Pages:
Author

Topic: closed - page 57. (Read 164739 times)

hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
Spanish Bitcoin trader
April 05, 2013, 01:19:01 PM
Supposedly, they just created a Twitter account. https://twitter.com/Vircurex

Only tweet says they are working on it.
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
April 05, 2013, 01:17:15 PM
Are the wallets kept on the same server?
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
April 05, 2013, 01:13:27 PM
You really should reduce the BTC withdrawal fee. The fee just forces people to leave BTC on the exchange and increases the risks
I second this.  I would withdraw BTC every time I used vircurex if the withdraw fee wasn't so high (over 1 USD).
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
April 05, 2013, 12:53:39 PM
Doing a trace route I can see that there's a routing loop...  So maybe your server is up but unreachable...

No, that is a VPS panel
legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
April 05, 2013, 12:49:38 PM
As nice as being updated is.....a little more specification would be even better.  "system is down"  isn't really reassuring if you know what I mean.


BTC-E was down at the same time and we know GOX has been suffering too. It's DDOS, plain and simple and fucking sucks. :-(
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
Spanish Bitcoin trader
April 05, 2013, 12:48:52 PM
How dangerous is this?
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
April 05, 2013, 12:32:49 PM
Doing a trace route I can see that there's a routing loop...  So maybe your server is up but unreachable...
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
April 05, 2013, 12:31:09 PM
You really should reduce the BTC withdrawal fee. The fee just forces people to leave BTC on the exchange and increases the risks
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
April 05, 2013, 12:13:46 PM
We have contacted the datacenter provider to investigate why the server won't boot up. Their response isn't quite as fast as we would wish it to be.
hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 501
April 05, 2013, 12:03:57 PM
As nice as being updated is.....a little more specification would be even better.  "system is down"  isn't really reassuring if you know what I mean.

hero member
Activity: 697
Merit: 501
April 05, 2013, 11:59:22 AM
Thanks for the quick post.  I hope you can restore the system as quickly as you informed us there was a problem.  Got my fingers crossed.

hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
April 05, 2013, 11:54:11 AM
System is down, we are working on it.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
April 04, 2013, 02:53:08 PM
How long does it take to verify TRC deposits?
I sent some to my deposit address from 2 hours+ and still it does not appear in my account.

Does it say pending deposit on your Accounts page?  It'll usually display there for other coins and #/# blocks till confirmation.

Perhaps TRC is different?

OK. Now I see it as: "Incoming funds"
with   Confirmations:  1 / 10
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
April 04, 2013, 02:41:08 PM
How long does it take to verify TRC deposits?
I sent some to my deposit address from 2 hours+ and still it does not appear in my account.

Does it say pending deposit on your Accounts page?  It'll usually display there for other coins and #/# blocks till confirmation.

Perhaps TRC is different?
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
April 04, 2013, 02:35:29 PM
How long does it take to verify TRC deposits?
I sent some to my deposit address from 2 hours+ and still it does not appear in my account.
legendary
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
April 04, 2013, 01:44:06 PM
I can't log in right now. Problems?

It's slow, but I've been logged in for hours...

PM me to subscribe to my alt coin investment newsletter starting later this month...

I'll teach you how I turned $100 into $14,000 over the past 6 months!!!

https://vircurex.com/welcome/index?referral_id=801-154

You'll wanna register with Vircurex who made it all possible... referral appreciated!
newbie
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
April 04, 2013, 01:35:51 PM
I can't log in right now. Problems?
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
April 03, 2013, 09:09:04 PM
The alternative would be not to credit any deposits lower than a specified threshhold, e.g.  < 0.01 BTC   Thus anyone sending less will not get the coins credited.  Best even, some sort of reorg function on the wallet.
Good point. There are patches around to that stops dust transactions from being used in coin selection.
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
April 03, 2013, 09:01:07 PM
The alternative would be not to credit any deposits lower than a specified threshhold, e.g.  < 0.01 BTC   Thus anyone sending less will not get the coins credited.  Best even, some sort of reorg function on the wallet.

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1005
April 03, 2013, 08:57:43 PM
#99
Since we added the optional fee to speed up network processing, we pay redicilous amounts of fees. The reason is that we have tons of tiny deposits (probably P2P mining or other mining results).   These thousands of small transactions are are driving the fees up.
Same issue existed in my exchange, it's crazy. Some people do many small deposits direct from mining pools for less than 0.0001 coins and it fragments the wallet resulting in high fees for withdrawals which the exchange has to eat. It'd be nice if the various coins had an API that worked like:

Code:
foocoind sendtoaddress 1X9999 25 0.01

Where 0.01 is the fee you want to pay. If that fee is too small for the coind's default it can fail and return the actual fee required. You can then retry the command with the new fee. This would allow finding out the fee to pass on to the user.
Pages:
Jump to: