Topic: ckpool.org CLOSED - page 105. (Read 162894 times)

Yeah Happy Birthday CKpool !!!! Loving it !!!

 

Happy Birthday CKPOOL


many years to go I hope.

They're ordered by their current 5s hashrate which isn't shown.

So viewing the 'Active Miners' page, it look like the highest hashes are up top but then not necessarily in order. Is this a reference to in time reward rankings?

@philipma 1957:
  Nice Test you've made on that unit (Merit Send for that work and youre nice video)

Thank you for mining with us!

New Firmware for T1's  make the T1 the most efficient miner there is.

On Efficiency setting 1 do 1298 watts and 14070 gh

1298/14070 = 0.09225 watts

I have this one  setup with it

http://ckpool.org/users/1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje


{"workername": "1JdC6Xg3ajT3rge3FgPNSYYFpmf53Vbtje.firm415",
   "hashrate1m": "13.3T",
   "hashrate5m": "14.6T",
   "hashrate1hr": "13.5T",
   "hashrate1d": "7.45T",
   "hashrate7d": "1.47T",
   "lastshare": 1523877801,
   "shares": 219386815,
   "bestshare": 73580671.0,
   "lns": 219386815.1,
   "luck": 0.99,
   "herp": 217273645.9338703}


After using the 4-15-18 firmware
with a delta 2400 watt server psu

I am doing about  14070 gh and about 1300 watts  for 1300/14070 = 0.0924 watts a gh.

I have the other 5  T1's in the solar array I will need to set them up.

right now  they do 1650 watts each

they will drop to 1325 watts as the MyRig  psu's do 1325 watts.


I will lower power use in the array from 5x1650 = 8250  to  5x1325 = 6625

hash will drop from  76th to 70th

those last  6th are not worth  1625 watts

@ -ck

nice work on the firmware

Sorry, completely missed that one.. oops.. lol

Really? Did you click on the blocks link?

Has the pool found any blocks ?  And if so, anyone know how many ?  The stats page only shows one payout run, so I am assuming one block has been found ?
I have been solo'ing, and I am thinking of coming over to the pool


Thanks!

Yea, same all my hash is here now. Happy mining new pool family.

I did notice my hashrate increased quicker (or seemed like it) after already having some hardware pointed here.

Parlez vous québecois?

;-) Welcome to this side of ze Wall

Sounds good to me

I'll be back in June with 400Th.. Bought/Moving to new home and farm in Quebec...Ontario electricity is just too expensive

Great stuff, welcome aboard. I think you'll be pleased when the next firmware becomes available for your T1s.

My rental dropped off.

so rate went down.

I do have 5 dragon mint t1's pointed at the pool


http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr

around 71 th

Hashrate climbing again.

Hashrate 1 minute: 14.4PH/s
Hashrate 5 minutes: 12.6PH/s
Hashrate 15 minutes: 10.3PH/s

There are two major kinds of miners (heh major miners) that mine on public pools - the first is those that have full control over their hashrate - even if they have only one piece of hardware or an entire farm of their own. These people make choices on their own based on whatever information they can get their hands on and how they interpret it regarding what pools are out there. These are the miners you often see posting here on the forum and while relatively anonymous do have a public face. They're the ones that determine how much hashrate goes to each pool and can drastically change the balance of hashrate between the pools... but it's only a SMALL proportion of the network hashrate in reality. These are the only ones we can possibly attract to this pool. The other type of miner are the large entities that set up farms and have set up deals with the pools they run on and are often even a subsidiary company or the same company as that running the pool - we can't possibly attract them to this pool. Unfortunately I estimate the "public swaying miners" are less than 5% of the network hashrate. Of those, swaying miners are often driven to the bone for making profits and for whatever reason run so tight that they want a "regular income" and as little risk as possible - a small pool cannot provide either of those; it comes with much more risk (and potentially much more gain) but no regular income. These miners probably constitute 95% of the swaying miner hashrate, leaving only a tiny proportion of the network that can "afford" to mine on a smaller pool. This means that a big pool is always guaranteed to attract some miners from the swaying miners, but a small pool has only a minuscule proportion of the network hashrate it can attract.

Until a smaller pool becomes a bigger pool, it cannot become a bigger pool. That's not a typo; it's a cyclical problem. I'm saying it's impossible for a small pool in the current climate to ever get big again unless it has deals with big miners. If this pool was 1EH now, all the new swaying miners will likely make it their first choice since it meets the criteria of regular income and low risk and has the lowest fee anywhere, but even then would never be more than 5% of the network. Slush is unique at meeting this criteria because it's been around as the first pool and still manages to get a big hashrate from the swaying miners, but it's still only 3% of the network hashrate. The rest of the pools aren't really there for you public miners; they have a public face but they have motherfucking huge miners that will only ever mine there, keeping their hashrate high and centralising hashrate.

There are a few reasons for this.
One is that this pool doesn't have frequent payouts, both due to the low hashrate and the slightly different SPLNS method used on CKPool that doesn't give payouts at each block find for every miner.

Another is that it's not advertised or shared anywhere other than specific forums, and generally not suggested on tutorials and other websites to encourage new users.

ck I really love the idea of your pool at the moment I have two miners connected to it.
But few things is really bothering me since I joined.
Why your pool isn't more popular?
What is wrong with other miners so they don't see the benefit of mining in this pool?