Caught them both doing over 600 on the 5s!
Topic: [CLOSED]R5: KnC Jupiter, BELOW-COST+Host! $78+Bonuses! Hashing, 1st payouts sent - page 5. (Read 30689 times)
October 29, 2013, 01:46:46 PM
Caught them both doing over 600 on the 5s!
October 29, 2013, 01:40:04 PM
After testing on my machines, we moved to 0.98 firmware. It seems to have produced a nice bump up in hashrate - no way to actually tell what the effect was until it stabilizes (in several hours) but so far it looks promising.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
So far looks Solid :
Worker 1 Hash Rate 281.444 Gh/s
Worker 2 Hash Rate 283.277 Gh/s
I am really sorry for bitching all the time , but a stupid firmware causing us loose BTC was hard for me to swallow , please forgive me
Your way of handling this group buy is clear example to your future group buy investors & as per me you all doing excellent job , Thank you Redacted , Thomas_s , DyslexicZombei & Bobsag3.
October 29, 2013, 12:07:20 PM
After testing on my machines, we moved to 0.98 firmware. It seems to have produced a nice bump up in hashrate - no way to actually tell what the effect was until it stabilizes (in several hours) but so far it looks promising.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
You need to remember that the last difficulty increase was 40%, meaning, we're making 40% less now than we were when we started, and probably 40% more now than we'll be making in another week.
So if we were expected to make 1 BTC per day before the difficulty change, we're now expected to make .6 BTC per day. So really, .55 BTC in 24 hrs isn't very far out of line with that.
October 29, 2013, 11:56:45 AM
Yeah both are running .97 smooth.
Im not going to touch .97 with a 10ft pole until I determine weather or not it had a hand in me having a large issue with a non-GB jupiter.
How long does it take to revert back to 0.95 firmware which was when we hit 1.32 BTC in 24 hours , 3 mins or 5 mins of restart time ?Could you please stop that ^"nonsense"?
P.S. Yes, I know Jupiters hash rate slowed down a little..
October 29, 2013, 11:38:50 AM
Yeah both are running .97 smooth.
Im not going to touch .97 with a 10ft pole until I determine weather or not it had a hand in me having a large issue with a non-GB jupiter.
How long does it take to revert back to 0.95 firmware which was when we hit 1.32 BTC in 24 hours , 3 mins or 5 mins of restart time ?
October 29, 2013, 11:05:14 AM
You are looking at short term variance, and I didn't notice anyone commenting when the 24 hour earnings hit 1.32 BTC.
What you need to look at is 21 days hashing and 22.38 BTC earned. = 1.07 BTC/day.
-R-
What you need to look at is 21 days hashing and 22.38 BTC earned. = 1.07 BTC/day.
-R-
October 29, 2013, 09:47:47 AM
24 Hour BTC 0.55153800 
October 29, 2013, 02:58:12 AM
I say we read that with a grain of salt and wait for other canaries to test the firmware before us.
I told you guys as someone that's a veteran pro to R&D that these miners are prototypes. Some poor miners chasing 10-30GH/s sometimes end up bricking a unit in the process like that poor guy czz in the CH forum whose problems began immediately after .97 was launched and he installed it coincidentally.
He has lost completely unrecoverable hashing time and hashrate in the process. He will likely never reach ROI unless he can take advantage of arbitrage, somehow. I wish that I could've helped him further.
Let's not be the canary in the coal mine (AKA first to install), until we see that the first canaries haven't died.
I told you guys as someone that's a veteran pro to R&D that these miners are prototypes. Some poor miners chasing 10-30GH/s sometimes end up bricking a unit in the process like that poor guy czz in the CH forum whose problems began immediately after .97 was launched and he installed it coincidentally.
He has lost completely unrecoverable hashing time and hashrate in the process. He will likely never reach ROI unless he can take advantage of arbitrage, somehow. I wish that I could've helped him further.
Let's not be the canary in the coal mine (AKA first to install), until we see that the first canaries haven't died.
Yes Boss
October 29, 2013, 01:41:42 AM
I say we read that with a grain of salt and wait for other canaries to test the firmware before us.
I told you guys as someone that's a veteran pro to R&D that these miners are prototypes. Some poor miners chasing 10-30GH/s sometimes end up bricking a unit in the process like that poor guy czz in the CH forum whose problems began immediately after .97 was launched and he installed it coincidentally.
He has lost completely unrecoverable hashing time and hashrate in the process. He will likely never reach ROI unless he can take advantage of arbitrage, somehow. I wish that I could've helped him further.
Let's not be the canary in the coal mine (AKA first to install), until we see that the first canaries haven't died.
I told you guys as someone that's a veteran pro to R&D that these miners are prototypes. Some poor miners chasing 10-30GH/s sometimes end up bricking a unit in the process like that poor guy czz in the CH forum whose problems began immediately after .97 was launched and he installed it coincidentally.
He has lost completely unrecoverable hashing time and hashrate in the process. He will likely never reach ROI unless he can take advantage of arbitrage, somehow. I wish that I could've helped him further.
Let's not be the canary in the coal mine (AKA first to install), until we see that the first canaries haven't died.
October 28, 2013, 10:49:43 PM
KNC Upcoming firmware News : https://www.kncminer.com/news/news-59
All,
We have noticed an increase in failures with our boxes when the firmware has been updated to 0.97.
There has been a bug identified in this firmware which can cause drop in performance in certain circumstances . There is a fix right now undergoing development but it’s not quite ready to release yet as it must undergo more testing overnight.
We are very aware that our customers are waiting for this hotfix to rescue some boxes who’s performance has dropped after applying 0.97.
The 0.98 release which is scheduled for release tomorrow will contain
1, A solution to address the bug which can cause dramatically reduced performance.
2, A bug fix which will stop the slowly reducing performance over time,
3, A new version of the CGMiner binary provided to us by the CGMiner developer’s
The update will be available tomorrow form our website,
Thanks
KnCMiner Team
All,
We have noticed an increase in failures with our boxes when the firmware has been updated to 0.97.
There has been a bug identified in this firmware which can cause drop in performance in certain circumstances . There is a fix right now undergoing development but it’s not quite ready to release yet as it must undergo more testing overnight.
We are very aware that our customers are waiting for this hotfix to rescue some boxes who’s performance has dropped after applying 0.97.
The 0.98 release which is scheduled for release tomorrow will contain
1, A solution to address the bug which can cause dramatically reduced performance.
2, A bug fix which will stop the slowly reducing performance over time,
3, A new version of the CGMiner binary provided to us by the CGMiner developer’s
The update will be available tomorrow form our website,
Thanks
KnCMiner Team
October 27, 2013, 08:15:56 AM
when will be the next payout ?
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
THEY ARE DOING 2 payments a month so oct 31 or nov 1.
the 2 addresses have 9.11 and 9.07
which is split between gb5 and gb6 so we are at 9.09 for each. which would be .0909 a share.
it should grow to about .12 - .13 a share by the 31st.
coinbase is 184 usd a coin.
I have 19 shares between the 2 buys. so I will get about 2.28 to 2.47 coins. It is early morning so my math my be wrong.
October 27, 2013, 06:26:46 AM
when will be the next payout ?
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
THEY ARE DOING 2 payments a month so oct 31 or nov 1.
the 2 addresses have 9.11 and 9.07
which is split between gb5 and gb6 so we are at 9.09 for each. which would be .0909 a share.
it should grow to about .12 - .13 a share by the 31st.
coinbase is 184 usd a coin.
I have 19 shares between the 2 buys. so I will get about 2.28 to 2.47 coins. It is early morning so my math my be wrong.
October 27, 2013, 05:18:46 AM
when will be the next payout ?
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
can we set payment to every week? f.ex. sunday
October 26, 2013, 01:05:43 PM
BTW
If any fellow Co-op'er is considering trying CEX.IO I would really appreciate if you used my referral link so I can bump up my hashing.
https://cex.io/r/0/Miramyn/0/
PM me with any questions and I will do my best to answer.
If any fellow Co-op'er is considering trying CEX.IO I would really appreciate if you used my referral link so I can bump up my hashing.
https://cex.io/r/0/Miramyn/0/
PM me with any questions and I will do my best to answer.
October 26, 2013, 12:44:27 PM
Thanks Philip,
That is definitely above and beyond and awesome news for the Co-op
That is definitely above and beyond and awesome news for the Co-op
October 25, 2013, 10:38:23 PM
https://blockchain.info/address/19NAwha8LGpRFEBwRgjH5ZMB9YyXeqyY9V this is 7.11 btc this is the " good " miner group buy 6
https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
Both rigs are divided 50/50 R5/R6.https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
so it is not like r5 gets over and r6 gets screwed. it is share and share alike. so then there is no difference in either group just the overall hashing which means the 30gh "lost" is 15 gh a group even less to worry about.
I just got a msg. from bobsag3. He received boxes and boxes from NY.
The exact quote was "so many boxes..."
Thank you Philip! For those that don't know: he gave the co-op a really, really good UPS deal.
He sold me $1100+ worth of UPS/Batteries + he threw in an extra $109 worth of extra batteries for only $525. These funds were mostly mine (I had also forgotten to add UPS protection to our at-cost R2 and R2B, but since that was my mistake, I paid for that out of pocket). Some of its also came from remnants of leftover funds from early GBs after R1.
Philip, who is also our backup local miner host for R1 in NY, also took the time to wrap and ship those boxes and boxes for the co-op, so he deserves a big thank you from the rest of the co-op IMO. You're a good man. Cheers!
October 24, 2013, 04:37:17 PM
https://blockchain.info/address/19NAwha8LGpRFEBwRgjH5ZMB9YyXeqyY9V this is 7.11 btc this is the " good " miner group buy 6
https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
Both rigs are divided 50/50 R5/R6.https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
so it is not like r5 gets over and r6 gets screwed. it is share and share alike. so then there is no difference in either group just the overall hashing which means the 30gh "lost" is 15 gh a group even less to worry about.
October 24, 2013, 03:14:20 PM
https://blockchain.info/address/19NAwha8LGpRFEBwRgjH5ZMB9YyXeqyY9V this is 7.11 btc this is the " good " miner group buy 6
https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
Both rigs are divided 50/50 R5/R6. https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
October 24, 2013, 03:07:47 PM
Thought of the Day: If you're worried this GB can't get a positive ROI, imagine how badly the other ones are doing ;P
October 24, 2013, 01:24:13 PM
https://blockchain.info/address/19NAwha8LGpRFEBwRgjH5ZMB9YyXeqyY9V this is 7.11 btc this is the " good " miner group buy 6
https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
https://blockchain.info/address/13fGQGmb6Xi576ppJTkeXk34yDDRmvxjm4 this is 7.07 btc this is the " bad" miner group buy 5
running total is .04 btc apart and Like I said I donated 109 usd or .52 btc worth of extra batteries. so for the next 2 weeks lets not sweat the small stuff.
Jump to: