I am worried about this project. Are you guys still working on the software? Do you have a alpha version yet?
Someone here reminded me of the storagecoin guy. He talked and sounded like Storagecoin guy. I have a very bad feeling now.
Topic: Closed Thread - page 477. (Read 677685 times)
dont they already have btc from ipo?
1. From ipo
2. From Auction 1.1
3. From Auction 1.2, coz they sold much more stakes then announced
4. From selling 21 more stakes, I don't know where those came from
Although I have no problems with Auction 2.0, if people are willing to pay then why not.
But I don't see any reason to put puppets' stakes on NXT AE. It just doesn't make any sense at all. People saw NEM stakes and they want NODE stakes, but the situation it totally different.
dont they already have btc from ipo?
here's an idea, use additional stakes for bounties and such. everyone is happy if you do this
Too much greed will kill the whole project 
Hope you don´t do that!
Hope you don´t do that!
really unprofessional behavior in here, seems like moneygrab after moneygrab from this team, trying to stretch out this whole ipo way too long.
I read the distribution list was going to be finalized and investors had the time to send their account info till the 27th, one of the first posts after this date is this team trying to sell more stakes from empty spots on the list..
thats not how this is supposed to work...look at everyone's reaction, this stuff just makes everyone all feel like you guys are stringing everyone along for months..its almost shameful how you're trying to squeeze more btc out of it..
I read the distribution list was going to be finalized and investors had the time to send their account info till the 27th, one of the first posts after this date is this team trying to sell more stakes from empty spots on the list..
thats not how this is supposed to work...look at everyone's reaction, this stuff just makes everyone all feel like you guys are stringing everyone along for months..its almost shameful how you're trying to squeeze more btc out of it..
This is gettin out of hand! Auction after auction to just gather more btc to the devs ?
You had allready change the rules before, so maybe it is a time to listen the voice of the community and rather just share the coins with current stakeholders !
You had allready change the rules before, so maybe it is a time to listen the voice of the community and rather just share the coins with current stakeholders !
I have to agree with everyone, this second auction is very bad form. You should just increase the stakes.
This is not your first bad public relation blunder nor the second or third.
You seriously need to learn to stick with your original plan, even if it's not the most beneficial for you at the moment. In the long run it will be better for everyone.
I also hope someone from the community will pick up marketing and PR job for the coin after launch, because you really suck at this. No shame in it, there are very few people who can create a great coin, and very few who can successfully promote one. Those who are really good at both are almost nonexistent. So if you just great at coding, everything will be alright. Just find someone who is good at communicating.
This is not your first bad public relation blunder nor the second or third.
You seriously need to learn to stick with your original plan, even if it's not the most beneficial for you at the moment. In the long run it will be better for everyone.
I also hope someone from the community will pick up marketing and PR job for the coin after launch, because you really suck at this. No shame in it, there are very few people who can create a great coin, and very few who can successfully promote one. Those who are really good at both are almost nonexistent. So if you just great at coding, everything will be alright. Just find someone who is good at communicating.
This is unfair, share the coins from sockpuppetsstakes between the holder. You already get enough BTC from the auction.
Help us find sockpuppets?
We have not found not one, but already share stake
So you say, because you found the sockpuppet it is yours and you can sell it? Seriously?
This project is out of line.
Selling addiontally stakes 2 times, against the initial distribution plan. That suxxx.
After agreeing with the first auction, you should care more about your stakeholders. That´s like a punch in our faces.
Sure for the rude words but that puts me on tilt very hard.
Awfully sorry if my words were rude (?). Only tried to explain the difference between sockpuppet and buy-in.
Yeah I meant sorry. And I wasn´t speaking directly to you. It was towards the devs.
Sure for the rude words but that puts me on tilt very hard.
Awfully sorry if my words were rude (?). Only tried to explain the difference between sockpuppet and buy-in.
This is unfair, share the coins from sockpuppetsstakes between the holder. You already get enough BTC from the auction.
Help us find sockpuppets?
We have not found not one, but already share stake
This is unfair, share the coins from sockpuppetsstakes between the holder. You already get enough BTC from the auction.
You said sockpuppet's coins would be distributed amongst stakeholders...that plainly SUCKS man.
Where have I said?
Read community itself offers trading on NXT AE
You said sockpuppet's coins would be distributed amongst stakeholders...that plainly SUCKS man.
I saw there are multiple stakes for one person in the auction. If you allow one person to have multiple stakes in auction, how do you justify the disallowing the sock puppets which is virtually same as one person have multiple stakes.
Sockpuppet = different bitcointalk-accounts for same person to acquire multiple stakes early for free or for for couple of bucks,
no benefit for the project
Auctioning and other sales = totally different, bigger money involved which is used for development
benefit the project
I think it's totally fair to allow buy in more in addition to the one original stake.
I got my original stake almost for free like many others. But I bought second for 0.25btc. Big difference there. The second one is investment. And eventually some whales will have many full stakes anyhow when NODE hits the exchanges.
For what another auction?
People can buy this coin when it hits an exchange.
Last time the auction was for the devs, cause they needed the money.
But why another one?
Share the coins between the holders and stop changing your plans everytime you see a chance to get more money.
Sure for the rude words but that puts me on tilt very hard.
Will be sold only Suckpuppets. Unknown will be auctioned or AE NXT
Unknown how many will Suckpuppets
I saw there are multiple stakes for one person in the auction. If you allow one person to have multiple stakes in auction, how do you justify the disallowing the sock puppets which is virtually same as one person have multiple stakes.
Sockpuppet = different bitcointalk-accounts for same person to acquire multiple stakes early for free or for for couple of bucks,
no benefit for the project
Auctioning and other sales = totally different, bigger money involved which is used for development
benefit the project
I think it's totally fair to allow buy in more in addition to the one original stake.
I got my original stake almost for free like many others. But I bought second for 0.25btc. Big difference there. The second one is investment. And eventually some whales will have many full stakes anyhow when NODE hits the exchanges.
For what another auction?
People can buy this coin when it hits an exchange.
Last time the auction was for the devs, cause they needed the money.
But why another one?
Share the coins between the holders and stop changing your plans everytime you see a chance to get more money.
Sure for the rude words but that puts me on tilt very hard.
how much stake will be worth on ae??
i also vote for nxt-assett, best and most comfortable way
I vote NXT AE
i also vote for nxt-assett, best and most comfortable way
Jump to: