that it matters in terms of our ongoing interactions with china whether it is through bitcoin or other ways... whether we are wanting to travel their, deal with their citizens or even to do business with their citizens, and if they are currently claiming that outsiders cannot do business with Chinese citizens in bitcoin, some of that just seems as a lot of fucking overreaching and maybe going to bite them in the ass in terms of neither really being able to enforce it or having to result in selective enforcement.. which surely many governments engage in those kinds of practices too, especially when they create or maintain laws that are seeming to be greatly out of sync with what people are doing or what people want to do.
This appears to fit everything I said over the past 2 years about left wing politics being anti crypto.
With the demographic most likely to support bitcoin and cryptocurrencies being the political right.
I would be curious to know if the USSR had the same mentality of restricting innovation and progress that china does now. And whether that regressive mentality factored in to the USSR's economic implosion. They say history sometimes repeats itself, due to people being determined to never learn from it. Might it be accurate to say that china is USSR 2.0 and the conflict between it and the rest of the world resembles something like a sequel to the cold war?
Unfortunately, this announcement comes hot on the heels of south korea announcing tougher regulation and tax hikes on crypto. We need good news in the cryptosphere to negate the bad news.
I don't disagree with some of your overall points Hydrogen, except to the extent that you are striving to frame these matters in left/right frameworks or commie/capitalism bullshit.
Sure, there are a lot of anti-government folks in bitcoin, and there are people who have their very skewed views of what is too much government or what kinds of areas are o.k. for government intervention and whatnot, and in the end, bitcoin gives no shits... even while in the end, if there are various ways that governments are going to continue to exist (and of course they are), some governments are going to be able to more harmonize themselves with bitcoin and some of the sound money incentives of bitcoin, and some governments are going to have difficulties adapting. It is going to take a decently long time for the various incentive systems to play themselves out, and perhaps even a couple of generations, even though bitcoin is having increasingly strong impacts, even now. So, for sure, we know that some governments are panicking in regards to what to do about bitcoin and how to deal with it and to figure out if there are some balances that can be reached in terms of trying to deal with the actual dynamics of bitcoin including even basic shit like recognizing the difference between bitcoin and shitcoins and also trying to stay up-to-date with what is happening in bitcoin..
We do know that information spread is way more global, but also we have physical bodies too, so the extent to which migration is going to happen into more friendly bitcoin jurisdictions is going to continue to be a phenomena that goes all over the place, including that even governments change who is in charge and also who is able to influence government policy directions change too.. I would not even assert that you are completely wrong in terms of attempting to frame some governments trying to be way more involved in seemingly social benefits areas, and they might end up having struggles in dealing with bitcoin differently than governments who might be less inclined towards providing social benefits, but I doubt that it is helpful to just lump governments into socialist or capitalists and try to presume from there in terms of if there might be more room for their being friendly rather than hostile to bitcoin.