Pages:
Author

Topic: Clash of the Titans (Read 3987 times)

zby
legendary
Activity: 1594
Merit: 1001
January 10, 2012, 04:51:18 PM
#47
Whatever happens, MtGox wins.  Every bout of volatility is a gold mine for them through fees.  A thin market with no action is what MtGox doesn't want.

But during sideways movements with lots of trading and a high spread, its the market makers who are raking it in.

this.

it seems to me that by looking at Zhou's spreads, you can tell which way the book is stacked up.  if the mtgox price is say $6 and the spreads at Bitcoinica are $5.95 and $6.10, wouldn't that be reflective of a higher number of buy limit orders vs. seller limit orders?
From what I've seen Zhou executes the limit orders at his price - that is with margin, he does not put those orders directly on MtGox - but rather he waits until matching orders are stacked there.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
January 10, 2012, 04:46:59 PM
#46
Whatever happens, MtGox wins.  Every bout of volatility is a gold mine for them through fees.  A thin market with no action is what MtGox doesn't want.

But during sideways movements with lots of trading and a high spread, its the market makers who are raking it in.

this.

it seems to me that by looking at Zhou's spreads, you can tell which way the book is stacked up.  if the mtgox price is say $6 and the spreads at Bitcoinica are $5.95 and $6.10, wouldn't that be reflective of a higher number of buy limit orders vs. seller limit orders?

Like right now, when the difference between Gox and Bitcoinica's market sell is $0.05, but the difference between Gox and Bitcoinica market buy is $0.08 (and an occasional asterisk)...
Fucking ingenious IMO.  I can't wait to get the resources to provide competition for Bitcoinica.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 12:43:05 PM
#45
Whatever happens, MtGox wins.  Every bout of volatility is a gold mine for them through fees.  A thin market with no action is what MtGox doesn't want.

But during sideways movements with lots of trading and a high spread, its the market makers who are raking it in.

this.

it seems to me that by looking at Zhou's spreads, you can tell which way the book is stacked up.  if the mtgox price is say $6 and the spreads at Bitcoinica are $5.95 and $6.10, wouldn't that be reflective of a higher number of buy limit orders vs. seller limit orders?
legendary
Activity: 826
Merit: 1001
rippleFanatic
January 10, 2012, 12:36:10 PM
#44
Whatever happens, MtGox wins.  Every bout of volatility is a gold mine for them through fees.  A thin market with no action is what MtGox doesn't want.

But during sideways movements with lots of trading and a high spread, its the market makers who are raking it in.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 10:27:17 AM
#43
Something like that is likely to result in a Double-Zhoutonging!!!  Could open a rift in the Satoshi-time continuum.

everyone has to say this at least once in their lifetime here on the Forum.

it just rolls off your tong. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1692
Merit: 1018
January 10, 2012, 06:49:40 AM
#42
Whatever happens, MtGox wins.  Every bout of volatility is a gold mine for them through fees.  A thin market with no action is what MtGox doesn't want.
legendary
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 06:21:32 AM
#41
Never seen a misclick-panic before?

They always remind me to check I'm using the correct sell/buy box on Gox, they look so similar. Wink Some people panic after they mis-click and do the opposite move instantly afterwards.

Or they really want to trigger Bitcoinica. these only go one way though, if I understand correctly, because it's a bucket shop if it can be. Can't say what kinds of exploits exist for certain though, I don't use Bitcoinica.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 06:01:39 AM
#40
Now the bot ran out of money?


No orders in the range for making money and no one cares to place any right now ;-)

Can you explain this further? Im new.

*edit= got rid of big pic



Every sell order needs a buyer and every buy order needs a seller in order for a transaction to occur.  In order for profit to be made, you would ideally sell higher than the current highest bid and buy lower than the lowest ask.  So for example, right now (as far as i can tell) the lowest ask is 6.38, while the highest bid is 6.40, which is higher than the lowest ask.  So then when you put buy orders below that ask and sell orders above that bid, whether you do it manually or automatically, it's going to be hard to get those orders filled.

Some bots will keep running and put LOTS of buys and sells really really close together, some small (to test the price or whatever), and in these times where no one is really doing any trading, the bots will still trade pennies back and forth because their buys and sells touch every once in a while.

Makes sense, thanks.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
January 10, 2012, 05:50:14 AM
#39
Now the bot ran out of money?


No orders in the range for making money and no one cares to place any right now ;-)

Can you explain this further? Im new.

*edit= got rid of big pic



Every sell order needs a buyer and every buy order needs a seller in order for a transaction to occur.  In order for profit to be made, you would ideally sell higher than the current highest bid and buy lower than the lowest ask.  So for example, right now (as far as i can tell) the lowest ask is 6.38, while the highest bid is 6.40, which is higher than the lowest ask.  So then when you put buy orders below that ask and sell orders above that bid, whether you do it manually or automatically, it's going to be hard to get those orders filled.

Some bots will keep running and put LOTS of buys and sells really really close together, some small (to test the price or whatever), and in these times where no one is really doing any trading, the bots will still trade pennies back and forth because their buys and sells touch every once in a while.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 05:40:09 AM
#38
Now the bot ran out of money?


No orders in the range for making money and no one cares to place any right now ;-)

Can you explain this further? Im new.

*edit= got rid of big pic

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 05:30:14 AM
#37
Someone hit it with a hammer.... it's stuck.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
January 10, 2012, 05:25:44 AM
#36
Now the bot ran out of money?



No orders in the range for making money and no one cares to place any right now ;-)
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 05:23:06 AM
#35
Now the bot ran out of money?

hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
January 10, 2012, 04:51:18 AM
#34
Start resources 5000 bitcoin / $5000

Start price: $6.50


If you buy 1 btc at $6.75
and sell 1 btc at $6.25

You now have 5000 bitcoin / $4999.50

That's a losing scenerio every time.

Even when you focus on the asymmetrical distribution of bid/asks, as long as 1 coin is bought on the right side of the starting price and as long as 1 coin is sold on the left side of the start price, you will lose money. We know they aren't using the asymmetry to profit because the buys and sells occur simultaneously.


The only instance I can come up with where you'd make money is by profiting from the number of transactions someone makes using your interface, i.e. Bitcoinica.


I make that kind of "mistake" when I stop and restart my bot during price swings ... old bids / asks will be left in wrong places, and then may get filled when I'd rather them not, but... not large amounts by any means.
But then, my bot is not so sophisticated yet.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:50:47 AM
#33
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:44:57 AM
#32
Unless you expect the price to rise in the future, so are willing to take a loss for now in order to accumulate btc. It may still be cheaper than buying all at once or gradually.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:39:17 AM
#31
Start resources 5000 bitcoin / $5000

Start price: $6.50


If you buy 1 btc at $6.75
and sell 1 btc at $6.25

You now have 5000 bitcoin / $4999.50

That's a losing scenerio every time.

Even when you focus on the asymmetrical distribution of bid/asks, as long as 1 coin is bought on the right side of the starting price and as long as 1 coin is sold on the left side of the start price, you will lose money. We know they aren't using the asymmetry to profit because the buys and sells occur simultaneously.


The only instance I can come up with where you'd make money is by profiting from the number of transactions someone makes using your interface, i.e. Bitcoinica.

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:16:56 AM
#30
If it is one person what would their motive be?

1. To declare his presence and might
2. To show price corridor which he think should be
3. To count the robots on the market

UPD:
4. He bought chunck of bitcoins without moving the price

Now I think its this. What do I know though.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 03:14:43 AM
#29
This is too crazy. Someone should get tux on IRC and figure out if theres something wrong on his end.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 03:08:55 AM
#28
This is not about volatility.
Pages:
Jump to: