Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 707.

denis1995

full member

Activity: 256

Merit: 100

Quote from: adaseb on November 06, 2016, 12:16:40 PM

After much testing. The most ideal speed is at 1070/1375. Going any higher frequency on the memory results in no speed changes. Same with going to the previous or next memory strap. I think my limitation is this CRAPPY Sempron single core processor because I was able to go above 50Sol/s in an i3 rig.

For any 7950 7970 7990 280x with H5GQ2H24AFR MEMORY you can use this

Quote

40 9C 00 00 33 31 33 20 00 00 00 00 84 94 22 10 F0 54 09 06 0F 0B A2 01 00 23 80 00 22 AA 1C 00 12 01 14 20 8A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 06 05 0B 0C 11 0C 10 0D
80 38 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 E7 AC 35 20 50 55 0B 0D 1A 97 34 03 00 24 81 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 06 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0C 08 15 19 21 18 1B 11
A0 86 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 31 46 24 50 55 0C 0D 1C 18 A5 03 00 26 A1 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 07 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0D 0A 18 1B 25 19 1D 11
1C 19 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 B5 46 27 50 55 0C 0D 1E 99 05 04 00 26 A2 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 08 14 20 AA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0E 0A 1A 1E 28 1A 1F 11
78 5D 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 6B BD 57 2D 60 55 0D 0E 22 9C 96 04 00 28 C3 00 22 BB 1C 00 53 0A 14 20 BA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 10 0C 1E 22 2E 1D 23 12
10 98 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 8C C5 48 2F 60 55 0F 0F 25 1E 17 05 00 48 C4 00 22 CC 1C 00 5C 0B 14 20 4A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 12 0D 20 25 32 1F 26 13
30 E6 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 AD CD 49 2F 70 55 0F 10 29 21 98 05 00 4A E5 00 22 EE 1C 00 64 0D 14 20 5A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 14 0E 24 2A 38 22 2A 14
40 0D 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 CE 51 4A 2F 70 55 10 10 2B A2 18 06 00 4A E6 00 22 00 9D 00 64 0E 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 15 0F 27 2D 3C 23 2C 14
50 34 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 10 5A 5B 32 80 55 11 11 2E A5 99 06 00 4C 06 01 22 11 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 17 11 2B 31 42 26 2F 15
60 5B 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 31 62 5C 34 80 55 11 11 30 A7 1A 07 00 4C 06 01 22 22 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 19 12 2F 36 48 28 31 15

Here are some benchmarks

Only 1 I left stock the rest are modded.

Try it and let me know what speed you guys get. Maybe with an i7 you can get 60Sol/s on a 280x.

EDIT: Now they are all running at 50Sol/s. I think the way Claymore calculates speed isn't accurate sometimes.
[/quote]

What is this? H5GQ2H24AFR MEMORY and how to use it is this on linux? I am on windows 7 with 280 and 280x cards and 1 390 how i can boost more than 45 or 50?

Walrusbonzo

hero member

Activity: 682

Merit: 500

Quote from: citronick on November 06, 2016, 10:40:29 AM

Hi Claymore,

Do you intend to have a "-ethi 16" equivalent for your zec miner?

My 390s are running at full speed but since its has 8Gb Vram, I am sure you can push this miner to squeeze the last bits of that 8GB.

Perhaps a switch to do turbo mode?

Thanks

Claymore's miner currently uses less than 1GB per card, so he'd have to make some fundamental change for it to require over 4GB and therefore make your 8GB card "more useful".

bittawm

legendary

Activity: 1894

Merit: 1087

can someone please help me

I was getting 33sols before using other program

I switched to claymors and started getting less because I had really new drivers

so I downgraded to the right driver (brand new GPUS)

I had some issues getting my PC to recognise my gpus

however now its up and running

1gpu gets 40 solds and the other gpu is only getting 10 sols... whats happening?

i then switched it to etc to see if it made a difference

an now i have 1gpu hashing at 25mhs and 1 gpu hashing at 4mhs

why the hell is one of my cards going super slow

its temp is 55 and fan of 14% (looks to mee like its not working)

if anyone can help me i would be forever grateful

Yatsida

newbie

Activity: 67

Merit: 0

Quote from: adaseb on November 06, 2016, 12:16:40 PM

http://i68.tinypic.com/npghs7.png

After much testing. The most ideal speed is at 1070/1375. Going any higher frequency on the memory results in no speed changes. Same with going to the previous or next memory strap. I think my limitation is this CRAPPY Sempron single core processor because I was able to go above 50Sol/s in an i3 rig.

For any 7950 7970 7990 280x with H5GQ2H24AFR MEMORY you can use this

Quote

40 9C 00 00 33 31 33 20 00 00 00 00 84 94 22 10 F0 54 09 06 0F 0B A2 01 00 23 80 00 22 AA 1C 00 12 01 14 20 8A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 06 05 0B 0C 11 0C 10 0D
80 38 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 E7 AC 35 20 50 55 0B 0D 1A 97 34 03 00 24 81 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 06 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0C 08 15 19 21 18 1B 11
A0 86 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 31 46 24 50 55 0C 0D 1C 18 A5 03 00 26 A1 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 07 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0D 0A 18 1B 25 19 1D 11
1C 19 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 B5 46 27 50 55 0C 0D 1E 99 05 04 00 26 A2 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 08 14 20 AA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0E 0A 1A 1E 28 1A 1F 11
78 5D 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 6B BD 57 2D 60 55 0D 0E 22 9C 96 04 00 28 C3 00 22 BB 1C 00 53 0A 14 20 BA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 10 0C 1E 22 2E 1D 23 12
10 98 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 8C C5 48 2F 60 55 0F 0F 25 1E 17 05 00 48 C4 00 22 CC 1C 00 5C 0B 14 20 4A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 12 0D 20 25 32 1F 26 13
30 E6 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 AD CD 49 2F 70 55 0F 10 29 21 98 05 00 4A E5 00 22 EE 1C 00 64 0D 14 20 5A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 14 0E 24 2A 38 22 2A 14
40 0D 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 CE 51 4A 2F 70 55 10 10 2B A2 18 06 00 4A E6 00 22 00 9D 00 64 0E 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 15 0F 27 2D 3C 23 2C 14
50 34 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 10 5A 5B 32 80 55 11 11 2E A5 99 06 00 4C 06 01 22 11 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 17 11 2B 31 42 26 2F 15
60 5B 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 31 62 5C 34 80 55 11 11 30 A7 1A 07 00 4C 06 01 22 22 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 19 12 2F 36 48 28 31 15

Here are some benchmarks

Only 1 I left stock the rest are modded.

Try it and let me know what speed you guys get. Maybe with an i7 you can get 60Sol/s on a 280x.

EDIT: Now they are all running at 50Sol/s. I think the way Claymore calculates speed isn't accurate sometimes.
[/quote]

It seems the Calymore ZCash miners use very little CPU. So why would that affect the CPU so much?

denis1995

full member

Activity: 256

Merit: 100

Quote from: cptfisher on November 06, 2016, 11:47:45 AM

at moment im using this to mine zcash calssic... better profitability than zcash as also there is not even dev fee for them... but only advantage of this miner is coz it is win and is very easy to downlot graphic card... else linux miner was way more stable and faster

Where to mine zcash classic i cant find a pool not even the coin.. Thanks you in advanced

molitar

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

Quote from: tiCeR on November 06, 2016, 12:17:32 PM

i missed the 1.1 version download :/ can someone send it to me please until claymore edited the cade ?

It's already back up check first post.

Meech

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

All this talk about price drop is irrelevant at this point. Do you really believe it would maintain above Bitcoin? It's supply and demand.
I get tired of hearing short term speculations. How about all those die-hard souls who mined Btc from the start, where are they now? It took a couple years and that's only because it was the first and unknown at the time.

Claymore, hope all is well and thanks for your candidness of the situation. Looking forward to more optimization to get us closer to your original goal.

I sold all my r9 280x's, 290x's months ago but I'm sure efficiency will run the game looking forward.
Are rx470's, 480's still the way to go for efficiency? Restocking my rigs in the coming weeks. (Much rather run a rig at 700w instead of 1100w).

molitar

sr. member

Activity: 322

Merit: 250

I mine for profit but I don't just dump. I currently have 37 Eth coins takes me 3 days to make a coin so I been sitting on them for a while. I mine for a profit but also hold for a profit. To many miners with mine and dump mentality and does not even care what they sell for. These type of people could never be a successful business man as they would put themselves out of business under selling everyone else where they don't make a profit. Guess we can be glad these idiots don't run business or they would put others out of business before they collapsed themselves.

Only in mining have I seen such horrible business mentality from so many they don't even consider it a business and just out to make a profit and destroy the coin in general as they have no interest in currency. This ruins it for everyone.

tiCeR

hero member

Activity: 1946

Merit: 867

Defend Bitcoin and its PoW: bitcoincleanup.com

i missed the 1.1 version download :/ can someone send it to me please until claymore edited the cade ?

adaseb

legendary

Activity: 3808

Merit: 1723

After much testing. The most ideal speed is at 1070/1375. Going any higher frequency on the memory results in no speed changes. Same with going to the previous or next memory strap. I think my limitation is this CRAPPY Sempron single core processor because I was able to go above 50Sol/s in an i3 rig.

For any 7950 7970 7990 280x with H5GQ2H24AFR MEMORY you can use this

Quote

40 9C 00 00 33 31 33 20 00 00 00 00 84 94 22 10 F0 54 09 06 0F 0B A2 01 00 23 80 00 22 AA 1C 00 12 01 14 20 8A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 06 05 0B 0C 11 0C 10 0D
80 38 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 E7 AC 35 20 50 55 0B 0D 1A 97 34 03 00 24 81 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 06 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0C 08 15 19 21 18 1B 11
A0 86 01 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 31 46 24 50 55 0C 0D 1C 18 A5 03 00 26 A1 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 07 14 20 9A 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0D 0A 18 1B 25 19 1D 11
1C 19 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 29 B5 46 27 50 55 0C 0D 1E 99 05 04 00 26 A2 00 22 AA 1C 00 4B 08 14 20 AA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 0E 0A 1A 1E 28 1A 1F 11
78 5D 02 00 55 51 33 20 00 00 00 00 6B BD 57 2D 60 55 0D 0E 22 9C 96 04 00 28 C3 00 22 BB 1C 00 53 0A 14 20 BA 88 00 A0 00 00 01 20 10 0C 1E 22 2E 1D 23 12
10 98 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 8C C5 48 2F 60 55 0F 0F 25 1E 17 05 00 48 C4 00 22 CC 1C 00 5C 0B 14 20 4A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 12 0D 20 25 32 1F 26 13
30 E6 02 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 AD CD 49 2F 70 55 0F 10 29 21 98 05 00 4A E5 00 22 EE 1C 00 64 0D 14 20 5A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 14 0E 24 2A 38 22 2A 14
40 0D 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 CE 51 4A 2F 70 55 10 10 2B A2 18 06 00 4A E6 00 22 00 9D 00 64 0E 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 15 0F 27 2D 3C 23 2C 14
50 34 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 10 5A 5B 32 80 55 11 11 2E A5 99 06 00 4C 06 01 22 11 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 17 11 2B 31 42 26 2F 15
60 5B 03 00 77 71 33 20 00 00 00 00 31 62 5C 34 80 55 11 11 30 A7 1A 07 00 4C 06 01 22 22 9D 00 6C 0F 14 20 6A 89 00 A0 00 00 01 20 19 12 2F 36 48 28 31 15

[/quote]

Here are some benchmarks

Only 1 I left stock the rest are modded.

Try it and let me know what speed you guys get. Maybe with an i7 you can get 60Sol/s on a 280x.

EDIT: Now they are all running at 50Sol/s. I think the way Claymore calculates speed isn't accurate sometimes.

xeridea

sr. member

Activity: 449

Merit: 251

Quote from: Tmdz on November 06, 2016, 11:43:56 AM

The only reason anyone gives a shit is because they think not having a stable windows miner would earn them more profit.

This. Tons of posts about how "greedy" Claymore made a stable miner for Windows. Now mining is more open to the masses, so it's more fair, and mining is less headache. People claim this miner is the cause of price drop. But they don't realize it has been dropping since release, price was way to high due to scarcity, now it is just correcting for higher miner reward, and as time goes on more coins get mined, even without slow start. I think all the posts are just greedy people themselves, that don't want to share any profit. Even with price drop, it is still more profitable than any other coin. Ethereum is good to mine now also if people don't want to mine this coin that only has 3.5 month ROI. 2 week ROI was totally unsustainable.

kpierce77

legendary

Activity: 1540

Merit: 1002

So quick question: This miner says that I'm mining at 192 H/s. However NiceHash is reporting 140 SOLS/s. My question is does 192 H/s translate to 140 SOLS/s, or should NiceHash be reporting what the miner's saying which, again, is 192 H/s?

corather

legendary

Activity: 1708

Merit: 1000

Solarcoin.org

Quote from: agis6 on November 06, 2016, 11:12:25 AM

Quote from: marvykkio on November 06, 2016, 10:54:34 AM

I understand that claymore has used some of the code to another developer, but it seems exaggerated to make a controversy and point the finger at a person, I remind you that if there were no developers we could go to extract money with crappy programs that create , not optimized, then I remember, and also the fastest miner that there is at this moment, I have not tried the silent miner, but I tried just to Genoil, I get 25 hs per card, while I get claymore 52 per card, then I saw that claymore and the only updates its miner, others do 1 max 2 updates and then stop, so do not always complain and thank those who work to make the miner home available for us fans ,.
Unfortunately, the human being does not understand what it means to be a community, and help each other, greed is rampant in our Veneda centuries, so I'm not surprised at all, find me some other miner for windows that exceeds 52 h / s of 390x on a single zcash. I say it does not exist.

sorry for my english.

google translador rulezzz Grin

You are missing the point.
Claymore is using his good reputation (because of his other good miners) and he is stealing, and rebranding someone else's code.
It makes no difference if there is no other Windows miner at the moment (genoil called his own miner "a piece of shit"). You are still paying 2.5% of your hardware and electricity bill for a global replace and a compilation... to someone who admitted that he stole the code when he was caught...

And do have a look some posts before... some are reporting some "strange" behavior of his miner

Newbie account.

Claymore directly took control within 24 hours. New version is in the works with copyright notices included.

This is no longer an issue.

Dunkelheit667

legendary

Activity: 1045

Merit: 1157

no degradation

Not sure if this was reported before... Looks like the miner will not switch to a failover pool specified in epools.txt if he can connect to the main pool and there is a timeout:

Code:

17:37:28:253	920	ZEC: 4 pools are specified
17:37:28:256	920	Main ZCash pool is equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357
...
17:37:38:550	2390	ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> port 3357
17:37:38:606	2390	send: {"id": 1, "method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["equihashminer", null, "equihash.eu.nicehash.com", "3357"]}
17:37:38:607	2390	send: {"id": 2, "method": "mining.authorize", "params": ["xxx","z"]}
17:37:38:608	2390	send: {"id": 5, "method": "mining.extranonce.subscribe", "params": []}
17:37:38:608	2390	ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
17:37:41:806	2390	checkread timeout
...
17:38:07:440	2390	checkread timeout
17:38:08:853	920	GPU0 t=52C fan=20%
17:38:08:856	920	em hbt: 30422, fm hbt: 62, 
17:38:08:857	920	watchdog - thread 0, hb time 110
17:38:08:857	920	watchdog - thread 1, hb time 94
17:38:10:637	2390	checkread timeout
17:38:10:638	2390	ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...
17:38:30:642	2390	ZEC: Stratum - connecting to 'equihash.eu.nicehash.com' <5.153.50.217> port 3357
17:38:30:746	2390	send: {"id": 1, "method": "mining.subscribe", "params": ["equihashminer", null, "equihash.eu.nicehash.com", "3357"]}
17:38:30:747	2390	send: {"id": 2, "method": "mining.authorize", "params": ["xxx","z"]}
17:38:30:747	2390	send: {"id": 5, "method": "mining.extranonce.subscribe", "params": []}
17:38:30:748	2390	ZEC: Stratum - Connected (equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357)
17:38:33:953	2390	checkread timeout
17:38:37:153	2390	checkread timeout
17:38:39:174	920	GPU0 t=52C fan=20%
17:38:39:177	920	em hbt: 8531, fm hbt: 31, 
17:38:39:178	920	watchdog - thread 0, hb time 78
17:38:39:178	920	watchdog - thread 1, hb time 78
17:38:40:347	2390	checkread timeout
...
17:39:02:783	2390	checkread timeout
17:39:02:784	2390	ZEC: Job timeout, disconnect, retry in 20 sec...

cptfisher

hero member

Activity: 649

Merit: 505

at moment im using this to mine zcash calssic... better profitability than zcash as also there is not even dev fee for them... but only advantage of this miner is coz it is win and is very easy to downlot graphic card... else linux miner was way more stable and faster

Tmdz

hero member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 1000

The only reason anyone gives a shit is because they think not having a stable windows miner would earn them more profit.

fredeq

legendary

Activity: 1537

Merit: 1005

Quote from: ivomm on November 06, 2016, 08:44:32 AM

P.S. In http://www.whattomine.com/coins now and then appears UTC on top - currently 3.5$ profit for 280x. I am afraid, however, that this coin is in danger of delisting in Bittrex and the buy offers are pretty small.

Yeah I have delisted it again as it was misleading.
Sometimes the diff drops to the super low values and coin boosts on the ranking, but there are not enough buy orders for this to be sustainable.

Btw anyone got their 380 faster? 30H/s is pretty slow Tongue

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

I do not defend anyone, you and true claymore was wrong, but he amesso which used some of the code, and withdrew its release, now he says he was not aware of that code, we want to give the benefit of the doubt? Now we see the next version that releases,.
for the problem of the 2.5% fee will have reason and a little high as a fee, as well calculating the fee of pools, also he said that this tax will bring it to 1% just believe?

agis6

newbie

Activity: 27

Merit: 0

Quote from: marvykkio on November 06, 2016, 10:54:34 AM

I understand that claymore has used some of the code to another developer, but it seems exaggerated to make a controversy and point the finger at a person, I remind you that if there were no developers we could go to extract money with crappy programs that create , not optimized, then I remember, and also the fastest miner that there is at this moment, I have not tried the silent miner, but I tried just to Genoil, I get 25 hs per card, while I get claymore 52 per card, then I saw that claymore and the only updates its miner, others do 1 max 2 updates and then stop, so do not always complain and thank those who work to make the miner home available for us fans ,.
Unfortunately, the human being does not understand what it means to be a community, and help each other, greed is rampant in our Veneda centuries, so I'm not surprised at all, find me some other miner for windows that exceeds 52 h / s of 390x on a single zcash. I say it does not exist.

sorry for my english.

google translador rulezzz Grin

You are missing the point.
Claymore is using his good reputation (because of his other good miners) and he is stealing, and rebranding someone else's code.
It makes no difference if there is no other Windows miner at the moment (genoil called his own miner "a piece of shit"). You are still paying 2.5% of your hardware and electricity bill for a global replace and a compilation... to someone who admitted that he stole the code when he was caught...

And do have a look some posts before... some are reporting some "strange" behavior of his miner

marvykkio

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

I understand that claymore has used some of the code to another developer, but it seems exaggerated to make a controversy and point the finger at a person, I remind you that if there were no developers we could go to extract money with crappy programs that create , not optimized, then I remember, and also the fastest miner that there is at this moment, I have not tried the silent miner, but I tried just to Genoil, I get 25 hs per card, while I get claymore 52 per card, then I saw that claymore and the only updates its miner, others do 1 max 2 updates and then stop, so do not always complain and thank those who work to make the miner home available for us fans ,.
Unfortunately, the human being does not understand what it means to be a community, and help each other, greed is rampant in our Veneda centuries, so I'm not surprised at all, find me some other miner for windows that exceeds 52 h / s of 390x on a single zcash. I say it does not exist.

sorry for my english.

google translador rulezzz Grin

Topic: Claymore's ZCash/BTG AMD GPU Miner v12.6 (Windows/Linux) - page 707. (Read 3839391 times)