Topic: [CLOSED] YOLOdice.com Signature Campaign - page 5. (Read 78614 times)

BitcoinTalk username: Rengga Jati
YOLOdice user id: 299235
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 1032

*I will wear the avatar + signature if accepted.

---

Hello mOgliE.

I see bitmover has moved to another campaign, so I guess there is an open slot there. I read OP and it is stated "Open" as well.
But if it is a mistake by applying too early, I will delete my post. Thank you.  

BitcoinTalk username: dre1982
YOLOdice user id: 67202
Forum rank: Sr. Member
Current post count: 909

No no, just older by older.
For example legendary joined the campaign 05-2017 as full member and senior joined 04-2017 also as full member and there is an available spot for senior, then this senior member will be eligible for that spot since he is older in the campaign than the legendary. That's the proposition cited above. No one will be offended then tho

I'm not against this proposition. The only problem is the only slot that is open for the Senior member rank is only one. I browsed the spreadsheet for a bit and all of the members that are in Full Member spot are either Senior Member up to Legendary. I don't think that there is enough spots for all to be put in their appropriate ranks.

Anyway like you said, lets wait for their opinion with regards to this but for me the chances of this to happen is low but who knows they will do something about it. We are in one of the longest campaign in the forum. Same with you, I'm happy to be one of it

I think it would be better to move old members enrolled in lower rank to their appropriate rank, based on the date of their enrollment, older by older, whenever a spot is available. New one will join as full member and will get higher rank whenever available.
I will not argue with this proposition, personally I asked to join whatever the rank was and I accept mOgliE and ethan_nx decisions to adopt or not this proposition. Our campaign is one of the best and longest campaign in bitcointalk which is a honor. Good day everyone 

I appreciate this decision of ethan_nx and you  It shows your generosity. If you follow the right rules from the start, he should not receive the payment as he requested. I have no problem with him, but it's ridiculous that he left your campaign before completing the round but still requested payment. Moreover, I judge his actions as unprofessional, normally, before leaving a campaign, people should message the manager, then wait for a response from them. You're right, he's been working with you for over a year and he can't even wait for a week to get a response 

What about the open positions, you will move old members to the right rankings? So will open positions be Sr member?

It would have been a good idea to link this proof in the PM you've sent me you know, would have avoided me to try to find something proving your words.

I could return you the opposite statement: You've been paid for a year and a half without problem so it is pretty unreasonable and disproportionate to make a fuss for such a small amount.

You've technically broken the rule as you've changed your signature in a week cycle. Still your case was in discussion as you were a good member. Ethan asked me to include you in this week payment which is quite nice of him I think, but it's not unreasonable and disproportionate for us to take a week to discuss about you and to include you in the weekly payment and not make a special payment just for you no?

So yeah, you were a good member, it was nice working with you, but I don't like that you start being so aggressive because I haven't answered your PM in the last 3 days. I've managed and paid you every week for a year and a half, maybe at least give us a week before making public claims no?

---

Additionnaly, I've been authorized by Ethan to open the positions of Bitmover and Bitcoinclubgirl. There will be no enrollement period because I was aksed to chose someone "if there was someone worth engaging". Which means I'm going to keep the slots opened until someone can assume the position.

Have a nice day everyone.

You make a good point but if you're use to this thread youll understand that ethan_nx dont have the time to handle questions which is the reason why he hired m0gliE and m0gliE either is kinda busy taking care of his close relative which is why he's late sometime in post counting.
For what is what,  Bitmover shouldn't rely on getting pay for his last week on this campaign since he couldn't wait for the manager reply, he's on this campaign for more than a year and a week free advert shouldn't hurt.

This is why I see why you may not have received the last week's payment stated in their rules.


But, you still have to wait for their statement on this matter. They can also read it when they visit here again in the thread.

m0gliE most likely missed your original post, and he also might miss this one, especially if people will continue having their offtopic conversations here, or someone will start making applications just because the thread was bumped.

You should have and still should write a pm directly to m0gliE and explain the situation. If he missed your post he couldn't have known that you removed your sign in the last moment, so he assumed that it happened earlier in the cycle, so he acted as per the rules and removed your from campaign without payment.

It was inappropriate in my opinion for a feedback as he did not reveal any private information, the spreadsheet is public information.
ethan_nx and mOgliE were getting the results from the participants and hence they were continuing with the long running campaign and it was unwarranted to put pressure on the campaign manager questioning their selection but that does not mean that he cannot ask a question .

No i wasn't aware of it, thanks Plaguedeath. +1, nice name by the way  

---

Will stop popping the topic and commenting here for the moment since it isn't the appropriate place to highlight people with bad faith intention especially after seeing the topic mentioned above  

Edit: i left a neutral feedback, cannot endorse people shaming on public and people who support this should be ashamed. I ask for removal or hiding those member names since they didn't broke any rules, example: member = mem***...

Have you visit this thread sir? https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-large-farm-of-accounts-cheating-on-sig-campaigns-last-update-04142020-5238497 large farm high account and claiming have 100+ account in this forum 

Oh please Haunebu, you are old enough in bitcointalk to know such attitude of a desperate full member or plus account holder who cannot find a suitable sig camp for himself so he creates a newbie account and try to give "advice" to get ride of his rivals or to pick a place of another one. Such disgusting behaviour  
Ps, i am not planning to join any camp for now since I am not very active but seeing stupidity and egoism here attract me a lot to keep visiting bitcointalk.
Something come to my mind with this evil tricky suggestion, are members of the same sig "recycling" merit between them, their alts or between parallel accounts linked to them? Maybe i should pay more attention if this is already done elsewhere?

Put it this way, in the society (in real life) who do you want to like most? The one is always working for the community and recognized by the community. If you do not have good image in your society then no one is going to like or support whatever you are doing as much as they will do for the one who is active in the society. It takes time but once you start doing the good things and can bring yourself to the spotlight then a lot of things get easier.

It's no difference in here. You have to be a community person to be loved and cared by others. Feel free to PM me some of your posts that you think deserve merit or you think undervalued by others. I will try to take care of them.

This sounds really unfair against the purpose of why we have merit system.

I agree only on here. Merits system has been misused in my eyes.

But people are sharing here like merits are being rewarded even for face value. Hence, you cannot measure on merits to identify a shitposter.

Firstly, you seem to know a lot about this forum being a newbie. Good stuff. Anyway, the campaign manager has the right to select whoever he/she wants and everyone in this forum is aware of this.

No merit does not automatically imply you are a bad poster. Many merit points also does not imply that you are a good poster.

Also, you clearly have no idea how tough it is to gain merit in certain sections like the gambling section. On the other hand, it is way easier to gain merit in Wall observer, Meta etc.

Post quality > Merit any day though both are important!

Good decision, manager. Indeed, the project owner's priority is to have best people to promote his project. It makes sense because promoting a project with quality members should be more effective, gaining people's trust, and probably getting more attention by potential new members. In correlation to merit, AFAIK, commonly who got more earned merits may show us how good they are. But never blindly to assess it, looking deeply their post history and their habits are a must.

However, regarding choosing the participants to promote the project is an absolute right of the bounty manager. We never compare one bounty manager to others as each bounty manager may have their own way. So, what ever the decision you made, the participants should accept it without complaints, as long it is fair and doesn't broke forum rules.

That's my own opinion. Hope it can be useful. Thanks 

Never has it crossed in my mind that some campaign participants have not been earning Merits in months or even years. Well done on the research.

---

Will leave my personal opinion here. If the managers of this campaign want hear a non-biased opinion, here it is.

The idea is that some users should be taken out of the campaign without a specific rule in the OP if they have not met a few unofficial requirements such as earning at least a minimum of Merits per month (or 120 days). Speaking from what I have personally seen, if such rule is officially added to the campaign's OP, the campaign participants will start creating useless threads in a desperate try to gain Merits.

Some unofficial rules should exist out there imo, because officializing them means making them aware there is a possibility of being kicked out of the campaign if they don't obey the rules. Applying this "minimum earned merits" as a condition for the existing participants would also be a mistake as they'd be basically forced to earn merits, so the same consequence would take place.

---

I do not have anything to gain from this as I have just joined a campaign a few days ago and I am willing to stay with Hhampuz for now - Seems kinda disrespectful IMO to leave a campaign as soon as you're accepted, unless there is an underlying problem behind the leave.

You've probably said it all, Gambling is board probably the most dynamic board in the forum, most users post there not because they are interested in it, but just for certain requirements, and just as you've pointed out, It requires familiarity and showing genuine interest in the conversation. Most people won't even participate in a free competition, and that shows how much interests they have in gambling generally.


I doubt it's coincidental, but it could be purely accidental, again