"interesting" fork.
The announcement was made on March 12, 2018, and the snapshot was made on December 11, 2017.
Nobody is embarrassed by such a big difference in dates?
but how much is not 2016 or 2013? Or maybe 2010? (sarcasm)
I think all this is very suspicious.
Topic: [CLOSED]: unnamed coin - page 2. (Read 3010 times)
the vicex exchange might list us in a few days > Graf Kot II, [08.04.18 10:59]
i think few days
i think few days
when it start?
could you give me the link of whitepaper ?
I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.
No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize.
But did not wait
This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption.
However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see.
It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins.
But everyone knows about Satoshi and monitoring the movements of his funds.
Sure, you can monitor the funds and see when they move. What do you think will happen when he moves 500,000 Bitcoin? What if Bitcoin is worth 10 trillion dollars in the future and Satoshi moves 500,000 Bitcoin?
There are definitely some problems with that because literally anyone could be Satoshi and we don't know whether it might be very bad that one person or organization owns so much of a potential global currency.
Wallet updated to ones with faster difficulty calculation
Miners are welcome to:
BCBC IS AVAILABLE ON
HASH4VALUE MINING POOL
http://hash4value.pw
Based on Yiimp pool (No Registration Needed)
Payout every 2 hours for balances starting from : 0.01 BCBC
Fee : 0.5% Only (Lowest Fee)
Miners are welcome to:
BCBC IS AVAILABLE ON
HASH4VALUE MINING POOL
http://hash4value.pw
Based on Yiimp pool (No Registration Needed)
Payout every 2 hours for balances starting from : 0.01 BCBC
Fee : 0.5% Only (Lowest Fee)
Code:
-a sha256 -o stratum+tcp://hash4value.pw:3333 -u-p c=BCBC
Buzaath, we updated wallet to a new one but sunc is stuck at 4363 block. It donloads no more blocks. But when pool tries to run 'getblocktemplate' it says
'error -10: bitcoin is downloading blocks...'
What is wrong?
'error -10: bitcoin is downloading blocks...'
What is wrong?
Updating wallet on Hash4Value.pw
Interesting project, let's see how it goes.
I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.
No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize.
But did not wait
This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption.
However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see.
It's debatable of course that Satoshi owns so many Bitcoins, but are you sure that no large organization owns close to as many Bitcoins as Satoshi? We can't know and I think there is a possibility that concentration of ownership in Bitcoin is already high regardless of Satoshi's coins.
WHY IS THERE NO WIN32 WALLET??
My wallet is stuck at block 4359 is anyone elses doing that? I even tried deleting all my appdata folder (except wallet file of course) and restarting and it still hangs there.
Good luck to team. done voting.
I can watch snapshot was taken using data of blocks on 11th December 2017 is that mean everyone having Bitcoins on that specific time automatically becomes eligible for forked coins ? Why for snapshot data of three months was used without prior announcement or there was some pre-announement before and I don't know.
No, there was no pre-announcement, we wanted to make a surprise. And we waited for a long time with the announcement, waited for market to stabilize.
But did not wait
This is quite weird. People know what they have in their wallet NOW, because they can check. But how would someone know which of their BTC addresses were containing BTC three months earlier? This difficulty will surely not help adoption.
However, I must say that the idea of removing Satoshi's coins in quite funny, I'va too always thought at that Sword of Damocles as a major problem nobody want to see.
Wow this would be a great help for us traders as it makes transaction very fast and smooth. Great project for giving our wallets protection.
You guys really need a Discord Channel to help boost exposure to this, this coin has huge potential if it just get's some more exposure. Also a Discord will help pump the votes so we get into the exchanges quicker.
Amazing, blockchain will start from scratch. definitely every transaction will run smoothly.
The project is highly specific and ambitious, and I am delighted that I chose to follow the project and advise everyone to join and not miss the opportunity. 
It says that each wallet with a balance has 1 coin subtracted from it?
Does that mean if you have less than one bitcoin then you get 0 BCBC?
Does that mean if you have less than one bitcoin then you get 0 BCBC?
Yes, but we had a reason to do this.
Holders should come when the coin becomes popular.
Emission through mining is primary.
But that distribution model also forgoes a lot of potential to attract so many people with a balance of less 1 BTC. There are millions and millions of people with less than 1 BTC.
There are dozens of bitcoin clones, i don't believe that MANY holders react to their appearance now.
We consider birth-and-death of forks as evolutionary process and therefore should change different parameters, not only to which all are accustomed.
I understand that but you have the goal to bootstrap a community as easily and quickly as possible and excluding smaller balances works against that goal.
Jump to: