Author

Topic: Claymore's Dual Ethereum AMD+NVIDIA GPU Miner v15.0 (Windows/Linux) - page 1419. (Read 6588443 times)

hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
rejects on DCR, not ETH maybe, use port 9115 for DCR
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
I set it up last night and ran it on two of my rigs I was very impressed. I am having some problems though. After about 30 min it started rejecting all shares on both coins. I thought maybe it was the dag so I deleted it and started again but it did the same thing. It runs for between 30 min and a hour then it rejects every single share. Any ideas or suggestions?
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
I use Claymore's Dual Ethereum+Decred GPU Miner v1.0 in pool http://ethpool.org
I see in statistic Effective Hashrate   and not see Shares (Invalid / Valid / %)

But miner share found!

http://savepic.ru/9327439.png

It norm?
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
Claymore, i want testing my card on -dcri more than 100, it may get more MH by DCR on same speed ETH

Quote
If i put -100 mV and +50Powertune it will crash immediately.

on mining my Nano stable, but without it may crash  Smiley


Fury X http://club.dns-shop.ru/forum/?action=go_post&id=1222368

16.4.1 did the trick! thx mate! Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
full member
Activity: 201
Merit: 100
I'm still getting rejects on dwarfpool and all accepted on ethermine.

It would be nice to display the number of rejected shares(or accepted) at least for easyer troubleshooting Wink
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
Claymore, i want testing my card on -dcri more than 100, it may get more MH by DCR on same speed ETH

Quote
If i put -100 mV and +50Powertune it will crash immediately.

on mining my Nano stable, but without it may crash  Smiley


Fury X http://club.dns-shop.ru/forum/?action=go_post&id=1222368
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100

Congrats!

The only difference we have is that i'm using older drivers. That could indeed help.

If i put -100 mV and +50Powertune it will crash immediately. Mine is a 6card rig, so could be that it can't handle that Smiley

Thx for the info mate!

Will do some testing!


My 290(reference) rig does best with dcri at 40.

600Mh per card on DCR and 27.5 on Eth.

So i'm very pleased!
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 100
-dcri more than 100 need for this cards

Nano?

What are your complete settings?

100 wil crash the system over here.

Powertune?

mine's at 0%

Core 1000, vddc -100, gives me 28Mh eth per card and 800Mh dcr per card..

Any suggestions?
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
-dcri more than 100 need for this cards
legendary
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1708
The Fury or the 280x/7970 seems best for merged mining.

With a 280X I get like 22MH stock but 21MH/330DCR.

The 7950 or Pitcairns aren't worth it.

With 5x 280x I got this

ETH only 108MH

30%    102MH/1540
50%     94MH/2343
70%     84MH/3000
100%   73MH/3632

EDIT after crunching the numbers the 30% is best and yield 0.0388 BTC per day versus 0.0352 BTC with ETH only mining.
fee not included.
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
downvolt -96 mV get 28.8m + 1440m
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
sr. member
Activity: 445
Merit: 255
Thanks!

 R9 Nano
-dcri 100 - 27m eth and 1360m dcr
-dcri 60 - 28.8m eth and 760m dcr
-dcri 30 - 27m eth and 416m dcr

 https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/19156-dcr-decred-gibridnyi-powpos-btcsuite-devs-tonny-novykh-vozmozhnostei-go-18012016/page-38#entry409614
Hello,
Whats setting are you using for the nano ( overclock ? powertune?) please ?
Thanks
hero member
Activity: 1988
Merit: 593
Thanks!

 R9 Nano
-dcri 100 - 27m eth and 1360m dcr
-dcri 60 - 28.8m eth and 760m dcr
-dcri 30 - 27m eth and 416m dcr

 https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/topic/19156-dcr-decred-gibridnyi-powpos-btcsuite-devs-tonny-novykh-vozmozhnostei-go-18012016/page-38#entry409614

but x11 nicehash more profitable today on my card (5.7$)
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
For my 7970, there is no noticeable increase. For my R9 390, the improvement is  around  4-5%. So it is good.
But the computer is less responsive.
Jump to: