[Closed] Mass bounty abuse | Bitcointalksearch.org

Iccang161096

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 100

Quote from: icopress on November 03, 2020, 02:57:24 AM

Quote from: Iccang161096 on November 03, 2020, 02:22:29 AM

I dont understand your logic. So do you think if someone send you message with same day you said they are cheater? Are you kidding? IT'S NOT A PROOF BRO..

Quote from: nutildah on November 03, 2020, 02:21:20 AM

Its because your old trust references are showing up as Default Trust now. You could very well be right about your connections here, but without blockchain or social media connections its pretty flimsy, and similar last active times isn't really a good enough reason by itself to leave a red tag. If you look at coinlocket's trust left for tarable before yours, you'll see they considered leaving red but changed it to neutral based on a similar conclusion.

This report presents data on the participation of Boss95rnd, Onika84, iccang161096 accounts in one bounty campaign (accounts are linked by transactions). Accounts use an intermediate address, and then transfer tokens to the main one, (the owner of the main address has a trust rating of -9).

0x400E2B1817d020094d... - Onika84 →
0x55f0F689A39D17ed9d... - iccang161096 → 0x6c7a64e816.... → 0x8420537853d.. jamalaezaz, https://archive.is/26uJR
0xb1AC9db0d6a1eC291F... - Boss95rnd →

So why if someone joined same bounty campaign? Are the bounty campaign for just one person?

And what's is this "https://archive.is/26uJR"? That's dev address. So why? You think we can recieve 250Mil DRONE Token before bounty distributions? And you know who Jamalaesaz?

Please if you wanna give us negative trust, make a more proof.

Iccang161096

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 100

Quote from: icopress on November 03, 2020, 02:57:24 AM

Quote from: Iccang161096 on November 03, 2020, 02:22:29 AM

I dont understand your logic. So do you think if someone send you message with same day you said they are cheater? Are you kidding? IT'S NOT A PROOF BRO..

Quote from: nutildah on November 03, 2020, 02:21:20 AM

Its because your old trust references are showing up as Default Trust now. You could very well be right about your connections here, but without blockchain or social media connections its pretty flimsy, and similar last active times isn't really a good enough reason by itself to leave a red tag. If you look at coinlocket's trust left for tarable before yours, you'll see they considered leaving red but changed it to neutral based on a similar conclusion.

This report presents data on the participation of Boss95rnd, Onika84, iccang161096 accounts in one bounty campaign (accounts are linked by transactions). Accounts use an intermediate address, and then transfer tokens to the main one, (the owner of the main address has a trust rating of -9).

0x400E2B1817d020094d... - Onika84 →
0x55f0F689A39D17ed9d... - iccang161096 → 0x6c7a64e816.... → 0x8420537853d.. jamalaezaz, https://archive.is/26uJR
0xb1AC9db0d6a1eC291F... - Boss95rnd →

Im already PM you
Here my proof of all
"I got the problem now why im have same txh hash with their people

The dev send 2x reward for linkedin campaign so I send back to the dev

Please see this image what I how many I send back to the dev
Image: https://imgur.com/a/ZNDm9zW

And you can see the spreadsheets here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Xza-Zb4eAJxkukZOri7pbUHpv76oLpCcBgBeTibmpIc/edit#gid=1920017074

And here my address so you can see the transactions "how many I send" : https://etherscan.io/token/0x131f193692b5cce8c87d12ff4f7aa1d4e1668f1e?a=0x55f0f689a39d17ed9db4512b2c4344739827547e

Please see all my proof
I think it's already clear"

PLEASE SEE!!

Once again. Do you know how many allocations reward DRONE for DEEP AERO bounty?? If you said this my also my address, How can I recieve 250Mil DRONE token?? How? How can I'm recieve before bounty distributed??

Please see my proof : https://imgur.com/a/p9l1JpQ

Im waiting your reply

icopress

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 5874

light_warrior ... 🕯️

Quote from: Iccang161096 on November 03, 2020, 02:22:29 AM

I dont understand your logic. So do you think if someone send you message with same day you said they are cheater? Are you kidding? IT'S NOT A PROOF BRO..

Quote from: nutildah on November 03, 2020, 02:21:20 AM

Its because your old trust references are showing up as Default Trust now. You could very well be right about your connections here, but without blockchain or social media connections its pretty flimsy, and similar last active times isn't really a good enough reason by itself to leave a red tag. If you look at coinlocket's trust left for tarable before yours, you'll see they considered leaving red but changed it to neutral based on a similar conclusion.

This report presents data on the participation of Boss95rnd, Onika84, iccang161096 accounts in one bounty campaign (accounts are linked by transactions). Accounts use an intermediate address, and then transfer tokens to the main one, (the owner of the main address has a trust rating of -9).

0x400E2B1817d020094d... - Onika84 →
0x55f0F689A39D17ed9d... - iccang161096 → 0x6c7a64e816.... → 0x8420537853d.. jamalaezaz, https://archive.is/26uJR
0xb1AC9db0d6a1eC291F... - Boss95rnd →

Iccang161096

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 100

Quote from: icopress on November 02, 2020, 11:57:06 PM

This is ridiculous ... Considering that yesterday three users wrote to me in a PM, whose names appear in this list. (Users who haven't published anything for about a year or two).

I dont understand your logic. So do you think if someone send you message with same day you said they are cheater? Are you kidding? IT'S NOT A PROOF BRO..

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: icopress on November 02, 2020, 11:57:06 PM

This is ridiculous ... Considering that yesterday three users wrote to me in a PM, whose names appear in this list. (Users who haven't published anything for about a year or two).

Its because your old trust references are showing up as Default Trust now. You could very well be right about your connections here, but without blockchain or social media connections its pretty flimsy, and similar last active times isn't really a good enough reason by itself to leave a red tag. If you look at coinlocket's trust left for tarable before yours, you'll see they considered leaving red but changed it to neutral based on a similar conclusion.

Iccang161096

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 100

Why you didnt reply my message? What's your proof? It's not totally a proof. Your proof too low
Sorry for my english. Are you hungry bro?

Im already sent you a PM about why I have same transactions with 3 accounts you said.. Please take a look, are you blind bro? Or you just hungry? Please see all my appeal.
Or just wait I will send here so public can see

icopress

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 5874

light_warrior ... 🕯️

This is ridiculous ... Considering that yesterday three users wrote to me in a PM, whose names appear in this list. (Users who haven't published anything for about a year or two).

So much time has passed, and I do not remember under what circumstances I did this report.

But the fact is, I would never waste time on these accounts if I didn't have enough evidence, (2 years ago). And I changed my feedback to neutral, as I could not find information in my records about the transactions linking these 4 accounts. I will return Neg feedback if I find it.

The problem is that campaign managers are oblivious to neutral feedback, and I'm not sure if it's worth changing.

I am talking about the totality of all these facts, without considering them separately.

1. The screenshot was taken about a few months after Tarable took part in the bounty campaign we're talking about, (that is, these four accounts were seen in two bounty campaigns).
2. Also, all 4 accounts were registered on the forum with a very short interval.
3. Last Active: (Almost synchronous online).
4. All four accounts have a posting history in the same local section, Altcoins (Bahasa Indonesia).
5. Tarable and these three other accounts are perfect examples of Bump Spammer/Shitposter, (a lot of one-liners posts).

tarable

full member

Activity: 1258

Merit: 104

Quote from: nutildah on November 02, 2020, 11:12:36 PM

I reviewed the connection and I don't think it deserves a negative rating.

There's a chance the first two accounts are connected (tarable and MonaLeeTracy) based on the timing and place of token withdrawal, but that's not enough to connect two accounts as being alts, IMO.

I have repeatedly said that I don't know the three of them, including MonaLeeTracy, I don't blame anyone here, it's just that I say that professionalism must always be prioritized, especially when it comes to accusing other people who can tarnish their names.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: tarable on November 02, 2020, 09:41:10 PM

Hello sir, icopress has accused me with evidence that is not accurate at all and even it is false evidence because basically I was never associated with the three people he accuses, sir can fully check on the exposure of the wallet made by icopress, so I just want a fairness here, because this is concerned with a reputation he should give the right one not the fake

I reviewed the connection and I don't think it deserves a negative rating.

There's a chance the first two accounts are connected (tarable and MonaLeeTracy) based on the timing and place of token withdrawal, but that's not enough to connect two accounts as being alts, IMO.

@icopress can you please shed some light on your conclusion here?

tarable

full member

Activity: 1258

Merit: 104

Quote from: YOSHIE on October 02, 2020, 04:30:42 AM

Hello @icopress, I am not replying to your PM anymore, I will tell you directly here, thread.

Sometimes people are very difficult to accept something that you think is true, I myself rarely connect Alt doing Tx: transactions, difficult for other members to accept, they are connected to each other.

I reviewed some of the ETH addresses used by Alt that you published, however, some are connected and some are not, I only see the addresses used, not entered into transactions.
Therefore, if you want to post on: Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2020 Q4) re-prove about them connected, the rules there must use the existing form and include evidence like other members do it, so that the other members could judge that they were indeed a cheating and connected Alt.
I think it's better, no problem, if you want to do it there.

Or create a new thread about Alt Cheating on Reputation, by proving that they are Alt cheating in the Bounty campaign, I mean other members who see faster understand what you did right.

Hello sir, icopress has accused me with evidence that is not accurate at all and even it is false evidence because basically I was never associated with the three people he accuses, sir can fully check on the exposure of the wallet made by icopress, so I just want a fairness here, because this is concerned with a reputation he should give the right one not the fake

tarable

full member

Activity: 1258

Merit: 104

Quote from: lovesmayfamilis on November 02, 2020, 09:04:54 AM

icopress ,I would also like to see a more detailed description of the relationship between all accounts. Since this is done in this thread.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574

What should I understand from this picture.

I just want justice here, because basically I don't know all of them and I've never had any contact with all of them, so is there no sanction or punishment for people who wrongly accuse other people, because this concerns someone's good name and reputation, I hope there are still people who think professionally here.

lovesmayfamilis

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 4265

✿♥‿♥✿

icopress ,I would also like to see a more detailed description of the relationship between all accounts. Since this is done in this thread.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/known-alts-of-any-one-a-user-generated-list-mk-iii-2021-q2-2544574

What should I understand from this picture.

tarable

full member

Activity: 1258

Merit: 104

The accusations from icopress against me are completely untrue and false, because basically I don't know these three people and the wallet I used was never connected to the wallet they were using at that time, so you have provided false evidence in this matter, so I just wish you to remove redtrust from my account.

Note: please provide proper evidence as well as a really strong reason in this case, because it concerns an individual's reputation

Timelord2067

legendary

Activity: 3696

Merit: 2219

💲🏎️💨🚓

Quote from: YOSHIE on October 02, 2020, 04:30:42 AM

...
Therefore, if you want to post on: Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2020 Q4) re-prove about them connected, the rules there must use the existing form and include evidence like other members do it, so that the other members could judge that they were indeed a cheating and connected Alt.
...

I'd rather (they) didn't...

I've only just seen this thread for the first time and I can't follow what the "proof" is, I'd rather be walked through this thread rather than it spill over into the Known Alts thread (not unless there was some flow to the evidence that I can't see) ?? (I don't investigate ETH transactions, so I am not in a position to make a judgement call on such matters).

... but if you do feel the need, please use the Submission Form which might help explain the connections etc.

Thanks.

YOSHIE

legendary

Activity: 2128

Merit: 1775

Hello @icopress, I am not replying to your PM anymore, I will tell you directly here, thread.

Sometimes people are very difficult to accept something that you think is true, I myself rarely connect Alt doing Tx: transactions, difficult for other members to accept, they are connected to each other.

I reviewed some of the ETH addresses used by Alt that you published, however, some are connected and some are not, I only see the addresses used, not entered into transactions.
Therefore, if you want to post on: Topic: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2020 Q4) re-prove about them connected, the rules there must use the existing form and include evidence like other members do it, so that the other members could judge that they were indeed a cheating and connected Alt.
I think it's better, no problem, if you want to do it there.

Or create a new thread about Alt Cheating on Reputation, by proving that they are Alt cheating in the Bounty campaign, I mean other members who see faster understand what you did right.

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: Patatas on March 22, 2019, 02:23:43 PM

Damn did he participate in an entire bounty campaign by himself? I guess that is even more than the number of participants are accepted in a bounty campaign. Anyway, tagging those accounts will be a hell of a job for the DT members. Let's see who's ready to take up that challenge. Cheesy

Not really, I think some of them uses bots to join Idk how it is possible but one time I found one with 10000 accounts... yes 10k.

Also this one with 560 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/1-man-560-accounts-on-forum-millions-of-tokens-abused-4759763

And this one with 1000 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/the-scammer-guinness-world-record-on-bitcointalk-1-man-1000-accounts-150k-usd-4139632

Patatas

legendary

Activity: 1750

Merit: 1115

Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!

Damn did he participate in an entire bounty campaign by himself? I guess that is even more than the number of participants are accepted in a bounty campaign. Anyway, tagging those accounts will be a hell of a job for the DT members. Let's see who's ready to take up that challenge. Cheesy

Avirunes

legendary

Activity: 3094

Merit: 1472

Quote from: icopress on March 22, 2019, 01:32:24 PM

-snip-

Is it only 2 accounts or more? I guess Lauda asked for a list of High ranked accounts.

Lauda do have a point that tagging low ranked users won't lead to anything. They will still be able to register with new account and be at it again.

Maybe forcing bounty managers to lift up the minimum rank to be eligible to participate changes things?

I will look at this list this weekend. It's a very large sheet and list to process Shocked

icopress

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 5874

light_warrior ... 🕯️

Quote from: Lauda on March 21, 2019, 01:36:17 AM

Can you add another list in which users that have higher ranks/merits would be listed first? That would help a bit going through all of it.

These profiles correspond to the description.

Here are all the necessary links (TxHash , Archive Bounty) - https://telegra.ph/Bounty-abuser2-Alts-462517-877231-11-08
Linked accounts Bitcointalk: Landak, Ginsan

icopress

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 5874

light_warrior ... 🕯️

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on March 20, 2019, 04:41:30 PM

I am not the right person to evaluate blockchain evidence like this. I think pretty much any other DT member and a lot of other non-DT members are more qualified to validate your detective work here.

My pm/posts are usually addressed only to those participants who show common sense in this chaos. I create threads only when evidence related to Alt's cannot be disputed. (Txns, Etc.)

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on March 20, 2019, 04:41:30 PM

In general, I don't believe that at all but there's enough reasonable doubt (in my mind) such that I don't usually tag suspected bounty cheaters based on blockchain evidence.

How about the first example?
1. Alts - members of one bounty company.
2. Snapshot (identified Address with Bitcointalk profile).
3. Snapshot (transaction linking accounts + link to Txns).

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on March 20, 2019, 04:41:30 PM

I picked two random linked accounts from this list, and they weren't wearing a signature.

The lack of sig may be due to the fact that some accounts have already been connected with accounts from the "list of users Mk III" or "Smas", etc.

I don't think that in this example need more solid proofs.

Quote from: Vod on March 20, 2019, 09:33:23 PM

I'll trust The Pharmacist already did what I would do.

Well, then I'll go and spend another ....... hours fighting Alt's. Grin

Topic: [Closed] Mass bounty abuse (Read 889 times)