Pages:
Author

Topic: [CLOSED] BTCMine - ZERO fee mining pool (LP, SSL, JSON API, P2SH) - page 20. (Read 171605 times)

hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
Maybe, but it blocks 500 spammers...and you. If I were you, I would complain to the data center about getting a bad IP address Smiley I am certainly not going to accept 500 more spams just to get your mail, sorry.
I understand your point. I recommend just use gmail.
Spamhaus block to much ipv4 blocks.
They just ignore small hostings and reject all official requests from data center.
If hosting offer shared or vps services they always may hammered by dumb spammers, but this not mean what someone should mark whole IP subnet as BAD.
IPv4 subnets already all reserved or sold, and replace it with new not possible (or not cheap) even for big hosting company.
There is no western based hostings who allow spam operations (for several years). All email spam now from botnets (home user pc's).

They should just make it legal to shoot spammers, botnet herders, virus writers and people like that. Cheesy
We should start from politics, dictators and and people like that...  Smiley
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
Does BTCMine accept payouts to Mybitcoin.com address's?
Can someone confirm please.
Thanks.

This is possible, but I do not recommend use any such addresses for direct transfers from pool.
Use your own bitcoin address.

hero member
Activity: 927
Merit: 1000
฿itcoin ฿itcoin ฿itcoin
Does BTCMine accept payouts to Mybitcoin.com address's?
Can someone confirm please.

Thanks.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Maybe, but it blocks 500 spammers...and you. If I were you, I would complain to the data center about getting a bad IP address Smiley I am certainly not going to accept 500 more spams just to get your mail, sorry.
I understand your point. I recommend just use gmail.
Spamhaus block to much ipv4 blocks.
They just ignore small hostings and reject all official requests from data center.
If hosting offer shared or vps services they always may hammered by dumb spammers, but this not mean what someone should mark whole IP subnet as BAD.
IPv4 subnets already all reserved or sold, and replace it with new not possible (or not cheap) even for big hosting company.
There is no western based hostings who allow spam operations (for several years). All email spam now from botnets (home user pc's).

They should just make it legal to shoot spammers, botnet herders, virus writers and people like that. Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
Maybe, but it blocks 500 spammers...and you. If I were you, I would complain to the data center about getting a bad IP address Smiley I am certainly not going to accept 500 more spams just to get your mail, sorry.
I understand your point. I recommend just use gmail.
Spamhaus block to much ipv4 blocks.
They just ignore small hostings and reject all official requests from data center.
If hosting offer shared or vps services they always may hammered by dumb spammers, but this not mean what someone should mark whole IP subnet as BAD.
IPv4 subnets already all reserved or sold, and replace it with new not possible (or not cheap) even for big hosting company.
There is no western based hostings who allow spam operations (for several years). All email spam now from botnets (home user pc's).




newbie
Activity: 40
Merit: 0
I discovered that I had ~155 stale shares after 3700 submitted (4.1%).
Seeing this as well, looks like long polling is not working properly again. I'm seeing invalid shares being submitted for up to 2 minutes in a row every time the work changes. Switching to a different pool for now.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
OK, well if you aren't going to take it seriously, you can forget my registration. Good luck with your pool.
Why I should take it seriously?
Probably some one said you what spamhaus honest and adequate service?
Ok, I told you: spamhaus service - not adequate and not reliably.
It's a old and boring story about small hosting wars (>5 YEARS OLD).

Maybe, but it blocks 500 spammers...and you. If I were you, I would complain to the data center about getting a bad IP address Smiley I am certainly not going to accept 500 more spams just to get your mail, sorry.
legendary
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1001
Anybody getting a grip load of stale shares? I'm at 1.4% stale shares with around 6000 shares submitted.  Huh
I switch to btcmine last night when Deepbit was down, but I switched back this morning when I discovered that I had ~155 stale shares after 3700 submitted (4.1%). So far I have 2 stale shares after about 1100 submitted on Deepbit. I use the guiminer.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Anybody getting a grip load of stale shares? I'm at 1.4% stale shares with around 6000 shares submitted.  Huh

What miner software do you use?
Do you use proxy or TOR?


I use Guiminer

Don't use any proxies or TOR (what's TOR?)
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
Anybody getting a grip load of stale shares? I'm at 1.4% stale shares with around 6000 shares submitted.  Huh

What miner software do you use?
Do you use proxy or TOR?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Anybody getting a grip load of stale shares? I'm at 1.4% stale shares with around 6000 shares submitted.  Huh
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
OK, well if you aren't going to take it seriously, you can forget my registration. Good luck with your pool.
Why I should take it seriously?
Probably some one said you what spamhaus honest and adequate service?
Ok, I told you: spamhaus service - not adequate and not reliably.
It's a old and boring story about small hosting wars (>5 YEARS OLD).

hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
OK, well if you aren't going to take it seriously, you can forget my registration. Good luck with your pool.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
BTCDig - mining pool
Hi, you need a new mail server NOW. Your server IP address is on spam blacklists.

Code:
May 30 04:41:45 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: connect from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]
May 30 04:41:46 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [88.214.194.226] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL67772; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo=
May 30 04:41:46 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: disconnect from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]

Who cares about spamhaus.org dumb idiots... probably only lazy admins who use this stupid service.
Just use gmail for registration.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hi, you need a new mail server NOW. Your server IP address is on spam blacklists.

Code:
May 30 04:41:45 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: connect from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]
May 30 04:41:46 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [88.214.194.226] blocked using zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL67772; from= to= proto=ESMTP helo=
May 30 04:41:46 citadel postfix/smtpd[20194]: disconnect from btc.btcmine.com[88.214.194.226]
full member
Activity: 188
Merit: 100
My miners are showing up as being down on the BTC website, but they're all up. Everything is fine, they are hashing away, and I'm not showing any problems in their logs.

Anyone else having this problem?

Me too at the moment

It's internal daemon crash, restarted.

Cool. Okay now I see a different problem, not to complain but just to notify you--There's a lot of rejected results right before each long poll "new work push". This is up to a dozen rejections in a row.

Is this because of the influx of new folks from deepbit? Is anyone else having this issue or is it just me?

Seeing the same thing here.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
My miners are showing up as being down on the BTC website, but they're all up. Everything is fine, they are hashing away, and I'm not showing any problems in their logs.

Anyone else having this problem?

Me too at the moment

It's internal daemon crash, restarted.

Cool. Okay now I see a different problem, not to complain but just to notify you--There's a lot of rejected results right before each long poll "new work push". This is up to a dozen rejections in a row.

Is this because of the influx of new folks from deepbit? Is anyone else having this issue or is it just me?
member
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
The web server at https://btcmine.com/ is configured incorrectly. The issuer CA bundle is not being sent. This will be a problem for some browsers, but not others. Whoever provided you with the certificate should have provided a CA bundle, and you should configure your web server to send it along with your site's certificate.

I will look on to this. But right now I see problem only in one browser - Firefox 4.

Agreed. 

It has had an update recently and the problem remains suggesting that they either don't know about a rendering defect, or there isn't one [many renders are patched to work with incorrect HTML that worked before on previous versions of browsers ... but nobody wants that to continue forever]. Either way, Firefox is a pretty large percentage of the browser community, even on Linux and Macs (and without looking, I am sure *BSD as well ... after all, the current MacOS is based on the code base of FreeBSD 3.x ... one of their worst releases oddly enough -- the irony!).  There are no doubt ports for many UNIX variants. 

I will install latest version of Firefox 3 on my other Windows 7 mining box [my Wife has her XP laptop locked or I would just the installation there] and see if it is specific to version 4.

If the fix is simple, it would be greatly appreciated.  Otherwise, it really isn't that big of a deal for the time being.  I use Chrome quite often for bitcoin related sites which all open when I launch the browser so that I can get to things fast and that avoids me having to have to do that with my primary browser which is Firefox 4 as that would be quite annoying watching about 6 tabs load at once on startup and a bit more slowly due to add-ins.  Smiley

EDIT:  Just tried with Firefox 3 and the site shows up just fine.  I may just go back to using Firefox 3 on my machine until they get Firefox 4 straightened out (I would suspect adding HTML5 support and improving rendering performance introduced a defect that they have not yet found or fixed).

I submitted a support question to Mozilla to take a look at this since it seems completely isolated to their browser and it appears it is having trouble rendering your stylesheet.

Quote
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Testing
Welp, all the pools are getting hit

I decided to hop on BTC mine with 3.4 Ghs... Hopefully it stays up. I'm not watching it like a hawk, like I was last week, I dont have time to this week Sad
Pages:
Jump to: