Pages:
Author

Topic: Clash of the Titans - page 2. (Read 3968 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 04:07:41 AM
#27
You're absolutely right. Bitcoinica is most definitely the culprit. This manipulation never occurred before its presence and the site creator must have foreseen his masterfully crafted con way ahead of schedule. He's not a dumb guy and if anyone could do something inappropriate in front of our faces, it would be him.

Yeah.... let's get the pitchforks!

Seriously guys, there are other possibilities here.  There are lots of people who profit from volatility.  We have to go through this phase before we can move on.  We won't have the next wave up until we lose the exuberance-paranoia cycle.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:07:18 AM
#26
Its like someone with a machete clearing a path
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 04:03:39 AM
#25
You're absolutely right. Bitcoinica is most definitely the culprit. This manipulation never occurred before its presence and the site creator must have foreseen his masterfully crafted con way ahead of schedule. He's not a dumb guy and if anyone could do something inappropriate in front of our faces, it would be him.
hero member
Activity: 1138
Merit: 523
January 10, 2012, 03:55:06 AM
#24
Quote
Something is up. I can smell it.

Just bitcoinica messing with the market so that A they don't have to execute limit orders close to market and B they're creating a spread to work. Think about how Zhoutong'd otherwise make any money in a more or less mono-directional market.

hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 03:39:22 AM
#23
I can understand someone making a critical error to their own demise once.


but twice? fuck no.


three times? not in this lifetime.




Something is up. I can smell it.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Shame on everything; regret nothing.
January 10, 2012, 03:17:09 AM
#22
I figure it's someone with USD and no BTC that accidentally left a sell order at $6.00, and as soon as they executed buy up to $6.70, the sell order was executed with the newly received coins.



god, wouldn't you just feel like a total douche?
Yep, I have, several times in fact.  I think my biggest fuckup like this was a 300 btc buy, but thankfully the spread wasn't nearly so wide.

Ha and here I was all butthurt last night over accidentally selling nine coins at $7.  I think I can get over it much easier now, thanks guys.  :-)
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
January 10, 2012, 03:04:40 AM
#21
the bitcoin scented candle

and smell like BULLSHIT!!

 Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 387
Merit: 250
January 10, 2012, 02:44:21 AM
#20
I figure it's someone with USD and no BTC that accidentally left a sell order at $6.00, and as soon as they executed buy up to $6.70, the sell order was executed with the newly received coins.



god, wouldn't you just feel like a total douche?
Yep, I have, several times in fact.  I think my biggest fuckup like this was a 300 btc buy, but thankfully the spread wasn't nearly so wide.
newbie
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
January 10, 2012, 02:35:58 AM
#19
That is one hell of a candlestick.  Does anybody have the technical name for it?

I don't know the technical name, but i think we should call it madnipulator
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
January 10, 2012, 02:31:42 AM
#18
If it is one person what would their motive be?

1. To declare his presence and might
2. To show price corridor which he think should be
3. To count the robots on the market

UPD:
4. He bought chunck of bitcoins without moving the price
hero member
Activity: 1138
Merit: 523
January 10, 2012, 02:29:34 AM
#17
Nah this is just Zhoutong counter selling into price spikes so he won't have to execute any in place limit orders under his 4second or whatever delay rule.

It's also funny how this seems to really bork Gox's websocket amongst other things.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 02:27:46 AM
#16
So, who profits from volatility?
Good traders.  It's like christmas for them.  I'm stuck in a long position above $7 and I refuse to liquidate.  If I wasn't stuck in a position I would have had an orgasm during that swing.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 02:27:24 AM
#15
If it is one person what would their motive be?

Lets look at the result of their actions. Clearing out the asks and bids between 6 and 7 takes away the market depth between those numbers. This creates volatility for hours as people try to agree on a price again.

So, who profits from volatility?

If that was their goal, they seem to have failed.  It's right back where it was, and both sides of the order book are filling back in.
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 02:24:03 AM
#14
That is one hell of a candlestick.  Does anybody have the technical name for it?  You know, like those other 40 names for candlesticks like morning star and shit?

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
January 10, 2012, 02:23:13 AM
#13
I figure it's someone with USD and no BTC that accidentally left a sell order at $6.00, and as soon as they executed buy up to $6.70, the sell order was executed with the newly received coins.



lol.... that seems fairly likely
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 02:22:39 AM
#12
Someone checking to see if they can trigger some liquidation at Bitcoinica?
sr. member
Activity: 387
Merit: 250
January 10, 2012, 02:22:06 AM
#11
I figure it's someone with USD and no BTC that accidentally left a sell order at $6.00, and as soon as they executed buy up to $6.70, the sell order was executed with the newly received coins.

sr. member
Activity: 423
Merit: 250
January 10, 2012, 02:19:01 AM
#10
hero member
Activity: 531
Merit: 505
January 10, 2012, 02:18:49 AM
#9
This happened yesterday at about the same time of day, too.

Either:

a) the same person sells and buys
b) Zhoutongs algorithms gone maid
c) MtGox own trading against
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
January 10, 2012, 02:18:04 AM
#8
I don't care what it is, I just hope it keeps up

gotta love this volatility
this.
Pages:
Jump to: