Topic: Closed Thread - page 501. (Read 677685 times)

waiting more news ....

There are going to come out very soon 4 coins built from scratch, Simcoin, Next lite coin, Sky coin and NEM.

Now my question is this? whoever coin is release the last will have last chance to succeed? why Next lite would be better of all these coin ? the competition is tough and who will be number 1 out of these 4 coins that will come out roughly at the same time

anon136 is very nice.
I have traded with him several times.

OK, thank you. Next question: I see somebody receives 5000 test nodes. Do I need to PM somebody or it is automatically?

We used to send messages to a change of the account

What does check mark means near the member name in member list?

Where I need post NODE address? Did distribution start?

Can we use maxmint, he is very trustworthy

It would be best if we would all use the same escrow.
I suggest anon136, he has some practice with alt IPOs.

Maybe, but i believe that the "real time winner" probably would bid again, but then it was closed.
That would be more expensive. 

Yes i think its really the best to not change the list to avoid further discussions.
If someone wants to cancel his bid i would suggest that this spot is free for the
same price as it was claimed.

I will take my 2 lots ( 1 Stake lot and 2 Stake lot) and have one additional question
how we will manage the escrow?

best regards

Yeah.


That is one solution. Its certainly simpler.
But I still think mine is more balanced.

I have edited my post at the same time you wrote your.

Dev asked for possible resolution for the auction controversy, I provided one that I feel is the fairest.
If you disagree, present your own solution.

Of course, so finally we don't need an auction. Only ask everyone how many stakes he want to buy and what price he want to pay. I want to buy more stakes for less money?        

I think its better if you offer "the winners in regular time" to buy the lot at the price of the "winners in overtime".

An example for the second case, because it's a little more complicated.
Lets say that someone would have won two lots, 5 and 10, for 0.6 and 1.2. Thats  1.8 BTC total, but he was outbid with lot 5, and won lot 10 for 1.6 BTC in the overtime.

Without overtime he would have won 15 stakes, for 0.08 BTC per stake. With overtime he won 10 stakes for 0.16 per stake. You could give him 20 stakes for his money.

So essentially he would need to pay the same money he bid, but he would get stakes based on how much a stake would've cost his without overtime.

If his winning bid was less then what he would have paid without overtime, then do the above, plus offer him additional stakes to buy at that price.

I suppose that you entered a wrong passphrase and it gives you a new account number!

I recommend to:


1) Visit the following link http://5.9.123.114:19775/
2) Choose a new passphrase and write it down somewhere so you don't get it wrong!
3) Create a an node account, by submitting your passphrase! After confirming your new NODE account, log out and enter the same passphrase again to double check that the generated account corresponds with your passphrase!
4) After double, triple, quadruple checking that the passphrase gives you the one and the same NODE Account! Send it to me, so i can add it to the file!
5) Save your passphrase somewhere, that you don't get it wrong by mistake!

If you find any difficulties in the above explained how to, let me know!

Here are my two ... Nodes.
The overtime effected the various bidders negatively two different ways.
Those who lost because they were outbid in the overtime.
Those who won, because they also bid overtime, but would have won other lots and/or at a different price without it.

I think the most fair resolution would be allowing ppl from the first category to buy a lot that they would've won if no overtime for the price they bid.
As for the ppl who paid higher then otherwise would have, or got less stake, they could be compensated with more stakes for their money.

You would need to assemble a list without the overtime and compare them, it shouldn't be too hard.

Google Docs works fine as a collaborative spreadsheet, but it is not a realtime auction platform.

Regardless of the method used to stop the auction, I would not expect the spreadsheet timestamp results to be in sync with when bid was placed.

Back-end:
There can be a significant lag between when the bid is submitted by the Form and when the Sheet actually logs the timestamp.
During the last minute of an auction there is a flood of simultaneous edits (lock cells, update cell, run cell formula functions, unlock cells,etc.).
The spreadsheet is multi-threaded and can probably que several hundred bids, but it does not necessarily process them sequentially, and if it does there will be delays.
There are a large quantity of cells with formulas that change frequently, the sheet could be better optimized.

Front-end:
Background applications and installed browser extensions can interfere with the timer and spreadsheet performance.
Before bidding, clear your cache and disable your browser extensions. Use Chrome browser for speed.

I would not recommend using Google Docs for another auction. Just go with sealed bids via PM or email.

To appease a few of the 'non-thieves', maybe our Node devs can offer all of the auction participants a final deal?
An option to buy one single lot of their last highest bid.

Otherwise all sales final and case closed.