Topic: CLEAR guide to red trust for EXTORTION and BLACKMAIL according to DT members. - page 2. (Read 635 times)

Looks like MORE ad hominem cowardly tactics to avoid tackling the central points made in the initial post.

Thanks for summoning foxy. He was crucial in proving ALICE was a blackmailing extortionist scumbag and poor old bob the innocent...

His not-based-on -reasoning based opinions are always welcome. 

I think the OP is suffering from "the sockpuppet who cried wolf too many times" syndrome. There is no one left who could be bothered to read his shit and/or to give a fuck (except Foxpup, who always does).

many of us tried with OP... always ends up in the same spiral of madness, the OP loves it though - hence why most of us have it on ignore now.

you on the other-hand, well Bob I could chat with you all day!

I'm glad you at least realize your limitations and use.

Now either tackle the points in the initial post or fuck off.  Tired of low function DT feltching servile scum trying to derail the thread with their groundless speculations that are not even relevant or on topic.

Bring some substance imbecile or have your posts torn to pieces like the fragile garbage and derailing net negative trash they are.

I have no care as to what you think, you piece of servile dirt.  Have you got that now.

PROVE that we are bad actors OR ELSE fuck back off under your rock. Sounds like a bunch of bias moronic speculation from a fucking imbecile.

Now when you have finished with your gay fantasies and dreams about getting dun in da ass (likely never happens without payment)

You have no experience here. Never heard of you before because you are a non achieving  loser on welfare.

This poor wretch defines..

 Those that clearly present undeniable observable instances of scamming, scammer supporting, willing scam facilitating and clear double standards = Those that cry the most

Yeah those people presenting clear evidence of DT wrong doing = the bad guys.

Keep taking your meds filth bag.

@suchmoron our fav lurker/stalker

Stop hiding and get out here fatso and debate the initial post. Is the other idiot one of your alts or something. Seems to be taking the same play here. A bunch of zero content speculation and garbage that just falls to pieces when you ask for any EVIDENCE or PROOF.


Notice how this thread is getting DERAILED again by those that will NOT DARE debate the points in the initial post.

Oh no, you took away the OP's ability to make up a nickname for you, which is something he takes very seriously and puts a lot of effort in. This is bound to cause another wall of text.

It's a reputation based thread disguised (poorly) as a 'guide'.

Oh really, let me get some quotes here for you then to explain and tell us how this is NOT anywhere near as bad as scenario 1-3 above.

This will be fun.













Hmm so all of that is NOT blackmail/extortion  but scenarios 1-3 are blackmail/extortion.

LOL  you have turned a thread which started to be a LEGAL combined effort to get funds back for everyone INTO a thread where you buy the debts for 1 satoshi and then EXTORT the debtor to pay YOU back and if he does then WHAT YOU WILL NOT GIVE THE DOX to the investigators???

SO if you get paid their money you will not turn over his information to the investigators??

WTF this is extortion for your own clear selfish financial reward you scamming little wretch.

And yet you and the ENTIRE DT say that if alice has her phone stolen by bob and alice says to bob  " give my phone back bob or I will report you to the police"  or " give my phone back bob or I will tell other people you have stolen my phone"

THEN SHE IS A BLACKMAILER AND EXTORTIONIST??

hahahah default trust - the most shady bunch of cunts in the entire universe.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/analogy-let-me-see-who-says-what-open-challenge-mods-and-theymos-welcome-5123646

Love how that scumbag scammer supporter steamtyme ( fellow dt mutual inclusion and merit cycler with tman and chipmixer spammer) is confirming in the above thread that ALICE is a blackmailer for making tit for tat threats but in this thread  https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53226032

and later in that thread that these are NOT Threats tman is making and it is not blackmail or extortion.

Sounds a bit like what tman and lauda were working on here

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

This is how these double standards enforcing scammers are still entrenched in DT. They simply ensure their ardent scammer supporting pals are in DT with them to protect them and push through their double standards unhindered.

If that does not work then they roll out front man suchmoron to derail or just make a fool of her fat self to try and slobber out a lot of garbage that falls to bits with any probing.  Before it runs away crying we are back on ignore for being too crazy and nasty.


Where is SS... this is going to come down to a reversing the meaning of words to their opposite defense I think haha

cant believe I am answering this but...

I bought a debt, I can chose how to pursue that debt however I shall chose
I did not say I would publicly dox the user in question just that I would get his dox
I am still buying his debt.

back on ignore cunty.

NO because it is not a reputation based thread.

It is a clear guide for people to use when determining BLACKMAIL or EXTORTION as per DT actions/opinions.

More scenarios can be added as we go along.

Whos reputation would it be under?? the entire boards reputation as we add more examples of BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION that deserve red trust and flagging.

Why don't we move all those " MY TRIP TO LEGENDARY" to reputation they are not even system wide/ board wide applicable they are merely an account of one persons asslicking journey. Pulling themselves along the gutter by their tongues toward chipmixer riches LOL

Actually most of the crap here in meta is far LESS meta board material than this clear guide and chance for DT members to give their clear insight into BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION with regards negative trust and flagging.

Got it now?

Where is YOGG that other scammers supporting scum sucker to give tman red trust for blackmail and extortion.??  Let's hear his bullshit explanation of why he is not going to give his DT mutual include, merit cycling pal and fortunejack spammer a negative trust now??

Can you please move this to the Reputation section, where it belongs?

LOL what an off topic bunch of adhominem speculative derailing garbage.

Sorry, pointing out clear and undeniable double standards and your pals undeniable scamming and YOUR OWN scammer supporting does not indicated PROOF of instability or being a lunatic.

Looks just like some kind of ad hominem attack to derail the thread and avoid tackling the clear double standards.

Stand behind your low functioning spew moron. Where is the PROOF in the initial post ?? NOWHERE that is where.

You clearly supported scammers and on top of that tried your best to get a real legend banned.  Then wonder why some people may QUESTION your actions here. LOL  Then PRETEND the member attacked you for saying he should not have red trust haha

Now here you are spamming chipmixer with your corrupt colluding scumbag pals.

NOW THEN which part of the initial post do you wish to debate or are you just going to hide behind your ad hominem attacks ??

Watch suchmoon run away or claim we are back on ignore for the 100th time.

Your posts are absolute garbage with zero substance that will stand up to scrutiny. If you are not self debunking, running away from your own challenges or just generally spewing moronic crap you are supporting scammers and trying to get real honest and useful members punished. Oh that is if you are not stabbing THEYMOS in the back claiming he is sneaky and heavy handed by asking you to exclude a proven scammer and trust abuser from default trust.

Now back on topic please we are debating here BLACKMAIL and EXTORTION as clearly described in the initial post.

There's little doubt that you're an unstable lunatic and this thread is just more proof of that.

Whether this deserves red trust is another question. I used to think it doesn't but that didn't stop you from attacking me for that too, so it's quite plausible that some users consider your mental issues "high risk".

For those wondering what qualifies as extortion and blackmail according to DT members. I will provide a few handy scenarios.


SCENARIO 1

1. cryptohunter was attacked in his own thread by LAUDA who randomly claimed cryptohunter was a liar. Cryptohunter asks lauda to present the evidence of the LIES. Lauda refuses.

Lauda then comes and repeats the accusations that cryptohunter is a liar. Cryptohunter says produce the evidence of the lies. Lauda refuses and simply states it again. Cryptohunter then says if you call me a liar again without evidence we will encourage people to review your own post history and they will see who is the liar here.

BOOM _ BLACKMAIL/EXTORTION  Lauda gives CH red trust.

DT members agree.



SCENARIO 2

2. cryptohunter presents quotes of laudas post histories where he lied.

Tman comes along and claims cryptohunter  has blackmailed and extorted lauda and gives CH more red trust.

Cryptohunter says to TMAN - you can not give red trust for presenting a facts based post.

Tman replies " I can I will and I just have"

BOOM _ BLACKMAIL/EXTORTION  TMAN gives CH red trust.

DT members agree.


SCENARIO 3

3. Cryptohunter tells Tman to remove the trust abuse (that he has clearly admitted he has given red trust for a FACTS based post) or else he will be sure to make sure people know this was clearly TRUST ABUSE.

YOGG comes along and BOOM CLAIMS THIS IS BLACKMAIL AND EXTORTION and gives cryptohunter red trust.

Cryptohunter say to yogg this is like someone stealing your phone and you telling them to return it or else you will report them to the police.

Yogg says yes that would be extortion and be wrong.


ALL DT agrees with this and all confirm the red trust is fine and deserving.  Here we see steamtyme ( a tman asslicker) agreeing that ALICE telling bob to return her phone or she will call the cops is BLACKMAIL/EXTORTION




NOW WHAT HAPPENS??  start reading here

SCENARIO 4 - the non threatening, non blackmailing, non extortion totally fine and okay way to do things

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53220286

TMAN comes in and buys a "debt" from LoyceV for 1 satoshi. Then straight away starts threatening to DOXX or seems to be implying in this thread that he will do far more to the " apparent" debtor that dox him. TMan says if this "apparent" debtor does not pay him $650 dollars in a few days he will dox him, and some other threats in PM to him and now seems to be making all kinds of threats.

I mean not only is this clearly financially motivated like his other extortion https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/laudatmanminifrijironmarvel2owlcatz-extortion-attempt-1764757

It is totally selfish, I mean he is claiming he will release the dox if he does not get HIS 1 satoshi to $650 bucks convertion ... so what he will not turn this information over if he is paid $650?? what about the other fucking people that were " apparently" scammed or not paid out??

That threat started as an attempt at a legal combined effort to get funds back for everyone. Now tman says he will buy all the debts and will extort the guy to paying him back?? actually I forgot...those are not threats, not blackmail and not extortion because it is DT member and different rules apply to them. DOUBLE STANDARDS.


This is BULLSHIT they use the trust system to punish those that whistle blow on their scamming and prior extorting, by claiming you are extorting them LOL then they go around REALLY extorting people for clear selfishly motivated financial gain.

WHAT IS WORSE is the scumbags like steamtyme and the other scammer supporters that have WEASELED their way on to DT with the COMPLIMENTARY CHIPMIXER supporting and colluding with them to fully entrench them on default trust. All enabled, sanctioned and rewarded by the bogus merit=trust system.


So the guide to defining Extortion and blackmail with regards red trust is clear.

You can not say you will encourage people to review a persons post history (who falsely accuses you of lying over and over) to find out the truth about them ..that = EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL

You can not say you will make sure people know the truth that a DT member admitted trust abusing your facts based post if they do not remove that trust abuse = EXTORTION AND BLACKMAIL

You can say you will dox people and PM them other threats unless they pay $650 bucks for something you just bought for 1 satoshi = NOT a threat, NOT extortion nor blackmail.

Or if you get caught making threats unless people pay you money or btc ... you always have the old " under cover agents" get out.
Or if that does not work call in SS for the reverse the meaning of words defense.

More guides will be produces as and when we feel the need to keep the board updated with the latest views and attitudes of our honest and upstanding DT members.